Geared Up

On the road to two-wheeled transcendence. One man’s love affair with his bicycle
Bikes rule Amsterdam. If a car hits you, it’s the driver’s fault. Period. Down these crowded streets, walkers fight through designated traffic lanes — one for bikes, and one each for taxis, regular cars, and the tram. But nothing is perfect. When I tell Paul, our bed and breakfast host, about the supercilious, hissing woman and numerous speed-automaton men — like our slick cab driver from the airport — he says, “Yes, here in Amsterdam we have our cycle paths, and we have our psychopaths.” The system, no matter how ingeniously regulated, is bursting at the seams. Car congestion has given way to a different anxiety: moving through public space that is on the verge of becoming a bike dystopia. I wonder if bikes here have become the new cars; if they are two-wheeled insects, they’re sizable ones, like dragonflies. So what does that make walkers — mosquitoes? Maybe there is something in wheeled motion itself that induces aggressive behaviour.


scarlet letter

Down at Central Station, buzzing car and bike traffic rattles Justine, my ten-year-old daughter. She scrapes her hand on my wife’s left brake handle — her second minor bike accident in two days. It’s intense out here for a young girl. The congestion can offer the worst of both worlds: scooter drivers and cyclists whiz by on bicycle highways, with little regard for pedestrians; meanwhile, car traffic is no less dense. Pedestrians are wary, too, and reserve their ire for tourists on bikes who don’t know where they’re going. Teenagers snicker and quack “MacBike! MacBike!” as we parade by on a canal street. We’re fat targets for derision. The MacBike rental company, which has three locations in central Amsterdam, bolts onto its bikes a round metal plate that says “MacBike” in large lettering — mainly to alert pedestrians that you’re an idiot tourist. Around here, “MacBike” is a scarlet letter.

We flee this hornet’s nest of traffic and find refuge in Vondelpark, Amsterdam’s large, leafy inner-city sanctuary. In the days before the classifications yuppie and boomer were coined, hippies used to camp out here and protest the value systems of their parents. We lock up and meander about the park. It’s blissful, but even here the tension winds up. Laura wanders onto the quiet roadway. Suddenly, a middle-aged woman, seated primly, her back straight on her practical machine, heads straight for her. Twenty metres. Should Laura get out of the way? Eighteen metres. What if she moves and the rider veers the same way? Fifteen metres. Better stay put and let the rider go around. Ten metres. This is not happening. Eight metres. It is the rider’s road. Six metres. Rider is determined. Five metres. Rider better break. Four metres. Rider sputters, hisses — three metres — clucks like Mother Goose. Two metres. Guttural noises. One metre. Rider comes to full stop. A look of certain doom is etched on my wife’s face. The rider says, imperiously, “Thank you!” as Laura moves. The rider resumes top cruising speed. Laura heads for the edge of the pond to calm down.

Paul, our B&B owner, says some riders “try to find the absolute shortest way between two points and go as fast as they can. The only thing they respect is the tram, because it is heavy and takes time to stop.” In 1987, the American satirist P. J. O’Rourke theorized that his nation was “afflicted with a plague of bicycles.” Right theory, wrong country, perhaps? Then again, after two weeks any new rider will graduate from naiad to dragonfly and thrive in this cycling ecosystem. Amsterdam’s good councillors organize their chaos with fine attention to detail. They have little space, and less choice. They don’t have the luxury of the Danes in Copenhagen — where bike tracks are gloriously wide and neatly separated from vehicle roadways by shallow brick barriers or marked off with blue paint — but they have succeeded in making their town a bike town.

We head back to North America, to Canada and Toronto, with its enfeebled version of safety for cyclists.

I’m reading participant diaries from web archives of the 2003 inaugural Tour d’Afrique, a four-month-long, 11,900-kilometre course from Cairo to Cape Town. It was completed by thirty-two of thirty-three riders, over half of whom came from Canada. I notice a newspaper clipping on the long table in the middle of my workspace. The Toronto Star article is dated April 21, 2006. “Two cyclists die in separate accidents,” reads the headline. Both riders were on the receiving end of the right hook, inadvertently delivered by large trucks. One was a sixteen-year-old kid, “a jolly little girl,” a neighbour told the reporter. My eyes water; I get up and reel around the room. I taught Justine how to ride, and now can’t avoid the thought: it’s only a matter of time.


a command

“How’s your head?”

Start assessing the damage. Got seven minutes to meet Deanna at Peter Pan. Left knee’s bruised and bleeding. Hey, what’s that, a pain vector out of my left shoulder. Blood trickling down my leg. Face scraped. Ouch. The cop is halfway through writing up his report.

“Where is the driver of the vehicle? ”

“I don’t know. He’s probably gone.

“The skateboarder offers his cell again, in case I want to phone Peter Pan. I don’t know the number. He helps me lock the bike to a metal signpost. It looks better than I feel — salvageable.

The Good Samaritan bus driver shoves off. He protected the site, and me, until the cop arrived. Suddenly, the officer notices an older man across the street, half a block west. He’s coming toward us. Now he’s leaning the other way, thinking, I suspect, “Hey, did I hit something? Better go back and check. Uh-oh, you know what, maybe I’ll just get back in my van…”

“Just a minute,” the officer says, striding toward the man. “Sir, are you the driver of the vehicle involved in the collision?”

A conversation ensues. The white van is parked one block west. The driver is in his late fifties, with grey, matted hair and jagged yellow teeth. He doesn’t have his driver’s licence with him, or his vehicle registration or car insurance. He’s written up. Four violations, with failure to negotiate a left turn the most critical. Later, when I appear in court to testify against him, he doesn’t show. Failure to appear means the charges will stand and he’ll be fined several hundred dollars. I sue his insurance company, settling two years later for an amount my lawyer tells me is too low.

That fateful evening, though, I scrape myself off the curb, get into a cab, and make my Peter Pan dinner date. May 27, 2002, is immediately filed in my memory bank as the day I almost bought the farm. I order risotto — no need to cut anything, right? — and drink a martini. Deanne looks at me looking at the waiter. “Bill, you have to go to the hospital,” she says. A command.


man-machine transcendence

At St. Michael’s, X-rays show a nasty spiral fracture of the ulna. The emergency doctor places a cast on my broken right arm. Six weeks later, it’s still there and I’m in my GP’s office. No break was discovered in my left hand, but an acute pain persists. The doctor feels my left hand for a minute, digging around, pinpointing the ache. She orders me across the street and calls radiology, requesting a specific shot. At last, magnified X-rays show the shattered, kidney- shaped scaphoid. This peanut-sized marvel just above the thumb and ahead of the wrist has a notorious ability to break and evade detection. The stealth fracture only shows itself through time and further damage. The doctor phones from her office. “William, you have to get a cast on that left hand. Now.”

I walk out of St. Mike’s after five hours with a fresh plaster cast on my left arm and hand, to complement the scuffed fibreglass model on my right. They want the old cast to stay on for eight weeks instead of six, just to be sure. This means two weeks of double casting. I tell the emergency doctor I’m going to the cottage. “Okay,” he says, “I know your type.” Moulding a beautiful plaster cast around not only my left arm, not only my left hand, but also my left thumb, he tells me to position my left hand as if I’m holding a bottle of beer. “That’s the only thing you’re going to be doing next week,” he says. Great, a humorist, I think.

Now comes the big dilemma: do I leave the hospital in a cab or on a bike? I’d ridden down to the doctor’s office with my damaged left hand and right cast. Truth is, I’ve been back on the bike for a couple of weeks already. The first time, I experienced involuntary tremors in both hands and couldn’t grip the handlebars. The thought — “Maybe I can’t ride again” — shot like a flaming arrow through my mind. My heart pumped madly with the negative energy of failure, but the shakes eventually subsided.

After staring into the brilliant azure of the early-evening sky, I straddle and push off. Sidewalks only. Slow. Victoria and Shuter to Logan and Dundas... what, three klicks? I worry that I could become the target of a Toronto Star slice-of-life photo takeout: “Man with two casts rides bike — what an idiot!” But I carry on. Two blocks short of home, I dismount gingerly — don’t want the neighbours to see me riding with two casts.

I start to see myself in a different light and search for evidence of compulsive behaviour. In his novel The Third Policeman, Flann O’Brien writes: “The gross and net result of it is that people who spent most of their natural lives riding iron bicycles over the rocky roadsteads of this parish get their personalities mixed up with the personalities of their bicycles as a result of the interchanging of the atoms of each of them and you would be surprised at the number of people in these parts who nearly are half people and half bicycles.” Is that it?

But Flann, it’s not just the rocky roadsteads — you forgot the rocky road falls. Not long after the casts came off, I wiped out. I went flying over the handlebars at 9 a.m. on a Sunday morning, surging down empty Gerrard Street to my university office. The road was empty except for a student driver, who managed to swing widely left to make a hard right turn, and nearly took me out. To avoid impact, I slammed on the brakes and landed exactly as I had nine weeks before — right hand outstretched, then left. This time, there was no damage. Miraculous.

The following winter, I received my first-ever door prize. I’d just delivered a guest lecture for a friend at night school, and luckily was too tired to ride fast. Still, the driver’s-side door nearly cleaved me in two and cracked a rib. I didn’t pursue legal action — I had no front light. Then, this summer, as my daughter and I charged up a steep bike and pedestrian path, Justine in the lead, she faltered. I hit the brakes, flew over the handlebars, and crashed my left shoulder onto asphalt to avoid landing on top of her. Maybe that white van had sideswiped my ability to avoid crashing; maybe I’m a menace; maybe I shouldn’t be on the road at all, I thought.

Previous · Page 4 of 5 · Next

14 comment(s)

John LaidlawMay 13, 2008 12:47 EST

A wonderful article - and staring out with as good a description of why us "utility cyclists" ride as any I've ever seen or come up with.
Yes - cycling has its dangers. though I've not had the run of ill luck Bill reynolds has, I've chewed my own fair share of asphalt over fifty years and more.
I've had at least one wipe-out that was directly attributable ot my torquing through a corner, trying to make the advance green. The intersection of Cook and Finlayson Streets, in Victoria, slopes from NE to SW, and I was coming from the Norht, turning East. A poor situation, with a lot of reverse camber. As I flew around the corner, my rear wheel must have hit a bit of sand on the road - to the best of my knowledge, there was no pedal strike - and I went down, sliding on my yellow jacket. I realised that I was now in the middle of the road, with cars going past north and south, on either side of me. I must ahve been out for a couple of seconds. When I tried to move, my legs, for a moment, went on strike - most disconcerting. I got up, shaken but unbloodied, and then realised I'd put paid to my rear wheel - already on a fourth or fifth incarnation. I carried it to the first corner I could reach - the NE one, where I was approached by a lady, who fearfully asked if I were OK. She'd been behind me, in her mini-van, and feared she'd clipped me as I went down. I assured her I was shaken, but otherwise OK, and she offerd me a lift home, which I accepted. When I finally took my helmet off (I wore them, then, because I'd been doing so, to get my daughter to do it all the time, and felt naked without one.) I found an alarming crak in the foam at teh front, and then discovered the back had been crushed. I'm now a believer.
I ride, almost all the time, in traffic, and have always been aware of what's behind me. I've taken to using lights, even in bright daylight, as every little bit of visibility helps.
What I have discovered is that, with the usual lamentable exceptions, traffic (drivers) have become much more accepting of cyclists in general. Now - if only the cyclists were themselves, as accepting of drivers on the roads, as willing to make sure the drivers have the best chance of seeing them, and avoiding them, as they could wish.

Pat TMay 15, 2008 12:51 EST

My thoughts here: http://freedomisacupcake.blogspot.com/2008/05/2-wheels-good-4-wheels-bad.html

AnonymousMay 16, 2008 17:04 EST

Never bother to call a cop when you get hit as a cyclist. They don't care and they don't do a thing.
Last time I got cut off twice by the same driver in a goddamn minivan, the second time sending me head over habdlebars as I braked hard to avoid being a hood ornament, I called the pigs and after 7 and a half hours the wench rolled up and told me there was no traffic violation since I didn't hit the van. Just me falling off my bike she says.
She didn't want to check the video cameras of the stores in the area or do any "police work".
Got sideswiped in front of a cop, tell her what happened and she writes the licence plate down, hands me the paper and says call the police! My mistake for thinking she was the police. A hat, badge and gun will do that.
Stupid cops. Don't even get me started about the lazy thugs as they drive or even ride by cars parked in the bike lane or driving cyclists off the road and do nothing. Can't expect a cop to do his/her job. I have learned that from nth number of encounters involving more than just cycling (i.e. being threatend with a gun, assualted, etc.)
U-lock justice friends, that is all we really have.
Hope you are okay, my encouter with the van left me limping for a week.
One night I would love to put one of those metal bike poles for locking up your ride in the middle of Dundas and lock a bike to it. See how the drivers like their lane being taken by someone with no consideration who needs to park.

Andrew SullivanJune 05, 2008 09:05 EST

Not long after I finished reading Bill Reynolds's article about bicycling, a group of Toronto bike activists blocked the Gardiner Expressway. Their reason was, apparently, that they wanted bike lanes on Bloor St.

I thought the activists had something in common with Mr Reynolds. Just as Mr Reynolds was willing to inconvenience and endanger pedestrians by riding on the sidewalk with two casts on his arms (because, well, he wanted to), the activists were willing to inconvenience and endanger drivers on the Gardiner because they wanted something to happen at the other end of town.

This is what dealing with bicyclists in Toronto is like. Totally respectable-looking people — the sort that Toronto the Good used to be made of — will happily run you down on the sidewalk, dinging their little bells and expecting you to get out of the way. The police on bicycles blithely glide past the no bicycling sign in Riverdale Park. Brownian motion is more predictable than the behaviour of many cyclists in traffic. The stop sign on the TTC streetcar door is, apparently, just for cars, which is why I did not see the bicycle hit the guy with the cane as he stepped away from the streetcar.

I know, I know, you personally ride carefully and according to the rules. The problem is that, once a significant number of bicyclists are unpredictable, they all are. As a pedestrian, I have to assume every cyclist is a jerk, because if I bet otherwise I run too great a risk of getting creamed.

I used to ride everywhere. Of recent years, I have mostly stayed off my bike, because I'm ashamed to be associated with the yahoos that are zooming around on two wheels, acting as though the world owes them something. I've been doored. I've taken right hooks. I know the dangers, and I know how to ride in the city. But I'm embarrassed to do so.

The reason many people treat bicyclists as though they are annoying children is because that's how many of them act. They wanna ride on the sidewaaaalk. They wanna have a bike laaane. They want the space they are legally accorded on the road, but they don't want any of the restrictions that come with it. I suspect what they really want is that childhood feeling of freedom that came from being able to go fast, and damn anyone who will get in their way.

We all want everything to go our way. And it's certainly true that many motorists are lousy drivers, careless of anything that is in their way and that isn't an automobile (and, in fact, of many things that are). But if bicycles want to be treated with any kind of respect on the road — or by the rest of the urban polity — they have to act with some respect for the rest of us too. If instead they act like children with a new toy, they shouldn't be surprised at the treatment they get.

AnonymousJune 11, 2008 14:20 EST

Andrew,
To clarify, from what I understand, the ride on the Gardiner on May 30th had no direct link to advocating for bike lanes on Bloor. This error has since been corrected by several media sources. Although a couple of bikes had flags on them referencing the need for these lanes, there were different flags as well. Folks have been asking for bike lanes on Bloor St for years - perhaps the media picked up on the Bloor St. issue because it was most familiar and because no specific reason was given by any of the participants.

The group ride ended up down near the on ramp and made an unplanned 'strength in numbers' decision to go for it. They approached the relatively slow late rush hour traffic with extreme caution, and as cars slowed further and openings in adjacent lanes became available, the group filled the full roadway. From first hand accounts, those drivers directly behind the cyclists were smiling, waving, giving thumbs up and even had a few passengers taking photos of the unusual sight - any cars further back would have simply been in slightly slower than usual traffic. I don't understand how you think this group 'endangered' drivers on the Gardiner.

Jeff GlenJune 13, 2008 23:01 EST

A beautiful story. I took my car off the road over seven years ago and have rode every day since - I even biked across China to Mt. Everest basecamp, Nepal, India, Thailand and Cambodia. From all of this experience I have learned one thing, bicycles and cars can not share the road (especially in Vancouver). We need dedicated bike lanes period. I think adding these bike lanes will also get more people cycling which truly is a great way to get around. There is definitely a personal satisfaction to being your own form of transportation. For Andrew: for the cyclists who cut off cars, ride on sidewalks and generally take risks - they are no different than car drivers who do the same. Jerks are jerks! However most of us are cautious and aware of pedestrians, it is just that a 3000 lb car kind of puts you on the defensive. Please be patient and remember we are doing a hell of a lot for air quality!

ZarbeSSeptember 01, 2008 20:57 EST

Thank you Bill... and Walrus.

Pat TSeptember 03, 2008 21:09 EST

@John Spragge:

Sir, you hit the nail on the head. Here here!

Cyclists are singled out, because they are 'the other' on the roads. they are the exception, the minority. Every infraction of theirs is magnified, while the wholesale enormity of automobile-based destruction, death, and lawlessness is ignored because it is altogether mundane... Like beating one's wife used to be.

The untenability of the 'pro-motorist, anti-cyclist' is so obvious it's become the proverbial elephant in the room, and for motorists to confess to their complicity in planet-wide degradation perhaps involves a bit too much cognitive dissonance.

AnonymousJune 22, 2009 18:10 EST

Biggest bike problem in Toronto? Bicycles on sidewalks. Which amount to threatening assault as they come at the sidewalk pedestrian. Criminal, antisocial, a bit sick. Very very big problem. Check it out in the sidestreets and main streets in and near downtown Toronto. For example, the block between College-Bathurst and Spadina-Dundas. Check it out at all hours. It's a war. With one side committing criminal acts.

home improvement & designJanuary 13, 2010 00:59 EST

You depict the post very well. I just love it. The nature is the best for web designing and others too.

health careJanuary 13, 2010 01:00 EST

Thank you, after searching for a few hours, I finally found the inspiration I was looking for.

automotiveJanuary 13, 2010 01:01 EST

It's so refreshing to find articles like the ones you post on your site. Very informative reading. I will keep you bookmarked. Thanks!

DACJanuary 14, 2010 08:55 EST

Great article that absolutely drives me to get back on two wheels.

I started riding as my childhood asthma started to go away - though I'm told asthma never really goes away - and every ride feels like a rebellion against illness.

Since getting back on a bike after earning my driver's license, I've raced a couple citizen races, worked in a shop, became a gear head briefly, an advocate for both off and on road riding, watched my stable of bikes grow, worked on the Tour D'Afrique and a second tour across Europe, crewed for a stage race in South Africa, ridden year round, and enjoyed the looks from those who think I am crazy for being thirty years old and still getting a kick out of riding.

As one of my favourite waterbottles says (from a shop in Germany) Happy Trails, Happy Rides.

borsaAugust 16, 2010 10:45 EST

We all want everything to go our way. And it's certainly true that many motorists are lousy drivers, careless of anything that is in their way and that isn't an automobile (and, in fact, of many things that are). But if bicycles want to be treated with any kind of respect on the road — or by the rest of the urban polity — they have to act with some respect for the rest of us too. If instead they act like children with a new toy, they shouldn't be surprised at the treatment they get.

Add a comment

  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
June 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Foundation National Event Guide

The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone

12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto

The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?

6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary

The Walrus Laughs
The Walrus SoapBox