The Stranger Within

Who is Michael Ignatieff? Why does he want to run the country? And does he have what it takes, not only to defeat Stephen Harper, but also — first things first — to bring peace to his own party?
Photograph by Christopher Wahl
Let us step away for a moment from the ear-splitting racket of the political racetrack, the huffing and puffing, the gyrating polls, the editorial pontifications and advertising positive or negative. Let us concede victory to Michael Ignatieff in the next election or let him concede defeat to Stephen Harper — it’s of little matter to our purpose.

Let us acknowledge that Ignatieff is a writer of international renown, a chum of the high and mighty, a man of many virtues and talents, fluently bilingual, decent, fair minded, polite to old ladies, and respectful of war vets, a model of the person we should hope to see in our public life and as our representative on the world stage.

Let us grant that Michael Ignatieff is more intelligent than we, better educated, better read, better travelled, better connected, better looking, an altogether superior fellow. Let us posit that he entered this very tough game in his advanced years out of an old-fashioned sense of duty to his nation. Let us suppose, for the sake of argument, that he would make a better prime minister than Stephen Harper, a low bar indeed.

Okay, so now that we’ve got all that out of the way, let’s find a quiet corner where we might sit and ask ourselves why we haven’t been bowled over, swept away, or even had our socks knocked off. To paraphrase Kurt Weill, is it him or is it us?

The backstory begins with a creation myth, an original sin, an immaculate misconception. In January 2005, three kingmakers traversed afar, following yonder star from Toronto to Boston in search of a messiah, he who would lead them out of the political wilderness and into the Prime Minister’s Office.

They were bright, charming, engaged Liberals, and their flattering words showed them to be, in Ignatieff’s eyes at least, discerning judges of character. Like him, they were impressive on paper, not party elders but not Young Turks either.

Alf Apps: senior partner at the law firm of Fasken Martineau, former CEO of the Lehndorff Group and Newstar Technologies, specialist in corporate mergers and acquisitions, chief Ontario organizer for John Turner’s leadership campaign in 1984. He had first spoken to Ignatieff by phone, out of the blue, in October.

Dan Brock: partner in Fasken Martineau’s government relations and ethics practice group, former CBC reporter, former policy adviser to Finance Minister John Manley, hailed as one of Canada’s top 100 lobbyists. He had arranged for Ignatieff to meet seven active Liberals at a secret three-hour meeting in Toronto in December.

Ian Davey: television producer, erstwhile Manley supporter, son of Keith the Rainmaker, the ad salesman who had served as a strategic wizard to Lester Pearson and Pierre Trudeau. One day, Ian was conjuring up future prime ministers of Canada when he landed on Ignatieff and yelled, “Eureka!”

To mix my biblical metaphors, Apps, Brock, and Davey led Michael up an exceeding high mountain and showed him the kingdom to the north and said unto him, “All this power and glory will we give thee,” or words to that effect, “if thou wilt worship us.”

It wasn’t expressed quite so baldly, of course, but the temptation they dangled over their long dinner at the Charles Hotel went something like this: Ignatieff would deliver a barnburner speech at the Liberal convention in March, move back to Canada by the fall, secure a perch at the University of Toronto, write a book, make a TV documentary, find a riding, knock on doors, and get elected. Though a rookie MP, he would ascend swiftly into the cabinet to sit at the right hand of Paul Martin, learn the ropes of Parliament and government for a couple of years, run for the leadership when Martin retired, win, and become prime minister of Canada.

By happenstance, they caught Ignatieff at a moment when he was open to their enticement. He was approaching sixty years of age. He was in the habit of reinventing himself every decade or so. He was feeling a strong nostalgic pull to return to his native land after almost thirty years abroad. And being a renowned public intellectual at Harvard wasn’t all it was cracked up to be, especially after he blotted his copybook at the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy by supporting George W. Bush’s disastrous invasion of Iraq.

What better way to cap an illustrious life of thought and letters than to become un homme engagé, an actor on the stage, a servant of the people, a prime minister? What more appropriate destiny for the grandson of Count Pavel Ignatiev, minister of education to Czar Nicholas II, and the scion of a prominent clan of British imperialists, Upper Canadian academics, and distinguished diplomats? Hadn’t young Michael proclaimed it his intention as a lad on the playing fields of Upper Canada College?

By the end of the meal, according to one participant, the question wasn’t “why?” but “how?”

It wasn’t unlike the urban legend, often attributed to Margaret Atwood, of the brain surgeon who tells her at a dinner party that he’s thinking of writing a novel after he retires. “Oh, that’s a coincidence,” she is supposed to have said. “I’m thinking of becoming a brain surgeon.”

Home · Page 1 of 6 · Next

15 comment(s)

GuillaumeDecember 07, 2009 16:48 EST

Great article, Graham decidedly takes sides in the Liberal tribal wars but nevertheless gets the narrative right. But what's with the weird part about Québécois girls and loup-garous? Maybe it's meant to be a Freudian window on English Canada's psyche? It is incredibly disturbing and not based on actual facts.

JJDecember 07, 2009 20:05 EST

Fantastic assessment. Especially the deconstructionist part. Spot-on.

1mouseDecember 07, 2009 21:39 EST

Hee-hee, this article should have been written long ago, at the time when Canadians all across the land watched, listened, watched, listened, became utterly confused and then en masse said to selves - This guy is not a politician, nice enough guy and all, but no way is he a politician.

TommDecember 08, 2009 21:22 EST

Great and inciteful piece.

First thing I've read that puts a package together on why, when, and how with respect to Michael Ignatieff.

A couple small complaints, if I may. The first is the obvious fawning nature of the piece. The borne and bred Liberal point of view that cloys like too much after shave "...a low bar indeed...".

The second is the well described piece about Liberal history and how it conforms to the national balance between Quebec and Ontario. The build up clearly implies a "bigger" Canada is about to be described, but the entire piece never returns to this, instead appearing to accept and acknowledge that the Canadian hinterlands are still beyond Liberal understanding.

If the Liberal Party of Canada is to emerge from its funk, it somehow must find the rest of the nation. This just isn't possible when party insiders woo blue blood academics from Harvard to lead us.

CanuckDecember 10, 2009 14:27 EST

Insightful article. For a man that's an intellectual, Ignatieff has done nothing except make one error after another. His personality lacks depth—he moves from one cause to another without a Canadian well to draw from. Unfortunately, he'll not make a good Prime Minister should the electorate get so fed up with Harper that they decide to try him out. My prediction, he'll never be up to the job because his why's change.

canuckDecember 10, 2009 14:37 EST

My opinion is that Michael Ignatieff lacks a deep taproot.

r4 dsDecember 10, 2009 15:41 EST

"Unfortunately, he'll not make a good Prime Minister"

I think he will be, according to this information.

AnonymousDecember 10, 2009 23:17 EST

My God, I had no idea that Montreal native Ron Graham hated Toronto so much.

Mr. Graham's sputtering resentment of those evil Torontonians trying to get their hands on the country would make more sense if Montrealers (and one Shawiniganite) hadn't occupied 24 Sussex so much since 1968.

RJADecember 13, 2009 16:29 EST

Frankly I don't believe Micheal Ignatieff actually is Canadian - why would anyone who was spend so much time and effort trying to convince everyone that they are? Apart from that he gets my vote.

RLucasDecember 24, 2009 18:46 EST

Voilà un article fascinant, beau travail. Si Ignatieff n'est pas le premier ministre que souhaitent les Canadiens, la question est, est-ce qu'il devrait l'être? Son expérience personnelle, nous la rêvons tous un peu, alors serions-nous les hypocrites? Peut-être nous reviendra-t-il de vacances avec une « vision » cette fois, histoire que nous ayons plus de matière à juger; nouvelle équipe, même leader, voilà une expérience qui devrait mener à des conclusions signifiantes.

L. RhéaumeDecember 25, 2009 12:46 EST

You may be a great shipbuilder but if you want to see your ship survive in the stormy seas, you must master the simple art of shiphandling and navigation!

amiracleJanuary 03, 2010 01:39 EST

the so-called "urban legend" is attributed to Margaret Laurence, not Atwood.

E. HouleJanuary 16, 2010 18:15 EST

Informative article, but its tone is pretty cynical.

And enough with the Toronto-bashing, already! The Bay Street elite that some people evoke—-or exaggerate—-may attempt to impose their own interests on the country, but are they any more guilty than, say, Calgary oil execs, or more than one province's government for that matter? Or is it just easier for Canadians to whine about Torontonians' isolated self-love so they can ignore their own?

AnonymousJanuary 24, 2010 19:25 EST

great article

AnonymousJanuary 31, 2010 14:57 EST

fantastic article very good read thanks

Add a comment

  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
June 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Foundation National Event Guide

The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone

12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto

The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?

6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary

The Walrus Laughs
The Walrus SoapBox