The Stranger Within

Who is Michael Ignatieff? Why does he want to run the country? And does he have what it takes, not only to defeat Stephen Harper, but also — first things first — to bring peace to his own party?
And then there was the bewilderment, the helplessness, the awful lurch in the pit of the stomach when he and his party went into a free fall in September. By the end of the month, his Quebec lieutenant, Denis Coderre, had quit his post over a nomination dispute in Outremont, taking a parting shot at the “Toronto advisers who know nothing about the social and political realities of Quebec.” By late October, his poll numbers were down more than ten points to 25 percent, Dion territory, and there was talk of a Harper majority. The press, smelling blood, turned on the wounded hero and moved in for the kill.

Predictably, there arose screams of anger and panic from party members, demanding that the gods be appeased with a sacrificial offering. Just as Alf Apps had called for the head of Jim Coutts, now the knives were out for Apps, Brock, and Davey by those who resented — and wanted — their influence.

“It always happens when you have an interesting patch of water,” Ignatieff told the Globe and Mail, “that people say, ‘Let’s throw some crew to the sharks, that’ll make the boat go better.’ If my staff doesn’t perform up to expectations, I won’t hesitate to make changes. But [long pause] in my view, we’re doing fine.”

Three weeks later, on October 27, he threw Ian Davey overboard. Like Horatio Hornblower roused from a dream by a cry that his ship was cruising toward the rocks, he finally did something really smart: he persuaded Peter Donolo to be his new chief of staff.

On the surface, Donolo seemed more of the same, a pollster and public relations guy from Toronto. In fact, he was a breath of fresh air. Originally from Montreal, of Italian heritage, bilingual and free spirited, he knew the party and the players intimately, was highly regarded by almost everyone in Canada’s political class and the media, and brought years of experience in the Opposition leader’s office and the PMO as Chrétien’s director of communications. It helped, too, that he had an impish sense of humour and actually liked other people. Most useful of all, Donolo was an insider who understood grassroots politics. He wouldn’t have written off Paul Martin Jr. so early in the game and cast his lot with Jean Chrétien unless he knew that the important votes weren’t on Parliament Hill or Bay Street. Nor was he naive enough to believe that the spin matters more than the content.

Of course, there was plenty of work to be done to polish Ignatieff’s delivery of the message in time for the election campaign. Before that, however, Donolo needed to sit down with his leader, take him all the way back to the beginning, and tell him in no uncertain terms that the tough question isn’t “How?” The tough question is “Why, Michael, why?”
Ron Graham has written extensively about Canadian politics. His new book about the patriation of the Constitution and the Charter of Rights in 1982 comes out this fall.
Previous · Page 6 of 6 · Home

15 comment(s)

GuillaumeDecember 07, 2009 16:48 EST

Great article, Graham decidedly takes sides in the Liberal tribal wars but nevertheless gets the narrative right. But what's with the weird part about Québécois girls and loup-garous? Maybe it's meant to be a Freudian window on English Canada's psyche? It is incredibly disturbing and not based on actual facts.

JJDecember 07, 2009 20:05 EST

Fantastic assessment. Especially the deconstructionist part. Spot-on.

1mouseDecember 07, 2009 21:39 EST

Hee-hee, this article should have been written long ago, at the time when Canadians all across the land watched, listened, watched, listened, became utterly confused and then en masse said to selves - This guy is not a politician, nice enough guy and all, but no way is he a politician.

TommDecember 08, 2009 21:22 EST

Great and inciteful piece.

First thing I've read that puts a package together on why, when, and how with respect to Michael Ignatieff.

A couple small complaints, if I may. The first is the obvious fawning nature of the piece. The borne and bred Liberal point of view that cloys like too much after shave "...a low bar indeed...".

The second is the well described piece about Liberal history and how it conforms to the national balance between Quebec and Ontario. The build up clearly implies a "bigger" Canada is about to be described, but the entire piece never returns to this, instead appearing to accept and acknowledge that the Canadian hinterlands are still beyond Liberal understanding.

If the Liberal Party of Canada is to emerge from its funk, it somehow must find the rest of the nation. This just isn't possible when party insiders woo blue blood academics from Harvard to lead us.

CanuckDecember 10, 2009 14:27 EST

Insightful article. For a man that's an intellectual, Ignatieff has done nothing except make one error after another. His personality lacks depth—he moves from one cause to another without a Canadian well to draw from. Unfortunately, he'll not make a good Prime Minister should the electorate get so fed up with Harper that they decide to try him out. My prediction, he'll never be up to the job because his why's change.

canuckDecember 10, 2009 14:37 EST

My opinion is that Michael Ignatieff lacks a deep taproot.

r4 dsDecember 10, 2009 15:41 EST

"Unfortunately, he'll not make a good Prime Minister"

I think he will be, according to this information.

AnonymousDecember 10, 2009 23:17 EST

My God, I had no idea that Montreal native Ron Graham hated Toronto so much.

Mr. Graham's sputtering resentment of those evil Torontonians trying to get their hands on the country would make more sense if Montrealers (and one Shawiniganite) hadn't occupied 24 Sussex so much since 1968.

RJADecember 13, 2009 16:29 EST

Frankly I don't believe Micheal Ignatieff actually is Canadian - why would anyone who was spend so much time and effort trying to convince everyone that they are? Apart from that he gets my vote.

RLucasDecember 24, 2009 18:46 EST

Voilà un article fascinant, beau travail. Si Ignatieff n'est pas le premier ministre que souhaitent les Canadiens, la question est, est-ce qu'il devrait l'être? Son expérience personnelle, nous la rêvons tous un peu, alors serions-nous les hypocrites? Peut-être nous reviendra-t-il de vacances avec une « vision » cette fois, histoire que nous ayons plus de matière à juger; nouvelle équipe, même leader, voilà une expérience qui devrait mener à des conclusions signifiantes.

L. RhéaumeDecember 25, 2009 12:46 EST

You may be a great shipbuilder but if you want to see your ship survive in the stormy seas, you must master the simple art of shiphandling and navigation!

amiracleJanuary 03, 2010 01:39 EST

the so-called "urban legend" is attributed to Margaret Laurence, not Atwood.

E. HouleJanuary 16, 2010 18:15 EST

Informative article, but its tone is pretty cynical.

And enough with the Toronto-bashing, already! The Bay Street elite that some people evoke—-or exaggerate—-may attempt to impose their own interests on the country, but are they any more guilty than, say, Calgary oil execs, or more than one province's government for that matter? Or is it just easier for Canadians to whine about Torontonians' isolated self-love so they can ignore their own?

AnonymousJanuary 24, 2010 19:25 EST

great article

AnonymousJanuary 31, 2010 14:57 EST

fantastic article very good read thanks

Add a comment

  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
June 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Foundation National Event Guide

The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone

12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto

The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?

6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary

The Walrus Laughs
The Walrus SoapBox