On the Margins of Freedom

An essay by a Canadian convicted of murder

We are no doubt better off without the prisons that tamed Wilde. But something may be said for the dignity of tragedy once granted to sufferers by the conviction that suffering discloses something worth more than the entire ordinary world. There is another kind of suffering in the prisons of today, quite different from the agony of which Wilde made such profound use. The romance that could survive in Reading Gaol fares ill in the prefabricated architecture of the modern prison. These concrete and razor wire prisons are in their own way less kind than even the bricks of Reading Gaol. Gould could have tried to content himself by humming Bach partitas, but he would have found it difficult through the thumps and screeches of death metal or rap, through yelling and heinous laughter and television. Instead of desolate affliction openly acknowledged and torture murderously inflicted, the better prisons of today put up an ugly parody of life. Under the inhuman rubric of “corrections” and in the robotic “positive programming” jargon of today, the prisoner is enlisted in gainless employment, in banality and triviality, in the perpetual effort at a modicum of physical comfort. Here there is no crucifixion, but endless Stations of the Way: the steps that must be willingly taken, the knowledge that each volitional step is a movement toward a dismal and mean end. As torturers know all too well, the victim’s feeling of complicity with the pain makes the suffering greater. So it is that the knowledge of my own collaboration in the days of my ordinary prison life, in the rituals repeated and the trifling pursuit of utter inconsequence, makes the awful nullity of the existence worse. Longing, futility, repetition: how uncanny the Greeks were in their psychology of suffering when they imagined the punishments of Sisyphus and Tantalus.

The overcrowded prisons of today immerse the prisoner in a foul-mouthed world pervaded by an underlying bestiality of spirit, a world without ordinary freedom and with no sense of any other. Hell is other people, Sartre reported; prison is filled with them. The person forced into prison is plunged into the strife of pompous thugs with corrupt images and inane slogans inscribed on their bodies like graffiti on the dirty wall of a dilapidated lavatory. The stereotype of prisoners as monstrous, grotesque predators tells much more about the mentality of the public than about the reality of the prisoners, but that phantasmagoric image is still closer to epitome than to caricature of the prison subculture itself, which is a toxic distillation of the degraded mass culture from which it springs.

Perversely, it is for the worst that prison is hardly a punishment. These inmates are in their element. Actual violence is honoured. Savagery secures a conscious respect. The coarsest racial tribalism, fundamentalist religion, misogyny, philistinism, junk food, the kitsch cult of sports: all dominate in a hermetic environment that works to make it all seem perfectly natural, as though to induce prisoners and guards alike to forget that anything else exists, could exist, or has ever existed on earth. Nothing remains uncorrupted: Christianity, which once served to chisel out refined human beings, here churns out the crude and the coarse. What inspired Fear and Trembling and Bach is reduced to hokum, bestsellers, and banjo music — if not far worse.

Individual prisoners, of course, may not conform to any of this, but the contagion of prison air is irresistible; even resilient individuals acknowledge its hegemony. And so any life must be a conscientious struggle, an existence of inner exile and alienation, with pantomimes of feigned interest, suppressions of boredom, and expressions of profane pieties. Everything that demands careful development — sensitivity, tact, discernment, incisiveness — dulls in desuetude in prison. Such oddities as curiosity, subtlety, grace, and intelligence, which have little enough place in the world at large, here on noisy days can seem mere fantasies, or at best childhood dreams that cannot quite be recalled. But what prison life impresses on me perhaps most terribly is not just frangibility of soul, but unlively contempt for what remains: the diminishing expectations, the compromise of aspiration, as each unrecoverable day goes by, accumulating memories that are the stuff of nightmare.

I loathe prisoners, of course, but this means I loathe myself, for I am one, damaged and declining also. If I hold on to my contempt and self-loathing because they keep me in touch with some iota of what I should still yearn for and might have become in a different, challenging, various life, I know how ridiculous that nostalgia is. Under these fluorescent lights, quiet repose — whether scholarly, musical, or otherwise — has the cast of desperate escapism and risible amour propre. No lover given over to reveries of his beloved, condemned to caress her features in fading photographs, could be less fit than a prisoner to distinguish between liberation and escapism. In this sense, prison serves as an apt metaphor for both freedom and determinism — an emblem of their consubstantial uselessness; for prison teaches above all that the future will have no cure for the past, and life no end but the tomb.

There is perhaps one kind of freedom that prison can make you understand as no other experience can. To grasp the indifference of the universe is one thing; to understand the open malevolence of an entire society of human beings is quite another. In the segregation cell, you are confronted with the terrible confluence of both. The world is narrowed to a single dirty room. However many times you are moved, the room is always the same; only the dirt is different. The days are the same as well, and they operate on the same, repeated plan. The food comes in on a tray, the tray goes out. The brief gleam of our lives between dark eternities seems not glimmer but dingy waste. The self and the spirit, you come to realize, do not exist deep within, but extend far beyond you; they exist only through the connection with all of that with which you share an interest. In utter desolation all becomes idle, and even if you know you will get out with some life still left to live, even if you think it will be soon, you feel an irresistible awareness of the senselessness that life is, alone. Even self-mastery can come to seem futile. Become a stoic if you like, and practise resignation, practise your indifference to all that happens; the system continues as before. Hope is irrelevant; only the perpetual loss of the present moment is real, absolute, permanent.

For a long time, I would try to live out in as much detail as possible my memory of days long past and far removed: in Pakistan, sun-bathed reveries on a warm couch, playing with kittens, a precocious first dinner date in a Japanese restaurant. But ineluctably, the memories came to seem indistinguishable from imagination. Once every connection with your past life falls away, you are left with only your presence in the dirty room. There is one relief: nothing is expected of you, you have no responsibilities, you are at ultimate and absolute liberty. But it is the liberty of a man immured in an indifferent mausoleum, awaiting his own extinction.

I cannot say that the isolation cell is the only way to attain even this unhallowed understanding of freedom. As an adolescent, I had already formed an idea of its peril, in the condition of error: alone in a room, checking my incorrect mathematics answer again and again, unable to detect any mistake, and yet seeing my error immediately once it was pointed out to me. Without my father to correct me, I thought, I might have forever remained in error. There is a moment, moreover, in Kafka’s last novel, The Castle, that captures the very emptiness of freedom taken to extremity. The protagonist accomplishes his escape from others, only to find himself estranged in his victory:
It seemed to K. as if at last these people had broken off all relations with him, and as if now in reality he were freer than he had ever been, and at liberty to wait in this place, usually forbidden to him, as long as he desired, and had won a freedom such as hardly anybody else had ever succeeded in winning, and as if nobody could dare to touch him or drive him away, or even speak to him; but — this conviction was at least equally strong — as if at the same time there was nothing more senseless, nothing more hopeless, than this freedom, this waiting, this inviolability.

I read these words in segregation — with recognition. I laughed. In prison as in no other human affliction is there so fundamental and sustained a rupture of human solidarity, so seamless a sense of enmity.

The hell of other people can reach delirious extremes even in segregation. Perhaps especially in segregation. Bad neighbours are nuisances in ordinary life, but the prisoner in a neighbouring cell is never more than a few feet away, and if he is insane, as is often enough the case, life quickly becomes maniacal. A deranged Vietnam vet (if his ravings may be relied upon) once ranted next door to me in an intensive management unit for weeks on end, before being released directly into the free world. Another prisoner, Somali Ali (as he called himself), the first neighbour I had in the King County Jail, was hardly more than a boy, but already long gone. He took me for a liar when I told him I’d been imprisoned six years already, because his head was filled with tales of brutality of incarceration inevident on me. Then he launched into a practised and deafening tirade — “I’m a mothafuckin’ savage, I’m built for this shit” — that went on for days, and which I had to endure without even the mild amelioration of earplugs, which were banned in the jail. He alternated beating upon the wall with emitting scraping sounds that, he assured me, were from the crafting of a shank for the moment when we might come into contact. At one point, he tried to pour liquid through a crack in the wall, before I sealed it with toothpaste and newspaper. Eventually, he attacked a prisoner who was cutting his hair, and they took him elsewhere. A year later, he was shot to death in the prison yard at Walla Walla when he wouldn’t end his assault on another prisoner. By sheer coincidence, my attorney at the time had once been his; it transpired that Ali had been brought to America from Somalia for sexual exploitation by an American soldier. He had been shunted through Washington State’s foster system and its juvenile prisons before being graduated to the adult variety.

To talk of freedom and spirit is obscene here; the lesson impressed upon me most forcefully is how utterly our ears render us the prisoners of others. The eye’s lid has no counterpart in the ear. Not even the best earplugs will do for hearing what we do for vision whenever we, mercifully, shut our eyes.

It is rage rather than freedom that I have come to understand most in prison. I was always more disposed to laughter than to anger, and thought fury a brazen confession of moronic monstrosity. But fury is not so alien to me today. I sometimes wonder how the free might feel if they could know what feelings the prisons they have built can inspire in those forced to live in them. There is no respite from fury in prison. I now need only think of certain things, and hatred from tiny points engulfs the world. When I think of years spent lying awake from the cold, though there were piles of blankets ready; when I think of the years spent without a note of music, though forced to listen to vulgar conversations yelled from cell to cell in the night; when I think of the boorish bureaucrats manipulating the mechanisms of misery with their misspelled memos; when I think of the years without dental floss; when I think of these years wasted by the complacent and comfortable, by the ignorant and the indifferent; when I think of all this completely unnecessary cruelty and then of that world that can find it possible to be upset over desserts that do not turn out right at Christmas — then rage unfolds, and it is possible to wish to bring down the world in ruins.

PreviousPage 3 of 4Next
39 comment(s)

Bev BidermanMarch 14, 2011 23:24 EST

Atif Rafay\'s article left me sickened and scared for him. I checked out the website that his supporters maintain and it does appear that he has been terribly wrongly convicted. I wonder if there is something that Walrus readers can do.

Sean BradfordMarch 17, 2011 09:45 EST

I truly loved wading through this man's carefully constructed essay. I wish his lawyer and him the best, for it is all I can do. Godspeed.

Tom March 18, 2011 16:11 EST

self indulgent garbage.

Victims?

terryMarch 18, 2011 20:50 EST

Had his philo on lock down loved that, been a while since ive read anything from the heart. My heart goes out to him separte from his involvment in the crime or lack there of. To understand subjective existance is a very hard thing to accept, i cannot imagine the pain mundaine routine causes in an endless prision sentence.

Aunt JemimaMarch 18, 2011 20:51 EST

No patience for this. It's unfortunate that this so-called 'prodigy' won't have a chance to grow up. If only he hadn't acted SO weird after his parents were murdered- i.e. weird enough that anyone would convict him.

MaryMarch 19, 2011 10:33 EST

This was a fascinating read. Rafay is clearly brilliant. That does not, however, mean that he was wrongly convicted. Nor do his assertions that he was. That will be determined on appeal.

fujikatsMarch 19, 2011 20:04 EST

I wouldn't be too quick to take to heart Atif's essay. He certainly knows how to use big words, enough to confuse most readers. The facts of the case do not lean to the innocence of Sebastian and Atif. The crime committed was a vicious, horrific, violent act against Atif's parents and
handicapped sister. What could be more terrible. Whether he swung the weapon or not, Atif has been convicted of organizing and enabling this horrible crime. I have no doubt that living one's life in prison is everything terrible and awful as Atif describes it. And, why should it not be? It could never be as terrible as what his family endured. And they don't get to talk about their experience or agonize over it's value to their humanness. They are dead.

PanamaHatMarch 21, 2011 22:00 EST

What a surprise—prison is a drag?! Hmmm, I wonder why...

By the way, the writer needs an editor, badly.

JeremyMarch 24, 2011 14:05 EST

Why can't we separate his guilt/innocence from the brilliance of the essay?

It's still an erudite and coherent meditation on freedom and discipline that discusses the situation in which all prisoners find themselves, regardless of guilt or innocence.

And to Rafay's, he just grazes the possibility of his innocence with the discussion of Dostoevsky – it's not like the essay screams, "I didn't do it! Free me!"

And as much as academia gets caught up in polysyllabic buzzwords, sometimes big words better describe complex concepts than short anglo-saxon words.

kramerMarch 24, 2011 20:35 EST

I don't know how much of this Atif actually wrote himself, but it seems like he's trying way too hard to look smart.

Too much fancy language, sentences were too long. It requires too much work for the reader, Like panamahat said, some editing could have made this a much more enjoyable article.

expoMarch 30, 2011 08:54 EST

This essay is not well-written. I agree with the other commentators who noted that.

Well-written prose does not require this level of effort to decipher. It seems like an attempt to sound intelligent. When something is written well, the reader knows that it is well-written but also takes pleasure in reading it.

By the way, why would someone confess to a "mobster" that he killed his family, and then later say that he didn't do it and was coerced into doing so. I don't buy it.

EdMarch 30, 2011 16:44 EST

I got 3 pages in and put it down. Unreadable.

AMarch 31, 2011 14:58 EST

Expo, 25% of the DNA exoneration cases in the United States — that's one in four — encompassed innocent defendants who made incriminating statements, confessions, or guilty pleas. Why do innocent people confess? For any multitude of factors; the mind works in mysterious ways. Educate yourself on Mr. Bigs. Educate yourself on false confessions and erroneous admissions of guilt.

The criminal justice system is operated by humans. Humans make mistakes. I'm always baffled by how the general public is quick to assume and assert that because a person is convicted, he or she must indeed be guilty of the crime, and should, for that reason, be locked up in deplorable and inhumane conditions. Educate yourself on wrongful convictions, because, sadly, they happen all too often.

If the essay was not preceded by an introduction of the author to the reader, I imagine most people then would have found themselves able to read the work for its substance, without the encroachment of their overarching prejudice, predisposition, and preconceived notions. If you set your opinions as to Rafay's guilt or innocence aside — if you'd note that his essay doesn't once refer to the crime of which he was convicted, or whether he did or did not commit it — you'd realize that his essay talks about freedom, sure, but also about the ineffable conditions of this country's prison system. My take-away on freedom (whatever meaning you attribute to the word) is that it is something so misapprehended, incomprehensible, underestimated, and taken for granted in this world. As far as penal policy goes, it seems Canadians are content to say that the moment you are convicted of a crime, your inalienable human rights are surrendered, and you cease to be human altogether. Educate yourself on the lamentable conditions, corruption, and powertripping that take place behind the walls. [Justice Behind the Walls is a good book with which to start.] But even if you don't care about how prisoners are treated, keep in mind that the vast majority of them will eventually be released back into society. Think about the kind of person the thick air of rage brewing inside a prison will generate.

In my opinion, this essay is incredibly well written. I read each word with care and assiduousness, often rereading sentences and paragraphs, not because it was unreadable, but just to take it all in again. His language seems like a product of the literature and authors he reads. I'm not mad at that.

But my opinions aside, the Walrus Foundation has an educational mandate. Keep an open mind when reading. Compartmentalize any bias, and, above all, educate yourself.

16April 04, 2011 12:36 EST

Well-written read. Thanks.

BrendanApril 06, 2011 16:29 EST

I am outraged by the dismissive critiques offered by some in this comment section. There can be no greater contrast in insight between Mr Rafay and the likes of those who would diminish the value of this work.

Guilt or innocence aside, this was wonderfully written. There is some merit in using language that is accessible to a wider audience, but there is also value in the tone taken by this author. I am certain that anyone who thinks this unreadable would say the same of Dostoevsky.

If you are threatened by writers who have the audacity to speak eloquently, you are only denying yourself the very legitimate aesthetic of \'fancy language.\'

Well done Mr. Rafay, I was incredibly moved by this essay.

LizApril 07, 2011 21:00 EST

Depictions of prison (in _The Shawshank Redemption_ and Camus's _The Outsider_ , for example) have often led me to romanticise. How stoical I would be in prison! How nice to have my days structured so that I could devote myself to reading or to thinking! Rafay's article, which I found dense but well-written and very thought-provoking, shook these assumptions to the core.

I was particularly moved by his self-description as "wretched" in the final section. It is important to remember to care for the most vulnerable and suffering members of society, and not only because it is entirely plausible that, by some twist of fate, we could end up being one of them.

KBApril 10, 2011 22:19 EST

I think it fair to say that this essay really is poorly written. Does Rafay try to look intelligent to engender our sympathy? I see no reason to presume this. The essayist drops names and buzzwords in the fashion of someone who has read a lot but had little opportunity to discuss what he has read with others and wants to be recognized, such as a literate prisoner. When he is not showing off to the class, Rafay makes a handful of valid and enlightening points about the experience of a life sentence (which he has had ample opportunity to discuss). Whether Rafay is guilty or not is beside the point; there surely are innocent people in his situation, and is it so much better if the prisoner is guilty?

AnonymousApril 14, 2011 00:37 EST

I immensely enjoyed reading Atif Rafay\'s meditation on freedom while living in prison. It is a subtle, nuanced, thoughtful, painful, introspective and ultimately enlightening piece that asks the reader to imagine dimensions of freedom from a perspective most of us don\'t often get to contemplate. I\'m thankful that The Walrus showed the wisdom in giving the essay a prominent play in its April edition. Of course, I am grateful that Atif Rafay shared his contemplations with us and hope that he will continue to write and share.

CasperApril 18, 2011 21:31 EST

Thank you Tom. Concise and effective.

What most people seem to be missing is that a common trait of true psychopaths is their ability to appear sympathetic or even charismatic. It's one of the chief tools they use to draw you in.

Rafay's victims know better, they've learned it the hard way. The fortunate ones get to live on haunted by that lesson. May the less fortunate ones rest in peace.

Ken April 25, 2011 19:16 EST

Casper (presumably not the ghost, although he knows what the dead think) writes that "a common trait of true psychopaths is their ability to appear sympathetic or even charismatic." And what if a person actually is sympathetic or even charismatic? Does that make of him/her a psychopath? How does Casper know that Rafay is a psychopath? Because Rafay is sympathetic. (Had the state in its wisdom judged Burns and Rafay to be psychopaths, they would have been found not guilty due to insanity.) It seems to me that the chief trait of a psychopath is to believe things that have no basis in reality.

PMay 03, 2011 10:19 EST

Thanks for giving us a channel to publicly communicate to you our feelings. Not about your pseudo-intellectual rubbish, but about how society looks upon the likes of you, JW Gacy and other depraved, utterly loathesome, irredeemable human excrement who will never again experience pure joy, love and goodness in in this life or any. I just keep thinking of the sickening thunk that aluminum bat must have made as your buddy made a bloody mash of your poor, helpless kid sister's head, and how you laughed about it while relaying it to the undercover police. I have a feeling that when you finally realize the eternal reality you have signed up for, life in prison will seem like a walk in the park.

DonnaMay 05, 2011 13:47 EST

Aunt Jemima - yes, so true. In this world we judge people not by their actions, but by whether they fit into our ideas of "normal." How disgusting we are.

Atif and Sebastian are in prison and the killer walks free. All the Canadian "know it alls" on this website should have attended the trial, like I did, if they wanted the truth. But they don't want that, that would be too unpleasant. Their fantasy helps them feel like they are better than this "guy who knows too many words."

DonnaMay 05, 2011 13:48 EST

"Have no fear of robbers or murderers. They are external dangers, petty dangers. We should fear ourselves. Prejudices are the real robbers; vices the real murderers. "

Victor Hugo

PMay 05, 2011 21:47 EST

If I were a juror at his trial, I would have condemned him just for talking about the murders to the fake mobsters the way he did — in a jovial, flippant manner. Scared for my life or not, I would never have desecrated the memory of my beloved, recently murdered family that way. It showed an utter lack of affection and respect. The defense that he was play-acting only damns him more, for if he could so effortlessly act that callous, belying his supposed inner agony, then he is conversely capable of playing the meek, bereaved son and brother he purported to be in court.

Rafay, please do keep the descriptions of your misery and discomfort coming. It's the only satisfaction any decent human being will ever get out of this sordid and tragic tale.

JHKMay 06, 2011 11:02 EST

Atif,

You guys are still my Bros. I'm still with you. Most people have no clue what is going on in this upside down world. God Willing, we will see each other at the light at the end of the tunnel, everything will turn out ok, and we can laugh together about who God finally chooses to punish (Bush, Obama, Rothschilds, Bilderbergers, Royal Family). Peace (Of Mind).

Jimmy

PMay 06, 2011 11:02 EST

It's 3:23 a.m. in Manhattan and I just got home from a Cinco de Mayo party. Now, I think I'll get a snack and a drink at my local, downstairs. I've got a full day of meeting friends and other fun things tomorrow. The forecast is for a glorious, sunny Friday, and we're going to have a picnic in Central Park. It's times like these that make me glad that I'm not in prison for MURDERING MY FAMILY.

Happy Friday, Rafay.

PMay 06, 2011 11:03 EST

C'mon Rafay. Admit it. You were ashamed of them. They didn't measure up to your 'westerness' and 'erudition.' You and Sebastian are specially gifted, aren't you? Admit it, already. I would have been ashamed of them, too!

The difference between you and the 99.999999 percent of humans you despise? They, and I, wouldn't have killed their own flesh and blood.

That cold little cell is a fitting container for your grandiose ego.

PMay 06, 2011 11:03 EST

"Have no fear or robbers or mruderers."

Ok, Donna. Good luck with that ...

PMay 06, 2011 11:03 EST

Ken,

I can't even begin to address your post to you, as I think it futile. Get an education, if it's not too late. But I would like to state this for the rest of the readers.

Psychopaths are aware of the reality normal people subscribe to. They just don't think it applies to them. Think Hitler, Gacy, Bundy. I think Ken is thinking of 'psychotics."

DonnaMay 10, 2011 11:52 EST

P - You know a lot of psychopaths, and to me, you sound like one as well. Who else glories in the discomfort of others. The mirror awaits.

I do notice that you igore FACTS like they are MAGGOTS and grasp on "normalcy" as if it were gold. That explains a lot about you and your desperate little posts. If the only way you can feel better about yourself is to say "at least I didn't murder my family" then I really wish you all the luck in the world. You need it.

PMay 10, 2011 16:20 EST

Who revels in the discomfort of others? Sadistic murderers, of which I'm not one.

You are the company you keep.

ken klonskyMay 10, 2011 22:49 EST

Why is P so angry and full of hate? If he doesn't agree with an opinion or idea, he gets personal. "Get an education, if it's not too late." As to his statement, "Psychopaths are aware of the reality normal people subscribe to. They just don't think it applies to them." I completely agree with both sentences. The second sentence is what makes them delusional.
I would ask P to look at the record he has left here, and then suggest that he calm down.

PMay 11, 2011 13:07 EST

Easily misled apologists for evil, manipulative people make me angry. They are dangerousnd. Celebrity worship of murderers upsets me.

DMPMay 20, 2011 16:07 EST

P,

How can you be so sure of your opinion on who committed the murder? I hope the young men are innocent, as they claim. But I would never excuse evil. You are upset? - It would upset ME in turn, if based on my hope you would call me a worshiper of celebrity murderers.

How can anyone pass judgment on the author's erratic tape-recorded behavior mere months after the murders? In addition to feeling threatened, has anyone ever experienced a scene that this 18 year old has experienced, where the butchered were his own family? Has anyone lost his family in this manner? How can a person claim any expertise on what the "normal" behavior in such circumstances should have been?

I am very glad I can NOT claim to know what I would have done, and how I would have acted.

The essay is an invaluable source of insight about prison life. I too love Nietzsche. I too do not suffer fools easily. Yet I never even killed a cockroach, of whom there were many in my dormitory while a university student.

It is good to refrain form judgment, especially of those, who do not like us, bored philistines. Our senses may have lost their sharpness, provided they have ever had any. We may simply be biased.

bmoreverJuly 07, 2011 14:51 EST

Atif appears to be confused by thinking that prison is for the purpose exacting "punishment" when he speaks of its failures in that regard. Atif, prison is a place to keep me safe from you and your ilk.

Atif was not convicted on the basis of his confessions alone. Ask the prior commenter "JHK" whether Atif executed his entire family or not. Jimmy Miyoshi (who has changed his name to James Hiroshi Kira) knew well of Atif and Sebastian's plans to kill the Rafays for life insurance money. He testified against his friends (not willingly) and notwithstanding the a claim (weak that it is) that he was "forced" to, he admits their guilt again, under no apparent threat, as recently as two months ago here: http://crimint.wordpress.com/2011/03/11/james-hiroshi-kira-responds/#respond

Donna, your little blog was as irrelevant and uniformed at the time of the trial as your comments are here.

otropogoDecember 04, 2011 21:29 EST

This is the most eloquent critique of our Anglo-American system of justice I have ever read.

The author's guilt or innocence of the crime of which he's been convicted has no bearing on his observations, which shine a searing light on the utter moral bankruptcy of our society.

When animals are treated in the manner described, even inadvertently, a hue and cry goes up, and righteous people bestir themselves to confront and punish the perpetrators. How then can such systemic torture be inflicted by "public servants" on human beings? It seems we need a Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Human Beings.

Whether we know it or not, we all live in the hell described by Atif Rafay. Those of us whose eyes and ears are sometimes open cannot help but perceive it in the malice of police, prosecutors, judges, social workers, and legions of other bureaucrats who revel in the sadistic abuse of their powers, and in the sheepish demeanor of the majority (one hopes) who merely look the other way and robotically rally to the defense of their brutal colleagues.

But even those for whom this reality never rises to consciousness cannot avoid it. The unconscious mind is never asleep to the presence of danger. And this may account for the angry ad hominem attacks on the author.

When one is paralyzed by fear, it is so much easier to side with the torturer than the victim.

The irony is that this Anglo-American culture, so dominant in the world today, still parades its pride in having defeated Hitler's police state, and is so unmindful of its own monstrously disproportionate cowardice, absent concentrations camps, or an Eastern Front, as to persist in castigating the citizens of the Third Reich for failing to vigorously oppose the Nazi regime.

BMOREVERDecember 27, 2011 13:37 EST

Atif is not someone who was born into a culture of poverty and incarceration. He bears no resemblance to many of the men he is housed with in prison. He is not a product of his environment, like so many other inmates who share his world. Whether Atif ever admits it to himself or anyone else, he is responsible for the slaughter of his innocent family. He is a coward. He is a monster. He is not a reflection of the problems in our criminal justice system. Pick a different poster boy Otropogo.

MartinDecember 28, 2011 13:38 EST

i recommend to everyone to watch the documental on discovery channel about this case... and research more information... but people get blindfolded by this guy who kill his own family...

i can't believe that actually are people who think they are inocents... the way they act after the murder...not even going to the funeral?, how they make sure that everybody notice them that night anywhere they went on that nigh..( a $5.00 dollars plate and leave $ 8bucks or been so loud on the theatre and screaming) so they make sure ppl will remember them,when actually they commit the murder in the midle of the dinner and cinema, also they try to make it look like it was a robery so when they were cuestionated about what happend this guy said he notice his music device was missing... who buys that?not me..i don't buy it i am not stupid, you just found your family murdered and then you notice that? also how in the world would you refuse to help police when they travel to canada and this guy close the door on their face saying is was no going to talk to them and he was gonna get a lawer? why you don't want to help to find who killed your family? because you did it!!!

How in the world can you laugh when you tell the story about killing your family regardless of mr big set up still sebastian goes : the only part that was kinda hard it was the girld cause she was moving from one way to another covering ...and then right there both Atif Rafay and Sebastian Burns laughed (remeber that atif's sister had a severe grade of authism)...even if you didn't kill them how can you laugh about that? ther is no way! they laughed because they kill them! people here you need ot wake up and realize that is serious that you are in favor of this 2 monsters... is something to really think about... all of you who think they a re innocents...you should get more information about this case...and obviously not info from those websites made by Tiffany burns (sebastian's sister) or the one from atif. i really hope they spend their rest of their life in miserable condition...ps: sorry for my english but is my third lenguage.

also in a ceremony offered in canada for this 3 souls... Atif get out of the ceremony when the ceremony was far from ending and then he was acting like a liltle kid running into a car and laughing really hard??? really???? and they were refusing to talk to media right in the beggin to the ceremony a reporter ask them why they keep denying talk to the midia? they didnt respond and moments later is when atif get out of the building laughing and running into a car and all laughing inside the car... you really have to be mentaly retarded to think they didn't do it... seriously people you can not be so blindfolded!!!!

philipJanuary 02, 2012 22:00 EST

Rafay is not trying to act or sound any smarter than he actually is. He is not the pseudo-intellectual he\'s being accused of. He talks that way everyday, all the time. (and yes, it can be a bit of a put off).
I served awhile with him in a maximum security institution in Washington state. I don\'t know if he is innocent as he claims to be, or not. My hunch is that he\'s absolutely dead fucking guilty. I do know however, that his take on freedom is completely non-abstract. As any of us would immediately have when serving a triple-life sentence.
Please try not to get distracted with his guilt or innocence, but focus on his being a kind of de-facto expert on the subject.
But hey, you would be too -if you whacked your parents...

Comment on this article
  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
March 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Laughs
Search the web, support the Walrus Foundation
COPA