The Farms Are Not All Right

The growing gap between what they produce and what they earn is driving many farmers off the land. The crisis in Canadian farming
If it wasn’t the latest GPS technology, it was a new combine; the year before, they were forced to put $150,000 into the motor and pumps that regulate the irrigation system from a cluster of sheds on the far side of the pond. Byron estimated their annual gross revenues at just shy of $1 million, and after expenses that left just enough to keep the two families in reasonable comfort. They had work enough, though, for at least three.

Yet they have continued to thrive, in part because of the anomalies, not the regularities — starting with Arthur passing on his farm to his son. The average age of a Canadian farmer is fifty-seven and climbing, and the thin profit margins make it difficult to cut up the equity and fade into retirement. Plus there are far fewer risks and much more money to be made in the city — or, around here, in the oil patch — than in farming.

But for whatever reason, Byron has known since his teens that he wanted to farm, and for all the headaches he loves the work — the diversity of it, the profound absence of monotony. One day, he was a tractor operator, the next a mechanic or an accountant. They sometimes sold their wheat while it was still in the ground — a relatively new approach brokered by the Canadian Wheat Board — and so some days Byron was a sort of day trader, too. And throughout, he was a highly skilled agronomist, tracking the weather and watching for invasive volunteer flax from last season among the new wheat shoots, selecting just the right mix of herbicides from a catalogue as thick as a phone book. “That’s one thing about farming,” he said. “It takes a tremendously wide scope of knowledge.”

Other anomalies: the Jaqueses have been more zealous than most about dodging debt — it represents less than 10 percent of their revenue, about half the national average — and they’ve shied away from buying up every adjacent quarter section (a quarter of a square mile, or about sixty-five hectares) they could get a mortgage on. They practise meticulous crop rotation, which helps reduce their dependence on nitrogen fertilizer and other petrochemical inputs. And the irrigation system leaves them much less vulnerable than the vast majority of farmers to variations in weather and climate.

For all of that, the Jaqueses have remained acutely aware of the tight margins, the escalating input costs, the sense of running at a dead sprint just to stay where they are. “That’s the trouble with agriculture: where it’s going to end,” said Arthur. “I kind of worry about where the hell people are going to come from to keep agriculture going.”

The weekend after my visit to Jaques Farm, I took my family to the Asparagus Festival at Edgar Farms outside of Innisfail, a town about an hour’s drive up Highway 2 from Calgary. The farm is a minor legend among area farmers’ markets and locavore restaurants, for its crisp, sweet asparagus spears, and the Edgars, another multi-generational Alberta farming family, have come to acknowledge their crop’s fame by throwing a spring party in the shadow of their silos each year.

Farmers’ market stalls are the closest I come with any regularity to the origins of my food. I’m heartened by the foreshortened supply chain they represent, imagining them as the sole consumer arms of the farms themselves. I buy my bundles of Edgar’s superb produce in season, often straight from the hands that harvested it, and I flatter myself in the belief that, when it comes to asparagus at least, I’ve provided a complete answer to the question of how else to make and buy and eat food. The story down on the farm, of course, is much more complex.

As we turned off the range road into the Edgars’ farmyard, we were greeted heartily by Asparaguy — a young man, that is, in a mascot-like costume that extended several feet above his head, transforming him into a jovial, anthropomorphic asparagus spear. In the farmyard beyond, a tidy marketplace was set up, with vendors peddling homemade asparagus soup, grilled asparagus with three kinds of dip, and pottery and handicrafts, as well as a large market stall overflowing with tidy bundles of fresh Edgar Farms asparagus and other local produce. There was also a petting zoo, a face painting stall, and a straw bale maze. Every thirty minutes or so, a tractor pulling a long, low flatbed lined with straw bale benches returned from the fields to pick up another load of gawkers for a farm tour.

A neighbouring farmer drove the tractor while Elna Edgar delivered a tour guide’s spiel via a wireless headset. The Edgar family had been farming the land around us since 1907, but as Doug and Elna’s kids headed off to pursue university degrees and urban lives, the couple had come to think they might be the last to do so. Elna told us that when their daughter Kerri came back to the farm with a new husband, Randy, keen to work the land for another generation, “you could’ve knocked me over with a feather.” They had already been trying to diversify their business — they first planted asparagus on a single acre in 1986 — but with a much longer time horizon now in sight, they redoubled their efforts.

As we passed one of the farm’s warehouse-sized utility sheds, Elna directed our attention to the combine inside. “There are two problems with traditional farming,” she said. “The first is that a combine costs about as much as a house. The second is that someone else tells you what your product is worth.”

Asparaguy notwithstanding, Edgar Farms has long been and remains primarily a commercial grain and cattle farm. The asparagus fields cover about eleven hectares, and another small patch has been given over to market vegetables. But on the rest, just shy of 500 hectares, they grow wheat and canola and raise beef — globally traded market commodities, their prices set according to an elaborate calculus that might, at any given harvest time, include real demand and futures market speculation, grain shortages in Africa, wildfires in Russia, or dwindling water reserves in India. Grain grown in Innisfail is tethered inextricably to an agricultural economy that is never less than continental in size, part of a worldwide food system under such stress that by comparison the collapse of Canadian hog farming looks more like a prelude than an outlier.

In December 2010, the United Nations Food Price Index hit an all-time high; the very next month, it broke that record, and broke it yet again in February 2011. The reason is as simple as an introductory economics seminar: demand is intensifying at the same moment as supply has reached a plateau and begun to suffer frequent and intense contractions. The upward spike in price has been precipitated by a list of factors that reads like a shorthand description of globalization itself, including population growth, newly affluent consumer bases in populous developing nations like China and India, and a global boom in biofuels that has enticed farmers into the energy business.

At the same time, supply has dwindled under the excesses of the same system. Diminishing returns on the fossil-fuelled, capital-intensive processes that expanded supply to global scale in the first place have begun to occur even as those processes push the system into the range of certain absolute ecological limits. Globally, wheat and rice production is growing more slowly than population for the first time since the 1950s, when agriculture’s green revolution introduced high-yield grain varieties, industrial equipment, and petrochemical inputs to the world’s poor. (By one recent estimate, nearly 50 percent of the world’s population now relies wholly on petrochemically derived nitrogen fertilizer for its daily bread.) And what viable farmland remains is now threatened the world over by encroaching urbanization, widespread speculation in commodity market derivatives, and a rapidly expanding wave of straight-up land grabs. In the developing world, more than 20 million hectares of farmland — an area three times the size of Ireland — has been gobbled up by foreign investors in the past five years.

The biosphere, meanwhile, may be unable to sustain much more growth in mouths to feed and arable land to feed them. One reason global demand for grain has soared is that increasing water scarcity is reducing food supply. This past February, the Chinese government provided more than $1 billion in emergency aid to its agricultural heartland, where two-thirds of the wheat harvest was lost to drought. In Punjab, India’s breadbasket, the water table is plummeting by more than half a metre per year, nitrogen fertilizer use has increased dramatically, and the Ministry of Environment and Forests has baldly declared its current agricultural model “unsustainable and non-profitable.” The wave of unrest that has redrawn the political map of the Middle East over the past year traces its origins in significant measure to soaring food prices and water scarcity. (Just months before Egyptians took to the streets to overthrow the government of Hosni Mubarak, the Associated Press reported that half the country was relying on government-subsidized bread.)

“Around the world,” the Economist declared in February, “the food system is in crisis.” Lester Brown, founder of the Worldwatch Institute, put it even more emphatically: “The world is now one poor harvest away from chaos in world grain markets.” France, which holds the G20 presidency this year, has made food security a top priority for meetings among the world’s most powerful economies.

Previous · Page 3 of 5 · Next

7 comment(s)

Jim HairSeptember 20, 2011 11:32 EST

Great article, from a farm perspective, it's very even handed and informative.

Just one thing, the cow milk production per year would be 8,500-9,500 Kilograms/year, not tonnes.

Pamela DixonOctober 02, 2011 11:01 EST

Last week I went to my local Calgary co-op and noticed that not one of the apples had a Canadian passport. To be honest, I was a little disappointed and made the decision not to make baked apples this week.

Why can't we buy apples from B.C.? Why do I have to drive an hour to get to a local farmer's market?

This article answered a lot of the questions I had. I look forward to reading more about the shift towards locally produced, sustainable farming in the future.

Mary EllenOctober 04, 2011 16:47 EST

Thank you for presenting farming as it really is. I am curious though, do the farms presented in this story have off farm income? 90% of North American farms have off farm income, supplementing their farms to provide food for the masses. The David Suzuki Foundation issued a report several months ago that small farms can produce more per acre, employ more people, use less fossil fuel etc that large scale counterparts.
The problems farms face in turning or starting to farm differently is solely financial.
Unless you start with large scale conventional farming there is no money available to grow a smaller scale sustainable and environmentally friendly farm. For more information see www.citypalate.ca article on Slow Money.

Jan SteinmanOctober 04, 2011 16:48 EST

I just about cried when I read of Jan Slomp's premium grass-fed organic milk being mixed into the monopoly milk marketing board stream, which undoubtedly includes antibiotic-laced milk from confinement dairy operations.

Why isn't Slomp standing up with Michael Schmidt and others who put their life savings and livelihood on the line in order to show that another way of producing and thinking about food is possible, let alone necessary?

Don't get me wrong, I deeply appreciate Slomp's deep care that he puts into alternative dairying, but he's so close to making a larger difference than he could possibly make on his own farm.

There is a crying need for quality raw milk out there, and the unholy alliance of milk marketing boards and public health authorities rubs individuals into the ground who try to service this market. Because raw, organic, grass-fed milk is a premium market, conscientious small farmers can make a go of it — in many ways, it's "get small, or get out," because big operations simply cannot provide raw milk in a safe and quality way. And they know this, and they use the government to stifle competition from a product they cannot produce. Amid all the sword-rattling about "free markets," the current situation in dairy is one of stifled innovation.

I hope Jan Slomp sees his way forward to providing his premium product, whether raw, or pasteurized, to people who appreciate it for what it is. Because as long as he's selling to the monopoly milk marketing board, he's part of the problem, not the solution.

JimDickieOctober 04, 2011 16:48 EST

"His yields started to drop, but so did his costs"

That is one of the most important statements in the whole article, and should be used to argue in favour of organic farming to those not aware or concerned with the health risks associated with conventional.

Organic farming can certainly "feed the world" whatever than means, but it can't be applied on industrial scale. For economic, social and ecological reasons, we have to find a way to get back to a network for small, diversified family farms.

Alex GillOctober 05, 2011 16:15 EST

Mr Tuner presents in this article an illuminating insight into the economics of Canadian farming and raises some excellent questions about the economic and ecological sustainability of current practise in an industry that is crucial to the existence of our civilisation. However, I was rather disappointed by his uncritical inclusion of comments on the claimed benefits of raw milk.

As a food safety microbiologist I would not claim to comment knowledgeably on the claimed nutritional benefits of raw milk but I am very aware of the published research on the microbial safety of milk and other dairy products. For the same reasons that milk is an excellent nutritional source for humans, it is an excellent medium for the growth many disease causing bacteria. Prior to the introduction of pasteurisation it was a common cause of exposure to debilitating and lethal bacteria such as Tuberculosis, Brucella, Salmonella and pathogenic Escherichia coli, such as E. coli O157:H7

Unfortunately, though good management practices can be of some benefit in improving the safety of dairy products they can not prevent the contamination of milk by bacteria. Consequently, in Canada and the US there continue to be regular reports of disease outbreaks due to the consumption of raw milk. These outbreaks are rarely reported outside of the public health literature, as they are often limited to an immediate family group, due to the legal restrictions on the distribution of raw milk.

Mandatory pasteurisation was introduced to control the burden of disease and mortality associated with raw milk, a burden that fell heaviest upon infants and children. The success of this policy is demonstrated by the virtual absence of infectious illness attributable to commercially distributed milk and ironically by the calls for the removal of pasteurisation by those who have benefited from it. In this the raw milk enthusiasts are another demonstration of the phenomena noted by Mr Turner of the general ignorance of the underlying processes of a food production.

NoreenNovember 14, 2011 14:17 EST

“For me, that raises food security alarm bells, because every farmer washed out of the system represents farm knowledge and farm skill washed out of the system.”

Without the ability to raise and grow our own food we are at risk. We are left to depend on other countries to feed us. We risk our own independence and put our fate in the hands of countries that will look after their own people first in times of drought or hardship.

This is one of the more troubling issues around the farming industry now. We shouldn't be making ourselves that vunerable however farmers should be making an income that supports them for the work that they do. It is important that we have the ability to support ourselves for future generations.

Add a comment

  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
June 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Foundation National Event Guide

The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone

12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto

The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?

6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary

The Walrus Laughs
The Walrus SoapBox