Brand Me

Gen Y personal branders are clogging Internet browsers with self-portraits, product endorsements, and the minutiae of their days. A Gen-Xer asks if we have any right to hate them
Illustration by Michael Byers

In the competitive field of personal branding, Gregory Gorgeous is considered a champ. His vlogs (like blogs, but with video), which consist mainly of cosmetics tutorials, have generated 25.6 million YouTube views, presumably by people who want to look like a Real Housewife of Orange County. I’ve watched the tilt of his Carol Brady hairdo and the gloss of his Kristen Stewart lips as he offers a lesson on thermal hair spray. “Stay gorgeous!” he says. I’ve also witnessed his account of the night he lost his iPhone in a club, a story that wends, for eight unbearable minutes, along a road to nowhere. Weakly leveraging the “born this way” message of the times, he makes paid and unpaid endorsements (though there’s never any distinction) for his “favourite things,” such as sparkly fuchsia platform pumps and a line called Swedish Skin, in his videos and on officialgregorygorgeous.com.

One of the countless young Canadians seeking fame and fortune in “lifestyle blogging,” Gorgeous kick-started his YouTube semi-celebrity as a bored sixteen-year-old in 2008, then followed a well-worn path to semi-riches: launch a YouTube channel, tweet about yourself (he counts more than 48,000 followers), secure sponsorship from advertisers, bask in the attention. He is part of a digital black hole that’s sucking up the most superficial minds of his generation, including a phalanx of aspiring PR girls who spend all day photographing themselves, a fraternity of party-hearty amateur rappers who hoist red plastic cups in a kind of ne’er-do-well salute, and platinum blondes who go by names like Raymi the Minx, and Lauren O’Nizzle (real name: O’Neil). On Lauren Out Loud, the latter blogs about dyeing her cat’s tail green, and her love of “kitty-cat videos”; this recent Toronto Star intern is now qualified to be, in her words, an “instructor of online journalism at a local college.” At twenty-six, she has a modest 6,200 Twitter followers, but she is a leading Blondebot (also her word) of the personal blogging scene, with a creative signature that does little more than establish how cute she looks in a tank top.

Gorgeous and O’Nizzle are only two of the attention-seeking asteroids careening through the universe of personal branding. What these kids have in common is a goal: to become a new order of quasi-socialite. What they stand for, sadly, is nothing.

This alone should irk the hell out of anyone who is older than they are, and it frequently does, particularly the glib fortysomethings of my peer group, who revel in damning shallowness. My people also profess to distrust all conspicuous self-promoters. So we can find no better target for our ire than kids who self-promote without so much as a product to sell.

But I’ve learned a few things about this axe we’re grinding: First, that protesting their inanity on the Internet is as futile as spearfishing with a toothpick. Second, that lifestyle bloggers haven’t cornered the market on being inane. And finally, that they weren’t just “born this way.” Okay — they were. But all little monsters were spawned by something. And that particular something is my Gen X. That’s right — it’s kind of our fault.

Grown-ups, here are the harsh tokes: We are the ones who made brands out of every nostalgic pop culture totem from Tootsie Rolls to Beavis and Butt-Head. We are the ones who started the irrational obsession with the concept of branding, by reading our copies of No Logo and lobbying for bike lanes while driving our Subarus to Starbucks. (It’s embarrassing when the worst cliché about your peer group is actually true.) We are a generation of both thumb-twiddling and eye-gouging ambition, who spent half of the ’90s resenting the boomers — for soaking up all of the riches and leaving us the scraps — and the other half thrashing around in the deep end of online enterprise.

Our resulting self-obsession encouraged the Millennials’ worst narcissism, yet still we scoff.

By many accounts, the concept of the personal brand was first introduced by marketers Al Ries and Jack Trout (both my parents’ age, as it turns out), with their 1987 book, Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind, in which they advise corporate cogs to use a “positioning strategy to advance your own career.” I was in my twenties when that notion received a major public airing, in a 1997 article in Fast Company, then a new business magazine with its lens tightly focused on tech-driven start-ups. The dot-com universe was booming with overvalued companies that would soon implode, and although most of us didn’t have a clue what the Internet meant, we hoped it would result in gainful employment. The author of the Fast Company piece, management thinker Tom Peters (or “tompeters!” as he brands himself) exhorted readers to develop an indelible mark, like the Nike swoosh or the Starbucks siren. “It’s time for me — and you,” he wrote, “— to take a lesson from the big brands, a lesson that’s true for anyone who’s interested in what it takes to stand out and prosper in the new world of work.” Today his essay reads like Orwellian fiction, an eager fist pump for the commodification of the self. As for the locus of branding’s next boom, Peters identified the Internet.

The tech boom was about young people propelling themselves into the future, but unfortunately we were conditioned to our very core to wait our turn — for a tap on the shoulder that meant we could join the boomers in the traditional job market. Waiting had become a way of life; fearing unknown consequences, we practically invented putting things off. So our response to Peters’ call to arms was conflicted. First, inspiration (“I have to figure out my brand”), followed by panic (“I have to figure out my brand!”), followed by embittered defiance (“Who needs a bloody brand anyway?”).

In the decades after the Fast Company story, we became further discouraged by fear of failure: as people, at work, and eventually as parents. Instead of doing things, we jabbered on about our lives to anyone who would listen, voicing our “takes” more than any previous generation had, a penchant that gave birth to a ubiquitous breed of personal, confessional writing, from “young gal in the big city” columns in print to “young mom coping with Chardonnay” blogs online.

When a new generation appeared on the scene, with new media at their fingertips — and brimming with self-esteem, thanks to their poor, well-intentioned parents — they deftly realized the concepts we struggled to wrap our heads around. The supersize personas that emerged, kids who were self-assured and style obsessed, invited damning generalizations. But I’m looking for reasons to understand the monstrosities we created, and maybe even to cut them a little slack.

Toronto’s Casie Stewart is a pixie blonde with an ardent audience — 50,000 unique visitors to her blog, This Is My Life, and a Twitter following of over 7,000 — that consists of 60 percent young girls. That crowd, she says, tells her all the time how much she inspires them to be “positive” individuals whose purpose is to enjoy “the VIP life.” This entails attending openings and junkets, and promoting products (be they Puma shoes or Virgin America flights), often in return for free stuff. Air New Zealand recently sent Stewart to cover its fashion week, where she drank in the experience of riding around with a car and driver. When we meet, just after the Halloween weekend, she tells me she spent the day working at her friend’s vintage fashion store in downtown Toronto, in exchange for free clothes.

HomePage 1 of 3Next
19 comment(s)

AnonymousJanuary 30, 2012 15:43 EST

bash social media gen-Yers, get free publicity for the walrus, well played maryam, well played. you’d figure she’d pick on someone her own age ;)

AlexJanuary 30, 2012 17:33 EST

Are there really no comments? Is Gen X following its MO? Is Gen Y reading this?

Personally, I not sure I’ve really encountered this subset of my supposed generation (Y). Maybe its the field I’m in (design), but I see a lot more initiative being taken to realize ideas that my peers truly believe in, whether its a business or a personal project.

What I personally don’t see is a generation driven to self-promotion without a larger cause, sense of purpose, or direction. If anything, I see the promotion of ideas over the promotion of self.

So, I definitely have to say thanks! I really appreciate the perspective on what I haven’t been exposed to.

What I ask now is: what can you say about what I do see? Because there’s definitely another side to this.

And what about this group? http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/162/generation-flux-future-of-business

AlexJanuary 30, 2012 17:33 EST

(Apologies to Anonymous. I didn’t see your comment, as I was reading/posting.)

Gen X, really?January 30, 2012 17:33 EST

don't you have 'children' to pick on? these young people are the future of our media, why cut them down?

AntsJanuary 31, 2012 00:02 EST

It's curious that Ms. Sanati views herself as so different (a whole generation different!) from the writers and bloggers profiled in this piece. Many of her contemporaries in Toronto media (for example, Leah McLaren, Rebecca Eckler, Russell Smith) made names for themselves with an identical navel-gazing, over-sharing style of writing. They (and she, I assume) also attended and attend social events and, perhaps, accept a PR gift every once in a while too. It's true that social media has made it possible for an individual unaffiliated with a traditional press outlet to be as exposed and spoiled as his or her columnist cousins but that's a story about old media vs. new media snobbery and not the condescending tale of personal branding published here.

Poet ScientistJanuary 31, 2012 00:02 EST

Don't worry darlings, no one reads the Walrus anyways.

Simon PlashkesJanuary 31, 2012 08:41 EST

Brand Me is an unapologetic generational confession (damnation revelry, embrace of isolation, and persistent self-loathing) masked as a poor critique of kids these days. Shouldn’t this approach be below Maryam Sanati, Editorial Director, Toronto Life Magazine? Maybe it’s a generational thing.

In far less than a sprawling 3,300 words, here’s the deal:

The point has been missed. Examples shared aren’t just shallow self-promotion; they are expressions of collective storytelling and group identity creation. While the emphasis at the top is on ‘personal branding’, it’s really mass self-determination and continuous reinvention experimenting faster than we’ve ever seen. (Sounds a whole lot better than pick your breakfast club clique and stick with it, ya?).

Discussed here is only the tip of the iceberg – what really matters is a follow-on effect of self-expression and identity experimentation for billions of people. And those called out in Brand Me are cultural evolution and expression leaders. Is it too shallow and banal? Do posts fail to live up to the (supposed) editorial rigor of Toronto Life and the Walrus? That’s a matter of opinion – for many, the backstage view is even more prized than the polished final product. We get to see the artist at work, to learn her trade of aspirational self-creation.

Proficiency in aspirational self-creation is a good thing! For the simple reason that people usually aspire to be better than they are, we should praise that which empowers people to do this better.

Ah, but the real excitement is what comes next. What will millions of people (of all ages), now highly experienced in creating themselves and the world around decide to manifest? How will a network of empathetic connection (clearly missing in GenX) influence our cultural next? Hint: better solutions to isolation, global community, empathy.

It takes real guts to stand up to the world, open the doors, and say: “I am not sure who I am yet, but do you want to watch me figure it out?” Those who can, contribute to fast and connected cultural evolution, and do their best to make a better world along the way. Thanks Casie, Raymi, Lauren, Gregory, Sarah, Nolan for your open hearts and stories.

Can’t do it? Don’t want to watch? You could always play a GenX role: “hapless bystander to the extraordinary events of our time”. With that choice, maybe you should log in join the team. You might just make a better you.

Oh, and Maryam, your personal brand? Out of touch, isolated, and proud of it.

sp
@plashkes

that girlJanuary 31, 2012 08:41 EST

I suppose I'm part of this Generation Y. I don't feel like I brand myself, nor do I have a public blog. All those insecurities and fears that you say you had, I also have. I am just now starting to feel comfortable with myself, and that takes time. There will always be people who put themselves out there...but for most of us, I think it takes a long time to be who you really are and feel free to express who you are to the world, however you choose to. Props to those people who are expressing their true selves, even if they go about it in an odd manner. To those who "brand" themselves in an attempt to be popular, i wish they would realize it is a short road...however, I can't say that I'm any better, sitting in my corner of the world, not venturing outside, spending all my time on reddit and facebook, not having exciting adventures. Personally, it sounds really nice to have exciting things to do, and blog about.

Anyway, I'm getting there slowly. I wish everyone could have a self-affirming journey. Sounds silly, but there's a really good TED talk about this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=X4Qm9cGRub0 It's about living your life from a place of worthiness (she calls it Wholeheartedness). I feel lucky to be finding my worth, even if I do think it is a little late at age 25 to be beginning.

LauraJanuary 31, 2012 13:25 EST

Such a long article just so the author can hear herself complain about something she could never achieve herself.

RobJanuary 31, 2012 17:17 EST

What a sad little article.

It's true what one commenter said - this reeks of a ploy to gain some reads and is no doubt fueled by the gnawing sensation in the writer's belly that they have missed the digital boat entirely.

Taking shots across the bow of people you have never spoken to (I note that there isn't a single interview or quote aside from what you pulled from their sites) isn't just sad - it's poor journalism.

The article is a weird mix - at times indignant and disdainful of the self-promoting culture, and at others attempts to take credit for it. "Oh this self-obsessed culture sucks and it's our fault, but that makes it ok to denigrate these kids."

Is there perhaps a sense of jealousy? That these young people have accomplished something that you're still trying to work out yourself?

And hey if we want to be petty and take shots at people without actually speaking to them, let's do a quick google search for 'Maryam Sanati', shall we?

- A twitter account that was registered but never used (possible that it isn't you, have to keep these things in mind).

- The only actual articles with your name attached are about sex (the only thing that sells more papers than self-promotion is sex promotion, after all) and how 'your' generation gets more plastic surgery than anyone else: "...they just want to kind of recapture their youth and the physique that they had," Sanati said. "More than that, it's really the boomer market that's driving plastic surgery."

- You were laid off as Chatelaine's editor in chief after less than a year as Editor in Chief - ouch! That's got to hurt.

I could dig deeper but why bother, it's only an article in The Walrus.

Oh come onJanuary 31, 2012 17:31 EST

@ Rob:

How do you write words without knowing how to read them? I.e., "Taking shots across the bow of people you have never spoken to (I note that there isn't a single interview or quote aside from what you pulled from their sites) isn't just sad — it's poor journalism."

Maryam Sanati & Casie Stewart: "When we meet, just after the Halloween weekend, she tells me she spent the day working at her friend’s vintage fashion store in downtown Toronto, in exchange for free clothes."

Maryam Sanati & Nolan Bryant: "When we meet for coffee, I find it remarkable that he is only nineteen; he is so self-confident and measured."

Maryam Sanati & Sarah Nicole Prickett: "'I'm a Millennial, right?' she asks me. 'I keep reading about how unhappy we supposedly are.' One such piece happens to appear on the cover of New York magazine the week she and I meet in a downtown Toronto restaurant called the Bohemian Gastropub."

I could dig deeper but why bother.

YYZJanuary 31, 2012 18:42 EST

Removed for violation of walrusmagazine.com’s comment policy: abusive language.

KateJanuary 31, 2012 21:05 EST

I don't think this is simply a Gen Y problem. I noticed a few of these examples stem from those who are interested and involved in the fashion industry. Have people in the fashion industry not always created an image for themselves? Social media and the web is just an extension of that physical image that was once created solely through clothing.

Sea MelonJanuary 31, 2012 23:36 EST

This list of indignant comments underscores Sanati's point. I guess the first casualty of affluence is humility.

DANFebruary 01, 2012 15:27 EST

Awesome cartoon of Casie! Well done Michael.

CLFebruary 01, 2012 15:27 EST

It's quite a surprise to find Madison-avenue style marketing hoo-ha in the pages of Walrus magazine. Generation X, Y, Z, or what not. Nothing more than overly-simplistic demographics from 20th century marketing models. Shame!

stephen straussFebruary 07, 2012 17:31 EST



Viewing the world from the point of view of a generation older than Maryam, I am struck with how deaf she is to something fundamental about what she is writing about. The reason why moderns opine/vent/bloat/egotrip so incessantly in 2012 is that they can. The internet has permitted a person to both say what he/she feels, and via blogs/twitter/YouTube create an audience for their depiction of self.
A decade or so ago, a lonely, unpublished person (a category that basically included everyone on the planet) might have reflected: I have opinions that matter; I have feelings that should be heard; my life has enough authenticity to be a public life. And after arriving at that apercu...nothing. The reason why is that the existing media’s unannounced purpose was to keep most people from telling most other people about what they thought about most things. Only the tiniest sliver of a sliver of a sliver of inner voices – think Leah McLaren and Rebecca Eckler and Russell Smith in this country– got to be heard. And part of the reason their columns (particularly Leah’s) elicited so much bile and hatred was that when a newspaper or magazine published them they at the same time didn’t publish someone or someone’s else. Old media’s space and time constraints didn’t allow for more than a very few voices to be heard – no matter what they had to say nor how well they said it.
Today we find ourselves in a timeless, spaceless, webby, bloggy world where the lonely mute people of the past can brand themselves. Can publish themselves. Can establish an audience for themselves. And so they do. In 2012 we are experiencing not so much freedom of the press as freedom from the press.
And so the essential question moderns face is really not what is one generation doing that another might have wanted to do but didn’t, but a reconfiguration of McLuhan’s “the medium is the message” trope. When a new media arises we don’t know at its birth what its true message is. And so we experiment with stuff to find out what really works. Today we don’t know if too many bad blogs will require so much time to sort through that their simple existence will diminish the value of the good blogs. Call it Gresham’s Law Applied to Self-Publishing. Or if a personal brand we establish for ourselves at 18 will become a hateful stereotype we can’t escape at 40. Or what will happen to our psychological well-being if we can’t personally live up to the public persona we have created
These questions among other things, among a whole universe of other things, remain to be answered and so we blog/twitter/YouTube and await for history to tell us what the web is really good for. If you want a classic example of sorting things out when a new media arises, take a look at the history of airplanes and in particular the rise and fall of that now bizarre application of flight known as barnstorming. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnstorming.
We are, it seems to me, today trying to sort out if a personal blog/brand is the 21st century’s version barnstorming, or if it is the inner voice's equivalent of the arrival of the airline industry.

really?February 08, 2012 09:40 EST

What annoys me most about this piece is the repeated use of "we" when the writer should really be saying "I". It reminds me of travelling abroad with a naive 18-year-old who kept embarrassing me by saying things like "oh, we don't do that in Canada". There are plenty of people in my cohort (I'm 33) and Maryam's who would have taken to the new technologies and behaviours with wild abandon – and the Boomers just as much so, I'm sure. We just didn't have the tools. Does that really make it a generation gap?

Ell TeeFebruary 22, 2012 14:19 EST

Put any of these people on a Greyhound, headed for Hollywood or New York with dreams of stardom and there's no difference. Previous to the Online Age, precious, young things going nova from the internal pressure of their own importance would be left to develop a sense of perspective.

Comment on this article
  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
March 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Laughs
Search the web, support the Walrus Foundation
COPA