Editor’s Note

Introducing the September 2009 issue of The Walrus
T he history of Canada is, for many Canadians, terra incognita. In far too many of the country’s high schools, the subject is now, like music and drama, an “option.” This would explain the Angus Reid survey in which 61 percent of Canadians between the ages of 18 and 24 were unable to distinguish between Sir John A. Macdonald and Sir Laurence Olivier. And yet even these poor souls — young people who probably could not recall the date of Confederation (1867), the name of the last province admitted (Newfoundland), or the year we repatriated the Constitution from Great Britain (1982)­—­even they might know a thing or two about the Battle of the Plains of Abraham.

What­ took ­place­ on ­September 13, 1759, on a plateau overlooking the St. Lawrence River, upstream from Quebec City, is an iconic moment in the country’s historical narrative: literally the beginning of the story of Canada. Britain and France were vying for North America; Wolfe attacked Montcalm; Wolfe prevailed, although both generals were mortally wounded; the British went on to capture Montreal; New France was dead. But there is so much more. I was never taught, for instance, that Montcalm, badly outnumbered, joined the battle without waiting for reinforcements. Or that Wolfe, who had already led the British to a great victory at Louisbourg, had numerous detractors, including the Duke of Newcastle, who told King George II that Wolfe was mad. The king is said to have responded, “Mad, is he? Then I hope he will bite some of my other generals.”

The battle’s rich narrative detail was not lost on Helen Humphreys as she set out to reimagine it on this its 250th anniversary (“On the Plains of Abraham,1759,” page22). Humphreys, who lives in Kingston, is the author of four books of poetry and five novels: Leaving Earth (1997), Afterimage (2000), The Lost Garden (2002),Wild Dogs (2004),and Coventry (2008). She is a brilliant writer — The New Yorker has called her work lyrical — and an obvious choice for this assignment. While she was born in England, where schoolchildren are more familiar with the Battle of Agincourt than the Battle of the Plains of Abraham, she came to Canada when she was three and has emerged as one of the country’s foremost creators of historical fiction.

When we think about novelists, we are inclined to think about feats of imagination. But as Humphreys’ meticulous reconstruction illustrates, fiction of quality is often the product of feats of research as well. “I found the task of writing about the Plains of Abraham a challenging one,” she admits. “Even though I write historical fiction, I am a fiction writer, not a historian, and so instead of commenting on the political echoes of the event, I chose to stay inside the battle itself, and to focus on the experiences of a few of the people who were there that day. To this end, I concentrated my research on accounts from the participants in the event.”

We asked Humphreys to write the story after learning that the National Battlefields Commission, a federal agency, had cancelled plans to mark the anniversary with a re-enactment. Quebec sovereignists had threatened to disrupt the event, calling it “federalist propaganda.” The commission’s capitulation illustrates what is wrong with the teaching of history in Canada — namely, that we would rather not teach it if there is a chance that doing so might cause offence. This, as the historian Jack Granatstein laments, diminishes us as a nation. You are entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts. The outcome of the battle on the Plains of Abraham 250 years ago is a matter of historical record. What is up for debate is its meaning.

2 comment(s)

AlxAugust 21, 2009 00:41 EST

I seem to recall Conrad Black once referring to Canada's political correctness as 'an embarrassment to the world.' Fortunately I don't think anyone was paying attention at the time, and even if they were I don't think they would have cared.

AnonymousSeptember 08, 2009 11:30 EST

There definitely shouild be a Celebration of this historical event.It's Canadian history whether the French like it or not.
Why does canada always capitulate to others rather than do what is right the first time.
This event should be written about and talked about on the week leading up to this historical event which shaped Canada into what it is today.

The FRENCH have attitude....all bad regarding this event.

Add a comment

  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
June 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Foundation National Event Guide

The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone

12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto

The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?

6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary

The Walrus Laughs
The Walrus SoapBox