Editor’s Note

Is it time to eliminate the middleman in public education?
Illustration by Mariah Burton

The Toronto District School Board is the largest entity of its kind in the country. It oversees 595 schools, 257,000 students, 16,000 elementary and secondary school teachers, and 25,000 additional full- and part-time staff. According to the organizational chart on its website, it also employs almost fifty senior managers. Its annual budget, about $2.5 billion, is bigger than those of all but two Canadian cities. Like school boards elsewhere in Canada, it is governed by part-time elected trustees, many of them aspiring politicians. At the TDSB, there are twenty-two, each of whom is paid an honorarium of $26,000 a year. In total, this layer of educational infrastructure — the interface between Ontario’s Department of Education and those 595 schools — costs around $75 million a year.

The Canadian Constitution gives the provinces jurisdiction over education. Over the years, and with variations from province to province, a system has evolved in which centralized functions are performed by provincial departments of education while decentralized functions are delegated to school boards. What this means in practice is that the departments of education establish curriculum, set standards for student achievement, and approve learning materials. The school boards do everything else, which in the case of the TDSB means allocating resources; hiring and firing principals, teachers, and other staff; monitoring student achievement; and building and maintaining facilities. The TDSB would add that it also “sets priorities to reflect community values and goals,” and collaborates with other levels of government “in the best interest of constituents and public policy.”

In a wave of amalgamations that began in the early ’90s, many provinces reduced the number of school districts, to give students more choice in school selection and greater access to special programs; to give teachers more mobility; and to rationalize resources, eliminate duplication and, it was hoped, lower the cost of governance. The result was fewer but larger school boards, of which the TDSB is merely the most outsized. In Alberta, where there were once 181 school boards, there are now sixty-four — some of them behemoths like the TDSB. The Edmonton board runs more than 200 schools with 80,000 students and 7,000 employees. Its budget is almost $850 million a year.

School boards are unique to Canada and the United States, although a number of American cities — notably Boston, Chicago, and New York — have recently eliminated them. In New York, the board of education became the department of education, its employees answerable to mayor Michael Bloomberg, who campaigned on education reform. The model has advocates here, although New Brunswick is the only Canadian jurisdiction in which it has been adopted; in 1996, the province replaced its school boards with administrative units run as divisions under the Department of Education. New Zealand showed the way: in the late ’80s, it shut down its school boards as an exercise in cost reduction, replacing them with school councils consisting of parents, teachers, and, in some cases, representatives from business and industry. Apparently, no harm was done; in 2008, the United Nations’ Human Development Index ranked the country’s education system among the best in the world.

We can all agree that public education constitutes one of the building blocks of our society — and that it will be even more important going forward, as we try to find our way in the so-called knowledge economy. So it is reasonable to ask whether the arrangements we made to manage public education more than a century ago are still working. To begin: are school boards really accountable? You are part of a tiny minority of Canadians if you can even name your trustee, never mind offer an assessment of his or her performance. Another question: absent accountability, have the country’s school boards ceded too much power to self-interested teachers’ unions? And a third: have we, without meaning to, created educational infrastructures so massive and complex that the public no longer understands how they work, let alone how to play a role in changing what they do? And finally, if it is possible to run hospitals with boards of part-time, unpaid volunteers, which we do, could we not run schools the same way? In short: is it time to eliminate the middleman in public education?

These are questions we should ask ourselves as the country’s five million elementary and secondary students return to school this fall — for their sake, and for ours.
John Macfarlance is editor and co-publisher of The Walrus.
Mariah Burton has illustrated two children’s books, including Somewhere Where Nobody Knows (2010).

3 comment(s)

heidibAugust 12, 2010 14:35 EST

New Zealand style management with a blend of parents, teachers and business people sounds interesting. I\'d like to know more details about how well it\'s working in New Brunswick.

AugustAugust 19, 2010 15:32 EST

I'm not entirely sure what you're arguing here. New Zealand and New Brunswick are both smaller than, say, Ontario, by an order of magnitude at the very least. After the amalgamations, you could probably find school boards in rural areas that cover more square kilometers than either jurisdiction, with dramatically fewer resources (fewer resources per student, but most likely greater costs per student, as bringing in materials costs more, travel expenses are higher thanks to the complete absence of public transit infrastructure and the greater distances involved, and the expenses of other kinds of access—like digital communications—also dramatically higher). In areas of high population density, volunteer-run institutions can lean on each other for expertise and informal assistance, or even make formal alliances of convenience. In areas of low population density (like most of the province, geographically speaking, where access to materials, services, and funding are all greatly reduces, while the cost of many of those things—travel and transport of goods in particular, given that there is essentially no public transit infrastructure outside of a handful of Ontario cities and gasoline can cost as much as 50% more—is much higher), that's not possible. The magic phrases "greater autonomy", "greater accountability" and "greater fiscal responsibility" largely translate into cutting adrift anyone who lives outside an urban centre or one of its bedroom communities. I know that's de rigeur in Ontario policy-making, but it's got to stop.

This sounds like most policy suggestions that come out of urban Ontario: great for the urban middle class, lousy for the rural constituents. There's a reason Ontario has a separate economic action plan for the rural north: almost none of its southern citizens and policy makers include that region when they say "Ontario," and it's almost always easier to make policy that works for the south and then try to shoe-horn the rural north into it. Harris' reforms were substantially harder on the rural north, and I don't see how this would be any different.

AnonymousSeptember 08, 2010 14:07 EST

School trustees are essential since they should be accountable for ensuring that quality education is available to all students within their respective school board boundaries. They are the front line representatives of the taxpaying public to ensure that the government provides the necessary resources to provide educational opportunities for students within their jurisdiction. The problem is that successive Ontario governments' have weakened the role of elected school trustees. For example: taking away the power to raise local taxes; imposed a flawed funding formula; imposed central table negotiation procedures for all school board employees, etc. The reality: The Ontario Government and Ministry of Education virtually run the day by day operations of Ontario's school boards. The government determines the funding, curriculum and all other aspects of the daily operation of schools, thereby undermining the role of trustees. Local school trustees are basically left as the " fall guys" for the Ontario Government and Ministry of Education. When parents have concerns about their child's education or about cuts in educational resources; trustees take the rap. This is a very convenient arrangement for the government.

What is required is that the role of trustee should be enhanced. Many of their lost powers should be restored. A review of the number of school boards should be undertaken to determine what the optimum size of school boards should be. There is no question that too many of the existing Ontario school boards are too large and cover too large a geographic area to be truly effective in providing quality education. Perhaps it's time to address the issue of establishing a single, non-sectarian, public school system consisting of English and French language school boards. By doing so, trustees would be elected by eligible citizens to represent the educational interests of all, not just those of one particular group of citizens.

Add a comment

  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
June 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Foundation National Event Guide

The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone

12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto

The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?

6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary

The Walrus Laughs
The Walrus SoapBox