Mister Right

How has Nigel Wright, Stephen Harper’s new chief of staff, reached the top of the business and political worlds without making enemies?
Illustration by Marie Lessard
Rosedale Valley Road is a tree-lined sanctuary that winds through the ravined heart of Toronto. For Nigel Wright, it’s part of a half-marathon route he used to traverse virtually every day, but one morning nine years ago its calm was abruptly shattered. Just after five a.m., a German shepherd came charging at him out of the trees. Within moments, three other equally ferocious dogs were also upon him. There was no traffic, nor any apparent avenue of escape. “They started working as a pack,” Wright said in a news account of the incident, “coming around me from all directions. I was extremely aggressive. It was absolute survival and an animalistic response. I really thought that this was it. I absolutely thought I was going to die.” Suddenly and serendipitously, a cab appeared and Wright, who had been kicking frantically at the dogs, managed to flag it down just as their owner emerged from the underbrush and called them off.

A “wrong place at the wrong time” kind of event, but the next morning Wright was probably back on the roads. Obsessive about fitness and long inured to the loneliness, the dark, and the vagaries of weather, he runs at a brisk pace — usually twenty kilometres in about 100 minutes. He runs early because that’s when he has time. By seven in the morning, he is at his desk for the start of a second half-marathon, a fourteen-hour day punctuated with work by other names: evening staff meetings, social receptions, and a few armloads of professional reading.

He has been running like this — an average of 120 kilometres a week — for twenty-five years. Until he arrived in Ottawa last fall, he had trained mainly in the neighbourhoods around his downtown Toronto home, although he also runs while travelling on business: the United States, Europe, Africa, Asia, across dozens of alien landscapes. Here’s the basic math: twenty-five years at 120 kilometres per week makes more than 155,000 kilometres. It would be a mistake to regard this statistic as trivial, or to view his running as merely a casual discipline; it’s more than that — a ritual as sacred in some respects as a religious practice.

Indeed, if he were to talk about running, he would doubtless describe its benefits as being as much spiritual as physical — the quest for a Zenlike state in which a stress imposed on the body confers relief of the spirit. At least publicly, however, he isn’t talking about running — nor anything else. In the spring of 2010, Prime Minister Stephen Harper, an old friend, invited Wright to take an eighteen- to twenty-four-month leave from one of the top jobs on Bay Street to become his chief of staff in Ottawa.

It was an invitation that implied no small amount of sacrifice. Wright was a managing director at Onex Corporation, the private equity Goliath and — after the federal government — the country’s largest single employer. Although Onex does not publish details of executive compensation, it is widely believed that his gross annual income in salary and bonuses exceeds $2 million; on Parliament Hill, it’s unlikely that he will earn more than $300,000. Still, Harper’s summons was a call to public service he felt he could not refuse. We live in an age grown properly skeptical of such conceits — noblesse oblige lite — but Wright’s, it happens, is genuine. In many ways, he’s a throwback to another era. He developed an appetite for politics in high school: at seventeen, he wrote a well-reasoned letter to the editor about the flaws in Pierre Trudeau’s constitutional patriation proposal, and it was published in the Globe and Mail. Even then, his preference was more for the meat of public policy than for the seamier side dish of campaign tactics, and it has never really left him.

Nor was his interest simply academic; he sought engagement. In university, he threw himself into the Young Conservatives, backing Brian Mulroney’s leadership campaign in 1983. Greg Lyle, another young Tory at the time, recalls that he found meeting Wright “pretty intimidating. It was incredible how smart he was. He really knew his stuff.” Tom Long, who as president of Ontario’s campus Conservatives led 300 delegates at the convention, recalls that “our bloc ended up being the difference between Brian and John Crosbie on the penultimate ballot. Nigel was a key part of that.” Writer and commentator David Frum, who also met Wright during those years, says, “Nigel was the Conservative’s conservative, but in a very subtle and nuanced way. He saw beyond the Reaganite, Thatcherite slogans of the day. He saw how the Canadian experience was similar and how it was different.”

Still, Wright’s economic instincts — freer trade, lower taxes, less intrusive government — were always identified with the party’s bluer, more libertarian wing.

In Ontario, he led a small cadre of policy planners who worked on Mike Harris’s unsuccessful 1990 campaign, and later played a formative role in the birth of the Reform/Alliance movement. When Tom Long launched his bid for the leadership of the Canadian Alliance Party, he says, “I immediately called Nigel, and he helped me paint a comprehensive picture of how the world works, how domestic policy works; here’s the policy matrix you need to be thinking about. It was like going to school and getting a crash course.” After Long lost to Stockwell Day, he turned once again to Wright, to help raise money to eliminate Long’s campaign debts. (The two have remained close friends; Wright is godfather to Long’s son, Michael.)

Later, Wright was among those who encouraged Stephen Harper to seek the leadership of the newly united federal party. Since that merger in 2003, Wright has continued to play an active — albeit backstage — role, as a productive fundraiser and a valued policy adviser to Harper and other senior Conservative politicians. Even before tapping him to join his staff, Harper was in touch with him on policy questions. Wright used to sit on the board of the Manning Centre for Building Democracy, run by former Reform Party leader Preston Manning, an affiliation that gave him a foothold in the two principal factions of the broader party: the more ideologically driven Western element, of which the Manning Centre is at the forefront, and the more pragmatic Eastern group that has effectively seized the levers of party power.

He began work in the Prime Minister’s Office last November, in tandem with outgoing chief of staff Guy Giorno, and became the sole, official gatekeeper on January 1. But the low profile remains; these days, if he consents to any interviews, it will be to trumpet what he perceives as the virtues of Stephen Harper’s Conservative government, not to talk about himself. (He declined to be interviewed for this article.) But he continues to run most mornings, and if you rise early enough you may spot him sprinting through the spectral, frozen wastes of the capital. Look closely. As he helps steer the unstable vessel of Harperism toward the next federal election, one eye, at least metaphorically, is cocked for signs of trouble — mindful of both the government’s many political enemies, and those dogs on Rosedale Valley Road that would happily have eaten him for breakfast.

Although he has spent the past thirteen years at Onex, and about seven before that practising merger and acquisitions and securities law at Davies, Ward, and Beck, one of the country’s most prestigious commercial firms, Nigel Wright’s recent government secondment is not his first direct encounter with Ottawa’s favourite blood sport. In 1984, and barely into his twenties, he took a phone call from Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. Would he consider taking a hiatus from law school at the University of Toronto to work as a speechwriter and serve as assistant to Charley McMillan, the PM’s senior policy adviser? Wright consulted the school’s dean, Robert Prichard, who urged him to take the job, notwithstanding the inevitable delay and complication of his legal training. But the chat with Prichard was mostly about observing protocol; Wright had already made the decision. As he told his Trinity College friend Kevin Adolphe, “I feel a duty to the country.” From any other bright young college student, this might have sounded pretentious or simply inane; from Wright, it was totally sincere.

In Ottawa, he roomed in a downtown apartment with Tom Long, who was working elsewhere in the PMO. “We lived together, but I rarely saw him,” recalls Long. “Nigel worked incredibly hard, late into the evening, and then he’d be up at some ungodly hour working some more.”

One night, Wright and McMillan were staying late in the Langevin Block, across from Parliament Hill, preparing the prime minister’s notes for the next day’s cabinet meeting. It was 8:30 p.m., half an hour before their deadline, when the hotline on McMillan’s desk lit up: it was an aide from Mulroney’s office, asking if the material was ready.

“Almost done,” Wright assured him. Two minutes later, the phone lit up again. Wright impatiently grabbed the receiver and, only half in jest, barked, “Will you fuck off!” Only this time, it wasn’t an aide at the other end; it was Mulroney himself. Unfazed, the PM slipped into his signature basso profundo and crooned, “Could you please put Charley on the line?” And for what was possibly the first and last time in his life, Nigel Wright was left, momentarily at least, cringing with embarrassment.

An old and amusing story, of course, but one that, in the peculiar way the world sometimes turns, acquired a contemporary relevance when Wright, now forty-seven, returned to the Langevin Block last fall.

Home · Page 1 of 3 · Next

15 comment(s)

hollinmMarch 14, 2011 21:21 EST

Excellent article. Let\\\'s hope Nigel can bring some discipline to Harper and his cronies who insist on shooting themselves in the foot. After five years in government Harper should be wiping the floor with the likes of Dion and Ignatieff. Something is wrong and hopefully Wright can find the solution before its too late.

Fine TuneMarch 15, 2011 01:52 EST

A very well-written article and it likely reflects the very genuine motivation of Nigel Wright to serve the public without the need for attention that elected politicians may have in their DNA. Elected politicians (and their families) make incredible sacrifices for the public and are frequently belittled by the media and others. Therefore its gratifying that some private citizens, like Nigel Wright, make personal & financial sacrfices to assist those politicians in the work they do for all of us. Hopefully, CoS Nigel's more mature and thoughtful disposition will help ensure that one side of the PMO is not busy shooting the government in the foot while the other side of the office is intent on making "own goals".

DSMarch 15, 2011 11:29 EST

Great article. I believe Nigel dated Suzaane Amos during his first stint in the PMO office. The ironical thing is that Suzanne happens to be married to Warren Kinsella.

PurpleKushYMarch 18, 2011 09:47 EST

Brilliant read. I loved this whole issue and will be subscribing from here on in...

Marc PMarch 21, 2011 10:18 EST

An extremely good article at presenting a CV on Mr Wright to people who have never heard of the man. It's refreshing to hear about a Canadian willing to serve for the good of the country, rather than the good of himself. Kudos to Mr Wright. I can only hope that a man with his impressive and admirable skill set will help set the country's politics back on track.

AnonymousMarch 21, 2011 22:42 EST

This article seems laughably biased. I picked up this magazine on a recent trip to Canada from Washington, DC. The writer seems to have some kind of infatuation with Mr. Wright and this piece only serves as a poster board of his admiration for the man. Why would the editors allow such blatant subjectivity into this report? \"Indeed, because he has already accumulated significant wealth...no one can logically argue that he is using the chief of staff job as a springboard to financial gain.\"

That analysis is absolutely unshakable! After all, we all know that when you\'re rich and you reach a couple million, you\'re perfectly content there. Just ask anyone on Wall Street. And it\'s laughable that Mr. Wright would need to face an ethics committee on the most obvious conflicts of interest. After all, this CEO friend says he has a lion\'s heart and would never dream of doing anything for his own gain as a public servant.

What a stupid writer and the editors for letting this go through.

Isabelle Mouat KeithMarch 23, 2011 23:19 EST

I agree with the comments made by the Mar. 21st. author. After reading the article, I am amused to see that \"The Walrus\" remains in the Public Relations business. Mr. Wright should know better, and I hope he does not sink the \"Harper\" ship. I have great confidence in Stephen Harper and I hope that the Conservatives can move past this.

Geoffrey RowanMarch 26, 2011 16:28 EST

As a card-carrying Liberal, my great concern was that by bringing in Nigel Wright as Chief of Staff, the Harper Administration gave itself a strength and credibility that it was sorely lacking. I worked with Nigel only briefly, for a matter of weeks, on a single project but he made a lasting impression. I have interviewed many hundreds of business and political leaders in a 20 year journalism career, and worked with many others in a 13 year PR career. Nigel has no enemies because he is as Michael Posner describes him — an intensely intelligent man of great integrity and no pretense who cares about public service and backs up his beliefs with thoughtful action. I wish he was a Liberal, and the fact that he is not gives me pause to reconsider my own affiliation. If a guy like Nigel can be a Conservative ... hmmm. Nah. I don't know that there are many people of Nigel's caliber in the world, but when one of them volunteers for public service we should consider ourselves fortunate, even if we have to do so grudgingly.

T SawApril 03, 2011 12:53 EST

I believe the conflict of interest is in using public policy to further the interests of the industry where his wealth is invested.

For example a quick google produced this information on Onex - see below. While I am not saying there is a connection with the current military jet purchases, it is hard not to look at these things and wonder.

He may have a brilliant mind and certainly our country needs leaders such as these (or advisors to leaders) but how can we separate these issues. I am in a quandry over this as I truly would like to see Canadas best influencing our Federal policy.

TORONTO and NEW YORK – Onex Corporation (TSX: OCX) announced today that it and GS Capital Partners, an affiliate of Goldman Sachs, have
completed the $3.8 billion (US$3.3 billion) acquisition of Raytheon Aircraft Company, the general aviation, special-mission and trainer aircraft
business of Raytheon Company (NYSE: RTN).
The business, headquartered in Wichita, Kansas and now operating as Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, is a leading manufacturer of business jet,
turboprop and piston aircraft through its Hawker and Beechcraft brands. Its products include the Hawker 850XP, the best selling business jet family
in the history of the general aviation industry, as well as the industry’s best selling turboprop line with the King Air family. The company is also a
significant manufacturer of military training aircraft to the U.S. Air Force and Navy and to foreign governments.

JDSofToApril 06, 2011 13:01 EST

One would have to live a very long time to have the leisure to point out in detail what a fawning piece of garbage this article is.

Mr.Wright has left Omex to work very hard in helping Stephen Harper win a majority government. Mr.Harper's government is determined to push through an untendered contract for the F-35 at a cost which is very likely to balloon well beyond the $16 billion dollar price-tag stated in this piece. Canadian tax-payers have been unable to pin the government down on how much these jets are going to cost; and, indeed, Mr.Harper and his cohorts had gone to great lengths to "massage" the few details they have put before the public.

Mr.Wright could, of course, earn some of the hefty praise Michael Posner confers on him in this article by telling Canadians just how much we are likely to donate to his friends at Hawker Beechcraft Inc. and Lockheed Martin in the purchase of these stealth air craft; but that's not going to happen. I guess we have that "ethical wall" to thank for that. The very fact that Mr.Wright worked at Omex for thirteen years, coupled with the fact that he's going back there after his very brief stint (two years max) in public service means that Lockheed Martin is sitting "just outside the door" on every matter that passes through the Tory cabinet. Mr.Posner should Google "the revolving door" between elite business interests and the State. And though Mr.Wright is purportedly "taking a hit" in lost income while "slumming it" as Harper's chief of staff, one wonders just how big Mr.Wright's personal losses will be if the untendered contract for the F-35 goes south. (Yeah, I can hear all you Bay Streeters chuckling, "Not going to happen.")

A Conservative's idea of "libertarian" when it comes to Government stops at "free money" for the backroom boys.

As per this piece Mr. Wright's a long distance, a workaholic, a loner who has rubbed shoulders with the likes of Brian Mulroney, Mike Harris and Preston Manning- three political leaders Canadian voters have trusted, have been burned by, and have kicked to the curbside next to the recycling bin. He's on a serious losing-streak in my books, and though apparently bright, he doesn't seem to learn from his mistakes.

There are a lot of people who would love to tell both Brian Mulroney and Stephen Harper to "F- Off" and I bet they wouldn't feel all that embarrassed afterwords.

Canadians who also put in very long days for significantly less remuneration could do with a lot less "help" from the likes of Nigel Wright.

Note to the Editor: I'm two issues into a renewed subscription (after a hiatus longer than Mr.Wright's proposed tenure as Chief of Staff) and already I'm deeply regretting my decision to support this magazine and writing that amounts to little more than (to misquote its author) "A [contrived] soundbite... but otherwise nonsense.

BlakeApril 25, 2011 15:18 EST

I think the story about the dogs chasing Mr Nigel Wright down the street provides more truth than this inflated piece of op-ed. What exactly is Nigel running from? And why would dogs be chasing him? Could it be that he is running from common sense as so many ambitious right-wingers do? Could it be that the dogs can smell fear, because for a man to run as much as this article claims he does, he must be running from something frightening.

Mr. Wright sounds like a true blood neoconservative, purely cynical and self-serving. He makes millions in the financial sector, spends a few years doing deals in parliament, setting up himself and friends to make billions, then heads back to the private world and scoops up the money, flipping the finger to the public.

Mr. Wright is just another cog in the Proto-Fascist movement happening in Canada. The Reform Party has morphed into the Con Party and now we have neo-nazis, religious fanatics, populists and cynical right-wingers wrestling for power in Ottawa.

This piece of propaganda ends my subscription to this magazine. I don't want to help fund right-wing populism.

DavidApril 26, 2011 10:23 EST

It is telling how easily upset some individuals can get when a positive article gets written about someone who happens to have a different political perspective than they do.

BobZirunkelMay 02, 2011 11:01 EST

The most inspiring hagiography I have read.
I'm going to replace my poster of John Paul II with one of Saint Nigel.
I wonder if there's time to get him to sign it before the election results come in?

Duff ConacherMay 10, 2011 16:20 EST

Michael Posner either doesn't know, or ignores, the many loopholes in the so-called "ethical wall" that Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson has supposedly constructed around Nigel Wright in his position as Prime Minister Harper's Chief of Staff. The wall is actually an open door. (NOTE: these comments have nothing to do with Mr. Wright as a person, or the Onex Group as a business — they are solely about the complete ineffectiveness of the federal government's ethics enforcement system).

Mr. Posner writes admiringly that the ethical wall will ensure Mr. Wright will not take part in "any direct dealings between Onex and the government. He had also agreed to exempt himself from all discussions involving the Canadian aerospace industry, since he had sat on the boards of Hawker Beechcraft Inc. and Spirit AeroSystems Inc., both Onex subsidiaries; as well as from investment industry taxation issues, and the deductibility of interest costs in cross-border investments. A complex mechanism has been constructed to prevent information about these files from crossing his desk. And for the duration of his tenure in the PMO, his public equity holdings, including 93,957 shares in Onex and 44,024 shares of its Cineplex Galaxy Income Fund — worth roughly $3.5 million — have been placed in a blind trust."

First, Mr. Wright did not commit, as Mr. Posner claims, in his compliance agreement with Ethics Commissioner Dawson to "exempt himself from all discussions involving the Canadian aerospace
industry." The agreement does not mention the aerospace industry, and it can be seen by clicking on the "Agreed Compliance Measures" link at:
http://ciec-ccie.gc.ca/ViewClient.aspx?ClientId=5963

Second, as Mr. Posner writes, Mr. Wright has only committed to not taking part in "direct dealings" between the government and Onex or, as the above agreement puts it, to " abstain from any participation in any matters or issues, other than those of general application, relating to the Onex Group."

This sounds good until you realize that 99.9% of Cabinet and Cabinet staff decisions are of general application because 99.9% of federal laws, regulations, policies, taxes, subsidies etc. apply generally to broad groups of people or businesses.

In fact, because of a loophole in the federal Conflict of Interest Act, every Cabinet minister, Cabinet staff, appointee and senior government official is allowed to take part in any decision as long as it applies generally.

Essentially, the only time the Act applies is if these people are making a specific decision about a specific company in which they, or their family members or friends, own shares or have some other financial interest. The only time this happens is when they make a decision about a contract (which Cabinet ministers and staff are not allowed to participate in), merger, takeover or license (such as an appeal from a CRTC decision) for such a company — which adds up to about 0.1% of their decisions.

So given the many Onex companies in various industries, Mr. Wright will be taking part in many, many Cabinet discussions and decisions that could benefit Onex and/or Mr. Wright financially or otherwise.

Third, a blind trust does not shield anyone from a conflict of interest, because they know what is in the trust and can easily tell their trustee when it is set up not to sell any of the assets in the trust.

Fourth, the ethics screen is being administered by the Deputy Chief of Staff, who serves under Mr. Wright and Prime Minister Harper, both of whom want Mr. Wright in his position. Essentially, this puts the Deputy Chief of Staff in a conflict of interest because s/he has a huge incentive to cover up any problems in order to please his/her bosses and keep his/her job.

So Mr. Wright's so-called "ethical wall" may be legal, but that doesn't make it ethical, and it is so full of loopholes and lacking in independent enforcement that it is actually an open door.

Mr. Posner believes Mr. Wright is so wealthy that he would not exploit these loopholes to push for decisions that will benefit Onex or himself. In taking this position, Mr. Posner ignores the fact that to have an effective ethics enforcement system people who have a conflict of interest must be prohibited from participating in decision-making processes because it is always impossible to know what is in a person's mind and what interests they have in pushing for any particular decision.

Before 2007, federal ethics rules prohibited Cabinet ministers and other senior government officials from being in an apparent conflict of interest in any way, not just financial, without any loopholes for decisions that apply generally (although the rules were never enforced). The U.S. federal rules are similarly strong in some situations. See details at:
http://dwatch.ca/camp/RelsDec0310.html

To ensure government officials make decisions in the public interest, the prohibition on apparent conflicts of any type of interest in any type of decision-making process must be put back into federal ethics rules — to see details, go to:
http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/OpEdNov0510.html

Hope this helps,
Duff Conacher, Coordinator
Democracy Watch
http://www.goodgovernment.ca

BobNovember 14, 2011 22:48 EST

As a high school classmate of Mr. Wright's it was obvious even then that Mr. Wright was destined to go places. Nigel's interest in and passion for politics set him apart in ways that few of us could fully appreciate. How gratifying to see someone with such integrity, intelligence and business acumen working in the PMO. I expect great things from this majority government and with Mr. Wright at the forefront we likely won't be disappointment. Congratulations to our Prime Minister, Mr. Harper, for recognizing and attracting such talent to his team.

Add a comment

  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
June 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Foundation National Event Guide

The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone

12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto

The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?

6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary

The Walrus Laughs
The Walrus SoapBox