The Pain Principle

Cyclist Ryder Hesjedal is one of the best athletes in Canada. Can he suffer enough to become the best in the world?
Photograph by Gaël Turine
It’s an overcast spring day in the middle of Basque Country, Spain, and a thirty-year-old British Columbian named Ryder Hesjedal is near the head of a convoy. Behind him: forty European station wagons, three ambulances, two helicopters, eight cop cars, twelve sedans, nine motorcycles, and 125 bicycles. Of particular concern to my companion in one of the station wagons — a Belgian former cycling champion named Eric Van Lancker, once bigger in his home country than weissebier — is the fact that there are twenty-six bicycles, nineteen sweep motorcycles, and a pace car ahead of Ryder Hesjedal.

On the station wagon’s dash, Van Lancker has tacked two sheets of paper. They differ in content, but are linked thematically. The first is the list of the day’s teams and riders, a compendium of professional cycling’s elite: Leipheimer, Horner, Vinokourov, Klöden, Sánchez, and the Schleck brothers, Andy and Fränk. The second is an expressionist representation of human trauma, which is in fact a herky-jerky profile of the day’s 150-kilometre course. The biggest topographical spike, rising at a 25 percent gradient, is the one Ryder Hesjedal happens to be negotiating right now.

Hesjedal is on the verge of becoming one of cycling’s Brahmins. In 2009, he won a stage of a Grand Tour, the Vuelta a España, something no Canadian has managed for more than twenty years. In 2010, he came second in the Amstel Gold one-day classic, and finished an unexpected (and astonishing) seventh in the Tour de France. Much is expected of him here in Basque Country, or Euskadi, as the local terrorist group calls it.

He is now at the climax of the first stage of the six-day 2011 Vuelta al País Vasco. It is a major event, and a prelude to July’s big show in France. Van Lancker, piloting the station wagon with one hand, watches the race broadcast on a GPS unit mounted on the dash. Hesjedal decides to make a statement: Twenty-fifth place. Then, magically, tenth. Then eighth. Then fifth. He slithers like a tasered garter snake through the knot of cyclists at the top of the hill, hurls himself over the lip, flings his handlebars forward. It’s a minor act of heroism that nevertheless leaves Van Lancker baffled: “Yes,” he says, “but why not start the hill fifth?”

Moments later, we pull up to the mess of the finish line, in the medieval town of Zumárraga. Somewhere amid a gaggle of cyclists, I catch sight of Hesjedal. He lifts his leg over his bike, hands the machine over to an assistant — and shrugs.

The gesture startles me, because I’ve seen it before. I’m almost physically yanked into a Grand Guignol memory from my childhood, in which I walk into my parents’ sun-dappled bedroom, brought there by screaming. My father lies on a bloody sheet, so badly ripped up that bone glistens white through his skin. Leaning over him, my mother vainly tries to patch the wounds with gauze. Earlier, during a bike race, he had reached for a water bottle. He had misjudged the move, lost control at speed, and slid along the tarmac, tearing up his left flank. For one brilliant moment, he stops wailing, looks over at me, and hitches his shoulders in a ridiculous, inscrutable shrug.

A circle closes. Everything about cycling is contained in that gesture, including its reigning truism: to race bicycles is to drink greedily from a bottomless chalice of agony. The sport and its heroes are only knowable, and then just barely, once you come to understand that suffering is cycling’s currency. And what that currency buys is the occasional — the very, very occasional — moment of exquisite glory. Mostly, it purchases tough breaks and tougher questions. Much like the one Eric Van Lancker asks of the rider before him. And by “Why not start the hill fifth?” he is really asking, “Is Ryder Hesjedal willing to suffer completely?”

A man from British Columbia finishes top ten in the Tour de France, he should automatically be in the running for Canadian athlete of the year and all the other “best of” accolades handed out to bobsledders and ice dancers and Sidney Crosby. Currently, maddeningly, Ryder Hesjedal is not a star. Cycling, when it isn’t about doping, is SportsCentre filler, something to show right before the Frisbee-catching seal, or the lawn bowling carp. Canada has had bicycling royalty before (Steve Bauer, who finished fourth in the 1988 Tour de France), and we have a stable of excellent riders now: Svein Tuft, Michael Barry, and Andrew Randell. And yet Canucks Zamboni drivers enjoy greater name recognition.

I first properly meet Hesjedal on the day after his hill-climbing caper, at the start of stage two in Zumárraga. He is leaving a camper belonging to Garmin-Cervélo, the American race team managed by former Lance Armstrong teammate and anti-doping crusader Jonathan Vaughters. Ordinarily, Garmin would be travelling with a decal-covered tour bus, the likes of which the nineteen other teams have parked pell-mell across Zumárraga’s tight centrum. The bus, however, is in the shop, and the camper gives Garmin an aw-shucks, underdog mien — misleading, considering the team’s status as one of cycling’s most successful outfits.

If you didn’t know that Ryder Hesjedal’s name was Ryder Hesjedal, you’d call him something similarly Nordic, like Sven Järgvesson or Bjorn Flüghorn. It’s easy to imagine him with braids, wearing elk fur. If you didn’t know he was from British Columbia, you’d probably assume he was from the West Coast. Even in cycling cleats, he lopes, surfer-style. In his racing kit, he is lean and tall and comes to a point at his extremities, like Jack Kirby’s early illustrations of Mr. Fantastic. His torso is absurdly long, and a lifetime spent on bicycles has warped his body to the point that he is no longer capable of standing upright. In profile, his body forms a subtle, curving S, while his shoulders look wide and mock strong. (Cyclists, like velociraptors, are unburdened by upper body strength.)

I ask how he’s doing. “I’m feeling good,” he says. “The sun is shining in Basque Country.” He swirls a dark liquid around in a small plastic cup: “Just a little caffeine. And then a bike race.”

The first thing you notice about professional cyclists is that, with few exceptions, they appear to live their internal lives in a heavily padlocked tomb of mental anguish. They are at once astonishingly young and improbably ancient, a result of the fact that they are paid for their agony. They are modern-day ascetics, working in the open-air monastery of the mountains of Europe, with helmets as tonsures, spandex as robes.

There is thus a detachment in their manner that suggests the real world — our world — exists to them only as storybook legend, trapped as they are in another realm, with no corollaries, no points of contact, no common ground. They experience their lives through the tiny aperture of cycling; the aperture is so small because the light is so fierce. They have felt and done things on the farthest shore of the possible.

Professional cycling is the toughest sport legally practised in the developed world — and by a long shot. It’s tempting to bevel that statement by acknowledging the very real hardships of the NHL, the NFL, or the UFC, but that just seems pointless, especially after observing a routine Grand Tour crash, in which an athlete wearing little more than a leotard hits asphalt at sixty kilometres an hour, leaving a slick of epidermis in his wake. (As I write this, the cycling world is mourning the young Belgian Wouter Weylandt, who died in a crash on May 9 during the third stage of the 2011 Giro d’Italia.) Concussions, paralysis, lower back pain, saddle sores, mouth dryness, chafing — all of the above. And while this puts cycling at least on par with contact sports in terms of violent physical duress, it is resolutely not what makes cycling exponentially more difficult.

No other sport demands the same time, pain, and work ethic. You cannot race a Grand Tour without being in supreme physical shape, so fit that you are actually eating yourself, and must consume the same amount of food and liquid as nearly three grown men — which amounts to about 6,000 calories a day — to stay alive. During a warm weather race, a cyclist will lose three kilograms, and must chug five litres of restorative liquid, or it’s game over. (Try that twenty-one days in a row.) Cycling doesn’t have a bench. It doesn’t have time outs. The boys don’t celebrate a good day’s racing at a Hennessy-sponsored nightclub.

Home · Page 1 of 4 · Next

21 comment(s)

Jane Victoria KingJune 15, 2011 02:11 EST

Not only a man from British Columbia... our local boy from Vancouver Island.
The Cycling Capital of Canada knows how to breed them... just sayin'.

Major NelsonJune 15, 2011 14:59 EST

I think you captured the essence of cycling in this article. Thankfully, you caught it from a person that exemplifies what sacrifices, pain, suffering and what becomes of pure talent. Though often depicted as a drug-addled society of rich kids, playing with sponsor’s money and fan's hopes and dreams, the reality is Ryder's life as explained here. It is a lonely, hard road, filled with many who agonize to cross a line where sometimes the crowd cheers. It is also hotel rooms that smell like 'baby poop' and talcum. I've sent this article to many of my fellow amateur riders, most of whom argue over the exploits of Lance Armstrong, nut have forgotten the army behind him who made him what he is (or portrayed to be) today. An army of spleen-punctured artists, journeymen, and misfortuned work-a-holics, strewn through the mountains of Europe, waiting for vultures to type in the latest results of the last race. Thanks for reminding us that there is more to cycling than yellow jerseys.

bierJune 15, 2011 16:42 EST

"a Belgian former cycling champion named Eric Van Lancker, once bigger in his home country than weissebier"

Apparently the author has Belgium - where they drink witbier/blanche -confused with Bavaria, where they drink weissebier.

Boy from BostonJune 15, 2011 18:42 EST

Great article. Found the link on VN.

As you noted, Ryder spent his earlier career as a mountainbike racer. I was a little surprised that there was no mention of his training partner Roland Green.

KevinJune 15, 2011 20:54 EST

You've written about road cycling in a way that not many have been able to, and I've read a lot. Please write a book or two on the sport, I could read this for years.

You only know how hard it is when you're willing your bike and body forward with every iota in your being, only to see the wheel ahead of your slipping away. Millimeters become centimeters, then meters, then minutes. It's a gorgeous sport.

gazmatazJune 16, 2011 01:36 EST

Good article but the whole thing was ruined by one sentence. I object vehemently to your description of the basque autonomous region: "Much is expected of him here in Basque Country, or Euskadi, as the local terrorist group calls it."

The implication that everyone who speaks the Basque language is a terrorist is incredibly offensive. The history of the Basque language, Basque people and Basque politics is very complicated and shouldn't be dismissed in one throw away remark that dismisses a whole people as terrorists. Please retract this statement and issue an apology to both your readers and to the Basque people who you have unfairly maligned.

bierJune 16, 2011 12:57 EST

Joder. He wrote that? I obviously missed that ridiculously idiotic statement.

Guess that's what I get for getting hung up on weissebier.

Has the author ever been to Europe? Somehow I doubt it.

AnonymousJune 16, 2011 12:57 EST

The article makes it sound as if Euskadi was the name for the Basque Country used by terrorists only, making it sound like a dirty world. They should know better, after all, one of the top cycling teams in the world is called Euskatel-Euskadi, after the main local telecoms provider and the name of the basque country en Euskera, the Basque language. Euskadi is a name commonly used not only in the Basque Country but in Spain in general, by people of every political current. The mentioning of terrorists has no place in an article about what is a beautiful part of Spain inhabited by peace loving people.

tangocyclistJune 21, 2011 22:08 EST

One super fine article, it captures the essence of the sport like no other. James Mitchnerish putting us right there in the pain zone. While doing Ryder's Tour d Victoria one can only imagine this super hereo of Canada preparing for the big leagues.

AnonymousJune 21, 2011 23:16 EST

I'm a huge fan of Hesjedal, but it's very difficult to take this article seriously, especially with the snide and completely inaccurate "Euskadi" comment. It is downright offensive. Does this magazine have no fact checkers? More importantly, does the author not care about the meanings of words? This is the kind of silly statement one expects from a high school magazine.

GordoJune 24, 2011 11:13 EST

As both a Canadian and a cyclist, I enjoyed this article immensely. To those of you who are so upset about the 'terrorist' comment, give it a rest. Michnerish captured the essence of professional cycling in this beautifully written article. To concentrate on his missteps and errors is to miss the whole point of the article. Give him a little room on those points (I'm sure he meant no offense) and enjoy the meat of what he has so skillfully crafted. It's about the cycling and he nailed it.

à blocJune 27, 2011 21:56 EST

I'm a former amateur racer and organizer in my fifties, and still enjoy a couple hours of excruciating intensity. I've read much of what's been written about road cycling in the last century, and this article describes the sheer pressure and suffering very, very well. It will always be difficult to communicate the physical aspects to non-cyclists, but a writer has done well if he finds a fresh way to relay this to road riders who know it all too well.

DougJune 28, 2011 09:58 EST

I enjoyed the article, as a cycling fan. However, as a Hispanophile of sorts I have to make this point: "Euskadi" can not only mean the Basque homeland (and not just to the local terrorist group as the author suggests) but is, more importantly, the language of the region, Euskara. To suggest (implicitly) that Euskadi is slang of a sort is to do a disservice not only to the region and its culture but as well to your readership.

AnonymousJune 28, 2011 13:42 EST

Agreed, Gordo, that it is about the cycling, and as such, a comment like that didn't inform the article; rather, it suggested an opinion on behalf of the author unrelated to cycling and more importantly, about sonmething the author is obviously not knowledgeable. It's not a matter of giving the author some leeway -it's a matter of accuracy and moreso, it's a matter of editing. An error on the part of the author and the magazine, and one which shows a certain amount of ignorance. Otherwise, well written.

MikeJune 28, 2011 13:43 EST

It is amazing to me that in all that wonderful prose some of you took exception to beer names and the explanation of the word Euskadi. You are entitled to be offended in the same way the writer is entitled to offend. It is most interesting to me that those elements stick out to the average reader the same way a few doping cases have tainted the reputations of all cyclists. I am pretty sure you can buy German beer in Belgium and that not everyone in the Basque region is a terrorist. I knew that before I read the article. What I did not know is how much I want Richard Poplak to keep writing about a sport I love so much.

AnonymousJuly 04, 2011 18:01 EST

Mike, I couldn\'t agree more. I\'m sure those so offended have meandered to another blog or aritcle to scrutinize in the same manner. This is a terrific article whether you enjoy cycling or not and allows the reader to truly gain an understanding of \"what it takes\" in this sport. Sorry to hear it has destroyed the experience for those few who jumped on the bandwagon of GAZMATAZ. It actually reads a little like the same guy. I see his insignificant point but let it go. Opps! Did I say bandwagon, that\'s right up there with the terrorist comment.

TimJuly 05, 2011 13:18 EST

Great Article!!! Awesome Ryder!!!! Ryder moved up 20 + places today (after a fan crash on day one) Garmin Cervelo is in YELLOW!!!!

fredfJuly 07, 2011 14:50 EST

Wow. A guy can't write an article on cycling...a beautiful and terrible sport... and do it beautifully without someone(s) getting their shorts in a knot over a slight reference to the Basque nation. The reference may be slightly inaccurate but certainly neither insulting nor worth the attention it got.

People, get a life!

JeffJuly 08, 2011 15:26 EST

Beautifully written piece about such a beautiful sport. Even with all the scandals cycling is still light years ahead of the NHL, NFL, and NBA clownshows typically fawned over by North American sports fans and the meatheads at TSN. I have nothing but respect for the pros, and this article really shines a light on just what must be sacrificed to reach that level.

Looking forward to more from Mr. Poplak.

AnonymousJuly 28, 2011 11:56 EST

Brilliantly written piece - some real gems, my favourite being \"in the sweet spot between consistently moderated effort and puking up your guts.\" I appreciated learning more about our Canadian hopeful, and believe that with his determination 2012 will be his year.

Peleton GirlJanuary 02, 2012 21:59 EST

Why does Alex Stieda always fail to be mentioned in Canadian articles about cycling? Before we get to Bauer it is Stieda! The 1st North American, albeit Canadian, to wear the Yellow Jersey in the TDF....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Stieda

The man from Belleville, Ontario.

Great article, but I suggest you take a little more time fact checking.

Add a comment

  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
June 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Foundation National Event Guide

The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone

12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto

The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?

6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary

The Walrus Laughs
The Walrus SoapBox