The Pain Principle

Cyclist Ryder Hesjedal is one of the best athletes in Canada. Can he suffer enough to become the best in the world?
A cycling team’s hotel floor looks like a geriatric ward: men lie prostrate on beds, pink feet pointing skyward. The hallway smells like baby shit, the eau de cologne of the endurance athlete — a day’s worth of fluid, food, and endorphins rinsed noisomely through the system. A cyclist gets up, eats, goes to the race, eats, races, eats while racing, eats once finished, returns to the hotel, eats, gets a massage, eats a lot, sleeps. There’s no outward sign that he is one of the best athletes on earth. If you came across him shopping for a Billy bookcase at IKEA, you’d assume he had just returned from an island survival challenge, which he lost. Badly.

The one thing all the statistics and studies and scientific assessments can’t deliver is cycling’s great intangible. By this I mean the transformation of agony into fuel, an alchemic process that is supernatural in its properties. For instance, to climb a fifteen-kilometre mountain pass at an average grade of 10 percent and a mean speed of twenty-five kilometres an hour is to sustain almost forty minutes of screaming pain without a second’s respite. The reward for being the best isn’t that one takes less pain; rather that one is able to absorb more. The nature of this process is revealed at the precise instant that we come to know ourselves completely: we learn how far we can push ourselves, and the true mettle of our character. But that knowledge isn’t properly intelligible, nor is it transferable. To mangle Laurie Anderson’s aphorism, writing about cycling’s meta-state is like dancing about architecture. It is a private knowledge, forged in pain’s stables, and belongs to men who are not served by articulating it.

All of which might explain the gravitas that blurs the edges of Ryder Hesjedal’s obviously sunny nature. It might explain why he can, at times, seem like a husk. Outside the Garmin camper, he takes a slow sip of his coffee, swirls the cup a bit more, tosses it into the garbage. I ask if he’s feeling yesterday in his legs.

“Nah, yesterday was fine. Had a good rest.” He slowly swings a leg up and over the frame’s top tube and clicks into his machine. “Be seeing you.” He rides off, and finishes fifth.

Aday later, I sit across from Hesjedal in my hotel room. He has just enjoyed a massage — which is to say his body has been viciously tenderized — and is on his way to dinner. (Watching food disappear into a cyclist’s maw is hilarious and awe inspiring and slightly nauseating.) I’m looking for something in his features — some flicker of the human. But his face is just sunburn over ashen skin, cold cuts on top of bone. On the third day of a Grand Tour in the Biscayne mountains, a cyclist’s face is not a face. The gentle frissons, those little signs we rely on to navigate our social relationships, are entirely absent.

“We grew up the real way,” Hesjedal says, telling me of life in the Highlands, outside Victoria, in the recession-plagued ’80s. “My dad didn’t have it so good at first; he cut and sold firewood. We got by.” When he and his sister were of school age, his father got a job with the municipality, and his mother followed. But those first years were hard: “My dad taught me that work ethic is important. It’s everything.”

Professional cycling has always been a working-class sport. Or, to put it the way the lefties used to, professional cycling has always exploited the working class: the French Red press in the ’20s famously described racers as forçats de la route — forced labourers of the road. Hesjedal very much falls into this working man archetype. (Its opposite, the aristocratic tradition, is exemplified by five-time Tour de France winner Jacques Anquetil, who, despite a humble upbringing, mimicked debauched eighteenth-century courtiers by, among other things, sleeping with his stepdaughter.) Hesjedal is defined by work. By focus. “I remember being in my basement, playing ball sports,” he says. “We had this half-wood, half-concrete wall. I’d take a lacrosse set and just whip the ball against the wall for hours on end. Until it was perfect.”

In the Highlands, everyone rode bicycles. Not like little Ryder Hesjedal did, though. On a heavy Norco Bushpilot, he rode the trails behind his house again and again and again, until he was sure no one in the world could ride them any faster. At thirteen years old, he understood that fun could morph into a vocation: mountain biking was booming; trails and legends were both being carved into the countryside. “That was my ticket,” he says.

“I remember telling my dad, ‘Listen, I need to focus on this.’ ” He was in grade eight at the time, and his father was understandably lukewarm. It didn’t help that his son was displaying some very real aptitude for baseball, a sport that typically pays a rookie second baseman about five times what a mountain biker can expect over the course of his career. Nonetheless Hesjedal and “Team Family” would strap his bike to the car, pack the camping gear, and screech out of the lot after school to make races in Kelowna, in Whistler, all over BC. And then, farther afield. “After World Champs [in Australia], I’d come back to class, and I’d explain what I’d done over the summer,” he says. “Kids were, like, ‘Huh?’ I felt like it was the best thing. As far as I was concerned, by that time I was probably one of the best in the world. It’s important to have that confidence and identity when you’re that young.”

Backed by a local enthusiast named David Smith, Hesjedal landed his first sponsorship deal with Marin bicycles when he was fifteen, and experienced the following decade through the fog of mountain bike racing. No late-night spliffs with the boys. No chasing girls. When two airliners slammed into the Twin Towers, he was at the world championships in Vail, Colorado. He was a fixture on the international circuit by the time he was seventeen, one of the best in the world by the time he was twenty — and burning out by the time he was twenty-three.

Imagine, for a moment, that you’re at the start line of the cross-country race in Athens, for the 2004 Olympics. You’re supremely fit, your entire being focused on this race for months, years. Five minutes in, just as the adrenalin is settling and your legs have started to sing, you feel telltale wheel drag. Flat tire, race over: “I didn’t finish, dropped out of Worlds two weeks later, and I haven’t raced a mountain bike since. For that to become your reality, it was pretty frustrating.”

In 2002, he signed with the road biking team Rabobank as a stagiaire (we’d say “rookie”) for the off-season. Most off-road racers spend a large portion of their time on the road, to build up overall endurance. Only a small few end up making the transition to road racing. Europe, home of the Grand Tours, was now in his blood. The physical demands were so enormous, the commitment so utter, that road racing became a magnet for his unshakable focus. He had suffered on the mountain bike, but he hadn’t suffered ecstatically. It was time to be swallowed whole.

When his Rabobank contract ended, in 2003, he signed with the world’s foremost racing team, US Postal Service. Postal was Lance Armstrong’s outfit, and it basically existed to deliver him a sixth straight Tour de France victory. Hesjedal rode as a domestique, the teammate who must sacrifice himself, race after race, so that the lead rider may win. Prime cannon fodder, the domestique limits the lead rider’s exposure to headwinds; he goes back to the car for bottles or food; he jostles with rivals in the tightly packed field to protect his leader. Hesjedal was now bottom dog on a team jammed with elite cyclists, all of whom had the podium in their crosshairs.

Like every domestique, he’d get late calls after a long day on the bike to race the following day on the other side of Europe. The work was unrelenting, soul breaking, and meanwhile cycling was being rocked by doping scandal after doping scandal, of which Lance Armstrong’s teams were often the fulcrum. Hesjedal’s vaunted focus was meaningless. He was not in control; he was floundering.

There is no proper way to watch a bike race. Not as a spectator along the side of the road, not in a follow car, and certainly not on TV, thrilling as all these may be. Perhaps one day we’ll invent a medium that will do the job, a 4-D mind-melding tech that marries the cyclist’s experience with that of the support team. Until then, it helps to keep in mind that the hundreds of vehicles behind the peloton (the main, regimented bunch of racers) form a shadow peloton, an obbligato that builds, over the course of the race, to its own Wagnerian crescendo. In a major race like the País Vasco, the peloton’s average speed seems only mildly insane — forty-five kilometres an hour or so — but the cyclists descend at speeds in excess of ninety kilometres, down mountain passes that were scraped out in the Dark Ages for mule trains. A professional cyclist will take a switchback at almost seventy kilometres an hour, which is nearly impossible for a car, unless that car happens to be piloted by a former pro cyclist, or a rally driver. Once you’ve sat in one of the hundred or so vehicles descending picturesque European mountain roads in convoy at highway speeds, you begin to grasp the vast, interlocking machinery of a bike race.

Previous · Page 2 of 4 · Next

21 comment(s)

Jane Victoria KingJune 15, 2011 02:11 EST

Not only a man from British Columbia... our local boy from Vancouver Island.
The Cycling Capital of Canada knows how to breed them... just sayin'.

Major NelsonJune 15, 2011 14:59 EST

I think you captured the essence of cycling in this article. Thankfully, you caught it from a person that exemplifies what sacrifices, pain, suffering and what becomes of pure talent. Though often depicted as a drug-addled society of rich kids, playing with sponsor’s money and fan's hopes and dreams, the reality is Ryder's life as explained here. It is a lonely, hard road, filled with many who agonize to cross a line where sometimes the crowd cheers. It is also hotel rooms that smell like 'baby poop' and talcum. I've sent this article to many of my fellow amateur riders, most of whom argue over the exploits of Lance Armstrong, nut have forgotten the army behind him who made him what he is (or portrayed to be) today. An army of spleen-punctured artists, journeymen, and misfortuned work-a-holics, strewn through the mountains of Europe, waiting for vultures to type in the latest results of the last race. Thanks for reminding us that there is more to cycling than yellow jerseys.

bierJune 15, 2011 16:42 EST

"a Belgian former cycling champion named Eric Van Lancker, once bigger in his home country than weissebier"

Apparently the author has Belgium - where they drink witbier/blanche -confused with Bavaria, where they drink weissebier.

Boy from BostonJune 15, 2011 18:42 EST

Great article. Found the link on VN.

As you noted, Ryder spent his earlier career as a mountainbike racer. I was a little surprised that there was no mention of his training partner Roland Green.

KevinJune 15, 2011 20:54 EST

You've written about road cycling in a way that not many have been able to, and I've read a lot. Please write a book or two on the sport, I could read this for years.

You only know how hard it is when you're willing your bike and body forward with every iota in your being, only to see the wheel ahead of your slipping away. Millimeters become centimeters, then meters, then minutes. It's a gorgeous sport.

gazmatazJune 16, 2011 01:36 EST

Good article but the whole thing was ruined by one sentence. I object vehemently to your description of the basque autonomous region: "Much is expected of him here in Basque Country, or Euskadi, as the local terrorist group calls it."

The implication that everyone who speaks the Basque language is a terrorist is incredibly offensive. The history of the Basque language, Basque people and Basque politics is very complicated and shouldn't be dismissed in one throw away remark that dismisses a whole people as terrorists. Please retract this statement and issue an apology to both your readers and to the Basque people who you have unfairly maligned.

bierJune 16, 2011 12:57 EST

Joder. He wrote that? I obviously missed that ridiculously idiotic statement.

Guess that's what I get for getting hung up on weissebier.

Has the author ever been to Europe? Somehow I doubt it.

AnonymousJune 16, 2011 12:57 EST

The article makes it sound as if Euskadi was the name for the Basque Country used by terrorists only, making it sound like a dirty world. They should know better, after all, one of the top cycling teams in the world is called Euskatel-Euskadi, after the main local telecoms provider and the name of the basque country en Euskera, the Basque language. Euskadi is a name commonly used not only in the Basque Country but in Spain in general, by people of every political current. The mentioning of terrorists has no place in an article about what is a beautiful part of Spain inhabited by peace loving people.

tangocyclistJune 21, 2011 22:08 EST

One super fine article, it captures the essence of the sport like no other. James Mitchnerish putting us right there in the pain zone. While doing Ryder's Tour d Victoria one can only imagine this super hereo of Canada preparing for the big leagues.

AnonymousJune 21, 2011 23:16 EST

I'm a huge fan of Hesjedal, but it's very difficult to take this article seriously, especially with the snide and completely inaccurate "Euskadi" comment. It is downright offensive. Does this magazine have no fact checkers? More importantly, does the author not care about the meanings of words? This is the kind of silly statement one expects from a high school magazine.

GordoJune 24, 2011 11:13 EST

As both a Canadian and a cyclist, I enjoyed this article immensely. To those of you who are so upset about the 'terrorist' comment, give it a rest. Michnerish captured the essence of professional cycling in this beautifully written article. To concentrate on his missteps and errors is to miss the whole point of the article. Give him a little room on those points (I'm sure he meant no offense) and enjoy the meat of what he has so skillfully crafted. It's about the cycling and he nailed it.

à blocJune 27, 2011 21:56 EST

I'm a former amateur racer and organizer in my fifties, and still enjoy a couple hours of excruciating intensity. I've read much of what's been written about road cycling in the last century, and this article describes the sheer pressure and suffering very, very well. It will always be difficult to communicate the physical aspects to non-cyclists, but a writer has done well if he finds a fresh way to relay this to road riders who know it all too well.

DougJune 28, 2011 09:58 EST

I enjoyed the article, as a cycling fan. However, as a Hispanophile of sorts I have to make this point: "Euskadi" can not only mean the Basque homeland (and not just to the local terrorist group as the author suggests) but is, more importantly, the language of the region, Euskara. To suggest (implicitly) that Euskadi is slang of a sort is to do a disservice not only to the region and its culture but as well to your readership.

AnonymousJune 28, 2011 13:42 EST

Agreed, Gordo, that it is about the cycling, and as such, a comment like that didn't inform the article; rather, it suggested an opinion on behalf of the author unrelated to cycling and more importantly, about sonmething the author is obviously not knowledgeable. It's not a matter of giving the author some leeway -it's a matter of accuracy and moreso, it's a matter of editing. An error on the part of the author and the magazine, and one which shows a certain amount of ignorance. Otherwise, well written.

MikeJune 28, 2011 13:43 EST

It is amazing to me that in all that wonderful prose some of you took exception to beer names and the explanation of the word Euskadi. You are entitled to be offended in the same way the writer is entitled to offend. It is most interesting to me that those elements stick out to the average reader the same way a few doping cases have tainted the reputations of all cyclists. I am pretty sure you can buy German beer in Belgium and that not everyone in the Basque region is a terrorist. I knew that before I read the article. What I did not know is how much I want Richard Poplak to keep writing about a sport I love so much.

AnonymousJuly 04, 2011 18:01 EST

Mike, I couldn\'t agree more. I\'m sure those so offended have meandered to another blog or aritcle to scrutinize in the same manner. This is a terrific article whether you enjoy cycling or not and allows the reader to truly gain an understanding of \"what it takes\" in this sport. Sorry to hear it has destroyed the experience for those few who jumped on the bandwagon of GAZMATAZ. It actually reads a little like the same guy. I see his insignificant point but let it go. Opps! Did I say bandwagon, that\'s right up there with the terrorist comment.

TimJuly 05, 2011 13:18 EST

Great Article!!! Awesome Ryder!!!! Ryder moved up 20 + places today (after a fan crash on day one) Garmin Cervelo is in YELLOW!!!!

fredfJuly 07, 2011 14:50 EST

Wow. A guy can't write an article on cycling...a beautiful and terrible sport... and do it beautifully without someone(s) getting their shorts in a knot over a slight reference to the Basque nation. The reference may be slightly inaccurate but certainly neither insulting nor worth the attention it got.

People, get a life!

JeffJuly 08, 2011 15:26 EST

Beautifully written piece about such a beautiful sport. Even with all the scandals cycling is still light years ahead of the NHL, NFL, and NBA clownshows typically fawned over by North American sports fans and the meatheads at TSN. I have nothing but respect for the pros, and this article really shines a light on just what must be sacrificed to reach that level.

Looking forward to more from Mr. Poplak.

AnonymousJuly 28, 2011 11:56 EST

Brilliantly written piece - some real gems, my favourite being \"in the sweet spot between consistently moderated effort and puking up your guts.\" I appreciated learning more about our Canadian hopeful, and believe that with his determination 2012 will be his year.

Peleton GirlJanuary 02, 2012 21:59 EST

Why does Alex Stieda always fail to be mentioned in Canadian articles about cycling? Before we get to Bauer it is Stieda! The 1st North American, albeit Canadian, to wear the Yellow Jersey in the TDF....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Stieda

The man from Belleville, Ontario.

Great article, but I suggest you take a little more time fact checking.

Add a comment

  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
June 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Foundation National Event Guide

The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone

12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto

The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?

6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary

The Walrus Laughs
The Walrus SoapBox