The Farms Are Not All Right

The growing gap between what they produce and what they earn is driving many farmers off the land. The crisis in Canadian farming
Illustration by Scott McKowen
For my daughter’s fifth birthday, her friend Jake Ferguson arrived with a picture he had drawn himself. They’ve known each other since they were in daycare together at the age of two; they interact easily, like siblings, and she accepted the drawing with casual thanks and little fanfare. My wife and I were much more taken with it.

The picture was an assemblage of large rectangular shapes on outsize wheels, a big hunk of machinery coloured in a vaguely familiar scheme of bright green and yellow. We already knew Jake was an obsessive fan of big trucks and industrial equipment — his mother, Zoe, once told us he awaited the launch of a new season of Mighty Machines the way our daughter, Sloane, anticipates the latest Pixar release, and Zoe sometimes entertained her son by reading to him from farm equipment catalogues. Still, there was something uncommonly touching about his gift of a picture of the machine he loved the most: a John Deere combine harvester.

“I tried to tell him Sloane might want something else,” his mother told us as we grinned at the drawing. “Maybe she’d like it better if he drew flowers or her favourite animal or something like that.”

Jake’s brusque reply: “Who doesn’t love a combine?”

Zoe Ferguson grew up on a farm in southeastern Alberta, and her father and brother still work the land there. Jake had spent weekends and lazy summer days on the farm since he was an infant, riding alongside his grandfather in the big new combine every chance he got. He is intimately familiar with tractors and sprayers and irrigation pivots; the first time I ever heard the term “air seeding,” it was from Jake.

As I examined his combine drawing, rich with detail I never would have known to include, it struck me that, at five years old, Jake knew more about the actual work of modern farming than I did. I’m an obsessive food shopper, a stalker of farmers’ markets, and a relentless seeker of obscure ingredients. I make a mean Thai curry, and I can tell you exactly where in Calgary to find the sweetest Hutterite carrots and the freshest homemade tortillas. But I couldn’t tell you with any precision what a combine even does. I know an awful lot about food but almost nothing about where it comes from, who grows it, and how. I think this makes me a pretty typical urban Canadian.

Food is a perpetual hot topic — it is, after all, one of the few consumer products that become part of our bodies. But even as food security, safety, and health have risen on the public agenda, the conversation has focused entirely too much on the contradictory lines of what we want — more local, fewer chemicals, more options, greater convenience — and far too little on how to get it. We don’t talk about whose job it is to provide it, how they should be compensated, and, in particular, how to close what turns out to be a yawning gap between our needs as consumers, at one end of the supply chain, and theirs as farmers at the other. What follows, then, is a modest attempt to discover how food is actually produced in Canada, and how we might like it to be produced by the time Jake will be ready to drive a combine of his own.

Jaques Farm Ltd. operates from a 550-hectare spread of irrigated land alongside the Red Deer River in southeastern Alberta. The riverbank forms the farm’s southern limit; an irrigation ditch curves north across a thin patch of forested flood plain and a fallow field littered with old farm equipment, emptying into a wide pond. Jake Ferguson’s grandparents, Arthur and Heather Jaques (rhymes with “snakes”) occupy a handsome new ranch house that hugs the irrigation pond’s south bank.

A wide yard encircled by a windbreak of irrigated trees and populated by pickup trucks and tractors and four-wheel ATVs stretches out to one side of the house, hemmed in on the far side by two gleaming new Quonset huts, each more than fifty metres long. The primary farmland, planted with an annually rotated mix of grains, oilseeds (mostly canola), and pulses (Great Northern beans for the past few years), forms a wide semicircle around this central node. The fields are bisected by long, humped steel spans that look to the untrained eye like scaffolding laid on its side — these are irrigation pivots, great long sprinkler systems on wheels that rotate around the planted fields. The farm is bounded on the north by steep, bald hills that appear denuded from a distance but are in fact thick with sage and cactus, attesting to the need for the pivots. At the far end of one field, due north of the irrigation pond, sits another house, slightly older and more modest, where thirty-six-year-old Byron Jaques, Jake’s uncle and the fourth generation of Jaques men to farm the Alberta prairie, lives with his wife and two young daughters.

The nearest city is the dusty regional centre of Brooks, roughly 120 kilometres to the southwest. Many of the other dots on the map around here — Buffalo, for example, the place name on the Jaques family’s mail — constitute little more than a crossroads with a gas station or, in the case of Buffalo, a shuttered gas station. The land is dry and gently rolling, riven with deep gullies and half-hidden coulees. Down in the river valleys, deer, antelope, and rabbits are abundant, and signs warn of rattlesnakes on the road. It is starkly beautiful country and faintly primordial; Dinosaur Provincial Park, one of the richest fossil troves on the planet, lies just eighty kilometres upriver.

The farmland along the local range roads is strewn with humps of black steel pipe, which are encircled in heavy fencing painted a warning shade of orange; they resemble caged serpents in a vast arena. There are also gas wells and compressor stations and signs bearing Husky and Cenovus logos, all of it testifying to the rich hydrocarbon bounty beneath the soil. Jaques Farm ships all of its crops off-site for processing before any of them are sold, but the farm consumes its own fossil fuel, making it entirely self-sufficient for its natural gas needs.

I arrived just before dusk on a clear spring evening in the middle of planting, and Heather Jaques drove me out right away to observe the last of the day’s work. I found a John Deere 8120 tractor backed up against a trailer fitted with a big white steel bin. Attached to the rear was a seeding machine, an eight-pronged furrowing apparatus with a yellow plastic tub, or hopper, mounted atop each prong. These were filled to varying degrees with white pellets speckled in jellybean hues of blue or pink — treated Great Northern bean seeds. Sacks in the back of a nearby pickup truck read Danger Treated with Maxim Apron XL Streptomycin, a blend of bactericide, fungicide, and insecticide.

Every so often, two work-gloved hands appeared at the lip of the big steel bin overhead, holding aloft a red plastic pail. Byron Jaques was inside the bin, mixing the last of the seeds with a nitrogen-fixing inoculant called NitraStik-D (“This inoculant guarantees a minimum of 100 million viable cells of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv phaseoli per gram”) and hoisting them out. Arthur Jaques, in sturdy workboots and rust-coloured Carhartt overalls, took each new bucket in turn and dumped it into one of the eight hoppers on the seeding machine, taking care to measure the levels equally. Once Arthur had loaded the tubs, Byron climbed out of the bin and jumped into the tractor. I joined him in the cab as he made his last seeding pass of the spring over his bean field.

It was full dark now, and the field beyond the tractor’s headlights was a rumour. No matter: the action was all on a small GPS screen mounted to the right of the steering wheel. It showed a gridded field of grey, much of it filled with tidy squares of blue that represented the land already seeded. A small digital pictograph of a tractor at the bottom of the screen pointed directly at the last narrow grey band of unseeded field, tracking our progress.

Byron has an engineer-like disposition toward his work, focused and slightly anxious yet somehow offhand. When I asked how it all worked, he tapped the GPS, flipping over to a screen that traced the data stream guiding us. Multiple satellites spun within range in the stratosphere high above us, and they traded information with the tractor’s GPS through a receiver in the main farmyard. A radio antenna on the tractor’s roof received minute corrections to the vehicle’s trajectory, based on triangulations calculated between the various satellites. Both of Byron’s hands left the steering wheel as he fiddled with the GPS, which was doing the steering; it controlled a hydraulic valve down at axle level, precise to less than an inch, making sure the streak of blue on this pass up the field didn’t cover any of the same pixels the previous one had, nor leave the slightest of gaps.

Home · Page 1 of 5 · Next

7 comment(s)

Jim HairSeptember 20, 2011 11:32 EST

Great article, from a farm perspective, it's very even handed and informative.

Just one thing, the cow milk production per year would be 8,500-9,500 Kilograms/year, not tonnes.

Pamela DixonOctober 02, 2011 11:01 EST

Last week I went to my local Calgary co-op and noticed that not one of the apples had a Canadian passport. To be honest, I was a little disappointed and made the decision not to make baked apples this week.

Why can't we buy apples from B.C.? Why do I have to drive an hour to get to a local farmer's market?

This article answered a lot of the questions I had. I look forward to reading more about the shift towards locally produced, sustainable farming in the future.

Mary EllenOctober 04, 2011 16:47 EST

Thank you for presenting farming as it really is. I am curious though, do the farms presented in this story have off farm income? 90% of North American farms have off farm income, supplementing their farms to provide food for the masses. The David Suzuki Foundation issued a report several months ago that small farms can produce more per acre, employ more people, use less fossil fuel etc that large scale counterparts.
The problems farms face in turning or starting to farm differently is solely financial.
Unless you start with large scale conventional farming there is no money available to grow a smaller scale sustainable and environmentally friendly farm. For more information see www.citypalate.ca article on Slow Money.

Jan SteinmanOctober 04, 2011 16:48 EST

I just about cried when I read of Jan Slomp's premium grass-fed organic milk being mixed into the monopoly milk marketing board stream, which undoubtedly includes antibiotic-laced milk from confinement dairy operations.

Why isn't Slomp standing up with Michael Schmidt and others who put their life savings and livelihood on the line in order to show that another way of producing and thinking about food is possible, let alone necessary?

Don't get me wrong, I deeply appreciate Slomp's deep care that he puts into alternative dairying, but he's so close to making a larger difference than he could possibly make on his own farm.

There is a crying need for quality raw milk out there, and the unholy alliance of milk marketing boards and public health authorities rubs individuals into the ground who try to service this market. Because raw, organic, grass-fed milk is a premium market, conscientious small farmers can make a go of it — in many ways, it's "get small, or get out," because big operations simply cannot provide raw milk in a safe and quality way. And they know this, and they use the government to stifle competition from a product they cannot produce. Amid all the sword-rattling about "free markets," the current situation in dairy is one of stifled innovation.

I hope Jan Slomp sees his way forward to providing his premium product, whether raw, or pasteurized, to people who appreciate it for what it is. Because as long as he's selling to the monopoly milk marketing board, he's part of the problem, not the solution.

JimDickieOctober 04, 2011 16:48 EST

"His yields started to drop, but so did his costs"

That is one of the most important statements in the whole article, and should be used to argue in favour of organic farming to those not aware or concerned with the health risks associated with conventional.

Organic farming can certainly "feed the world" whatever than means, but it can't be applied on industrial scale. For economic, social and ecological reasons, we have to find a way to get back to a network for small, diversified family farms.

Alex GillOctober 05, 2011 16:15 EST

Mr Tuner presents in this article an illuminating insight into the economics of Canadian farming and raises some excellent questions about the economic and ecological sustainability of current practise in an industry that is crucial to the existence of our civilisation. However, I was rather disappointed by his uncritical inclusion of comments on the claimed benefits of raw milk.

As a food safety microbiologist I would not claim to comment knowledgeably on the claimed nutritional benefits of raw milk but I am very aware of the published research on the microbial safety of milk and other dairy products. For the same reasons that milk is an excellent nutritional source for humans, it is an excellent medium for the growth many disease causing bacteria. Prior to the introduction of pasteurisation it was a common cause of exposure to debilitating and lethal bacteria such as Tuberculosis, Brucella, Salmonella and pathogenic Escherichia coli, such as E. coli O157:H7

Unfortunately, though good management practices can be of some benefit in improving the safety of dairy products they can not prevent the contamination of milk by bacteria. Consequently, in Canada and the US there continue to be regular reports of disease outbreaks due to the consumption of raw milk. These outbreaks are rarely reported outside of the public health literature, as they are often limited to an immediate family group, due to the legal restrictions on the distribution of raw milk.

Mandatory pasteurisation was introduced to control the burden of disease and mortality associated with raw milk, a burden that fell heaviest upon infants and children. The success of this policy is demonstrated by the virtual absence of infectious illness attributable to commercially distributed milk and ironically by the calls for the removal of pasteurisation by those who have benefited from it. In this the raw milk enthusiasts are another demonstration of the phenomena noted by Mr Turner of the general ignorance of the underlying processes of a food production.

NoreenNovember 14, 2011 14:17 EST

“For me, that raises food security alarm bells, because every farmer washed out of the system represents farm knowledge and farm skill washed out of the system.”

Without the ability to raise and grow our own food we are at risk. We are left to depend on other countries to feed us. We risk our own independence and put our fate in the hands of countries that will look after their own people first in times of drought or hardship.

This is one of the more troubling issues around the farming industry now. We shouldn't be making ourselves that vunerable however farmers should be making an income that supports them for the work that they do. It is important that we have the ability to support ourselves for future generations.

Add a comment

  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
June 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Foundation National Event Guide

The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone

12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto

The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?

6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary

The Walrus Laughs
The Walrus SoapBox