A Rock and a Hard Place

The energy industry calls fracking a game changer, but environmentalists compare it to coal and oil. As energy demands collide with climate change, the question becomes whether fracking is worth the risk
Illustration by Paul Kim

Related LinkA Look Underground
by Encana Corporation
A Look Underground
Bouncy music and colouring book graphics introduce “A Look Underground,” a short video uploaded to YouTube last year by the Calgary-based Encana Corporation “to educate children about natural gas development.” In the demonstration, engineer Mark Taylor explains the principles of hydraulically fracturing shale and recovering natural gas to a dozen kids ranging from toddlers to preteens. The children stand gathered around a structure built from cupcakes arranged in a horseshoe, its top iced a vivid green and decorated with plastic trees and farm animals. A thick layer of white icing represents the shale layer below. Taylor shows how drillers push steel pipe down deep through the chocolate “earth” to the coveted shale, an operation depicted with plastic tubing. Next, he says, “we basically load it up with explosive charges like big firecrackers, and we blast holes into spots all along the way, so the gas can come out of the white shale here and into our well.”

It’s not a bad description of the process that has transformed North America’s fuel forecast and global energy politics within the lifetime of Taylor’s audience. And the subtext is one the gas industry hopes consumers will easily digest: that unconventional natural gas is as wholesome and safe as kindergarten. The hydraulic fracturing the video describes, also known as hydro-fracking, or simply fracking, is the sine qua non of the new gas, the key that has unlocked massive supplies of fossil energy once thought to be out of reach. Conventional gas sits in discrete underground pools; all it takes to get at it is to stick a straw down into the right place. But geologists have long known that much more natural gas remains sequestered in the minute pockets between the grains of certain types of rock. In most cases, fracking uses water with additives to shatter the rock, creating fissures that enable the gas to flow into a well.

First used to access gas in the American and Canadian West, where the process has been used on tens of thousands of wells, fracking has made a growing number of unconventional gas beds viable for recovery. Formations rich in gas micro-pores are strung in a patchy U across North America, beginning in British Columbia’s far northeast; trailing down the eastern slope of the Rocky Mountains (with significant stores through Alberta, Saskatchewan, and North Dakota); and then sweeping across the southern US to a long band of gas-bearing shale that runs under half a dozen eastern states and up into Canada. The last in particular — the Marcellus Shale, which lies tantalizingly close to the energy-hungry markets of the eastern seaboard — has the industry salivating. Based on usage today, according to the Canadian Society for Unconventional Gas, Canada has enough frackable gas to maintain current production for about a hundred years.

Fracking has altered North America’s fuel supply so explosively that a gas bubble has saturated the market, driving down prices in recent quarters. Simultaneously, however, estimates of the abundance of unconventional gas have rescued producers from inevitable eclipse as conventional production declines. Instead, the industry has embraced a bold new ambition: to position gas as the economy’s energy mainstay, a fossil fuel as cheap and plentiful as coal, only cleaner and greener. Environmentalists, meanwhile, link fracking to a host of injuries to water, air, humans and wildlife, and to the integrity of ecosystems. France has banned the practice, and the European Union is toying with similar prohibitions.

Industrialized humanity exhausts more than 500 exajoules of energy each year, for every purpose from growing food to opening the door. That’s roughly the equivalent of setting off a Hiroshima-sized bomb every five seconds. In Canada, gas supplies more than one-quarter of the energy we use (I heated my shower with it this morning) but barely half the amount we extract from coal and oil — sources that environmentalists deplore even more than frack gas. And as much as we might like to see those sources replaced by renewable energy, that also comes with limits and costs.

The story of fracking, then, is a story about risk, about those unavoidable contingencies we face and trade off every day as individuals and communities, weighing our wants (income, a warm home, a good Christmas sales season) against the effort, cost, or hazards of getting it: a collision on the commute, a dammed-up river somewhere, a slightly warmer climate. Rarely is the answer kindergarten-simple.

East of Calgary, the snow-dusted prairie is the white of the December sky. Dropping into a coulee, the bare two-lane blacktop turns sharply right at the hamlet of Rosebud, and I follow a side street buried under fresh snow before circling to a dead end in front of Jessica Ernst’s house. A shy environmental biologist with long, straight, greying hair, she ushers me in and offers me hand-knitted socks to ward off the floor’s chill. Her living room and kitchen are cluttered with the artifacts of daily life: house keys, small tools, correspondence — lots of correspondence. Several walls hold examples of her one financial indulgence, art. Prominent are works by Marianna Gartner, a Vancouver artist who sets disturbing portraits of pale children — some with tattoos, or skulls for heads — in surreal landscapes that might be dreams or nightmares.

Ernst’s reality has been mostly the latter since early 2005, when she began to suspect something was wrong with her plumbing. Her bathtub faucet whistled loudly, as though air were being forced out of it. Small black grains clogged her kitchen tap. The water in her toilet fizzed as if it were full of Alka-Seltzer. She developed a skin rash so severe that her doctor compared it to industrial burns. In a touch out of Stephen King, her dogs backed away from their water dishes.

Ernst has worked in the oil patch for decades, mainly advising companies on how to lighten their impact on the communities where they operate. She knew that Encana, one of North America’s largest unconventional gas producers, with operations in the US, BC, and Alberta, had been drilling in a coalfield beneath the nearby hills, known as the Horseshoe Canyon Formation. She also knew that her own water well, which had run clean and pure since 1986, drew on parts of that same formation. She conducted a simple test, running tap water into a mug, then lighting a match and waving it beside the lip. A yellow-orange flame spread across the water. For her next homespun experiment, she partly filled a plastic pop bottle with water and tightened the cap. A minute later, holding a lit match near the bottle’s neck, she unscrewed the cap. The bottle exploded, shooting a blue flame like a rocket.

Home · Page 1 of 6 · Next

9 comment(s)

Stephen BugdenNovember 10, 2011 00:17 EST

Chris Wood's article is a must read for both sides of the fracking/shale gas exploration debate. Here in New Brunswick, where our provincial government has declared its intent to pursue development, those of us calling for a moratorium welcome such well balanced reporting.
The environmental and economic risks accompanying shale gas exploration and development cannot be underestimated. Justification by so-called "experts" for non-conventional drilling and fracking is too often only the regurgitation of industry talking points.
Now is the time to place a hold on the industry, until it can prove that avoidance of environmental damage and "accidents" is its first concern.
If only our government had those same interests at heart!

Anthony BritneffNovember 14, 2011 14:17 EST

Excellent article.

For more good writing on fracking and for some badly needed recommendations on how to proceed in British Columbia, see Ben Parfitt's report titled "Fracking Up Our Water, Hydro Power and Climate" at:

http://www.policyalternatives.ca/fracking

Chris WoodNovember 14, 2011 22:48 EST

Update:

One sentence in my story is no longer quite true: "Yet CAPP’s Janet Annesley may be right when she insists that no case has ever proven that fluids released during a frack have contaminated groundwater."

The US EPA has just reported frack fluid constituents detected in the aquifer supplying drinking water to Pavillion, Wyoming, at the heart of a heavily fracked unconventional gas play. For more see: http://www.propublica.org/article/epa-finds-fracking-compound-in-wyoming-aquifer

Rachel GieseNovember 14, 2011 22:49 EST

Propublica has reported that the EPA recently found a fracking compound in an acquifer in Pavilion, Wyoming. According to the story:

"The Pavillion area has been drilled extensively for natural gas over the last two decades and is home to hundreds of gas wells. Residents have alleged for nearly a decade that the drilling — and hydraulic fracturing in particular — has caused their water to turn black and smell like gasoline. Some residents say they suffer neurological impairment, loss of smell, and nerve pain they associate with exposure to pollutants.

The gas industry — led by the Canadian company EnCana, which owns the wells in Pavillion — has denied that its activities are responsible for the contamination. EnCana has, however, supplied drinking water to residents."

For more: www.propublica.org/article/epa-finds-fracking-compound-in-wyoming-aquifer

s gateleyNovember 17, 2011 11:07 EST

Hey Canadians,

are you aware that over here in NYS the Gov is heading towards fracking fast and furious and a proposal is in the works to 'treat" zillions of gallons of low level radioactive and chemical waste from it thru the 'state of the art' water plant in Niagara Falls?
Charcoal filters will not remove all the radioactive materials or the many carcinogenic chemicals.

We are talking huge amounts of potentially hazardous water going into Lake Ontario and last I knew most of the people drinking it were Canadian!
Tell Gov Cuomo it's a bad idea
his number is 518 474 8390. Tell him you wont send any more Quebec electrons down to NYC (Ha that's a joke a poor one admittedly)
more info at my blog lake ontario log on line at silver waters dot come.

Don WhiteleyNovember 18, 2011 16:17 EST

I've been writing about this stuff for years — but this is one of the best pieces of journalism I've read on the topic. Fair and balanced to everyone, incredibly well-researched, and puts the whole issue into context. I'm envious. And I've spent time in Rosebud — neat place.

GeoffreyMayNovember 18, 2011 18:55 EST

Why does the author not refer to the Howarth study directly,except to say industry attacked it ( were the attacks credible ?,was there a defence ?)

Why does the author not mention Stephen Orborn's study showing thermagenic methane in gas production area water wells?

Why does the author not mention Theo Colborn's "Natural Gas Production From a Public Health Perspective ?

Why does the author ignore the air pollution from every single aspect of gas production, pre and post frac ? from drilling to condensers, compressors , odorizers, pipelines ?

Why does the author ignore the noise,light and industrialization of rural communities issues ?

Why does the author grant one of Jessica Ernst's alleged neighbors anonymity so that he can slander her in print ?

And why does the author mention one frac'ing communication incident in BC when there have been at least 18?

And why when the author gives a few examples of things going wrong, doe he not mention that he hasn't even begun to scratch the surface ?

Robert CalhounDecember 19, 2011 10:55 EST

Did I miss somthing in this article?
Propane fracing appears to eliminate polution, structure distotion, while enhancing productivity.

Your ECO friendJanuary 02, 2012 21:59 EST

Good article on Fracking. Liguids will always find the easiest route... I hope outside of our drinking water.

Terry

http://www.yourecofriend.com/fracking-and-your-drinking-water

Add a comment

  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
June 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Foundation National Event Guide

The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone

12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto

The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?

6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary

The Walrus Laughs
The Walrus SoapBox