Brand Me

Gen Y personal branders are clogging Internet browsers with self-portraits, product endorsements, and the minutiae of their days. A Gen-Xer asks if we have any right to hate them
Stewart seems sunny and rather sweet, a twenty-nine-year-old who blogs about going to the gym, hanging out with her friends, and sunbathing topless — though she says she prefers not to “show my boobs” as others in her peer group do, “because my mom reads my blog.” (In her teens, she posed in a not-so-fashionable bikini as a Sunshine Girl in the Toronto Sun.) When I check Klout, a company that “identifies influencers on topics across the social web,” I find her score is a healthy fifty-eight out of 100. The Klout score is an entirely scary invention that quantifies registrants’ ubiquity and audience reach by looking at their social media profiles and interactions. Gregory Gorgeous ranks a sixty-one. Lauren O’Nizzle, a friend and digital soulmate of Stewart’s, scores a sixty-three. Kim Kardashian’s hovers around ninety-two.

I see where Stewart is coming from. For someone with small-town roots (Cambridge, Ontario), living large in the big city of Toronto is a thrill. She runs her personal brand as a full-time job, having been fired from a marketing position at Much mtv for excessive blogging on the job. She employs a paid intern, and has managed to climb out of a tuition-fuelled $30,000 debt through an appearance on the W Network’s financial makeover show, Maxed Out. She now makes bank by speaking to companies about ramping up their social media strategies.

“The brand,” she says, “is bigger than me now.” When she describes how she built it, I’m reminded of an interview I read with marketer Hubert Rampersad, author of the bestseller Authentic Personal Branding: A New Blueprint for Building and Aligning a Powerful Leadership Brand, part of a recent pack of books instructing us all to self-market. Branding, he writes, is about controlling the impression people have of you, and making that impression desirable (which is not, of course, the cakewalk these authors make it out to be). Building an authentic personal brand is a way of “improving yourself continuously.” Though we’re obsessive about improvement, my generation might feel almost as embarrassed touting Rampersad’s advice as we would be donning folk costumes and dancing the mazurka. But because Stewart’s peers have not known self-doubt as much as we have, and because they’re so much better at manoeuvring in the digital age than we were, they feel perfectly at ease. “I think to myself,” Stewart says, “that I created all this by putting out positive thoughts and accepting things into my life. I dreamt about doing this — getting the star treatment — and now I am.”

Sidling up to every willing PR agent, then, is a Millennial way to present the authentic self, about as awkward and disingenuous as New Age was thirty years ago. Yet Stewart seems blissfully, radiantly, ear-to-ear happy.

But not everyone finds their bliss in doing dumb stuff: not style and society blogger Nolan Bryant, who is about to turn twenty. Though his mini-fame resulted from his smart use of digital resources, he is nothing like Casie Stewart. For him, the star treatment is a beast of a different stripe. A follower of fashion since childhood, he is known for his long hair and his six-foot-five stature, and for wearing capes. Those who follow his personal brand assume he comes from money. In truth, like the Factory crew orbiting Andy Warhol, or Truman Capote orbiting Babe Paley and Slim Keith, he is enthralled with the rich and famous. His budding career is as a social chronicler/new media socialite, and he’s good at it.

Another small-town kid (from Newcastle, Ontario), Bryant belongs to a WASP family, he says, but not a society one. His father worked in corporate communications, promoting hotels for Fairmont. As a boy of six, he would find himself sitting rapt in the Library Bar of the Royal York Hotel. “I believe the socially affluent in Toronto to be fascinating,” he says, paraphrasing a Herb Caen quote about “cockroaches and socialites being the only things that can stay up all night and eat anything.”

Bryant began attending Toronto Fashion Week shows when he was in grade nine, via an aunt who worked at CBC and had a connection to the television show Fashion File. That was the era, he says, when “everyone worked in magazines or was a buyer.” Now, he observes, “everyone is a blogger. Everyone has a Twitter account. So many of them hang around outside at fashion shows, taking pictures of people in weird outfits. That’s not for me.” He had bigger aspirations. Through a friendship with Marissa Bronfman (of the Seagram Bronfmans), whom he met at Fashion Week, he became well known to the right PR people, was photographed for the party pages, and found himself in the front rows alongside the reed-thin elite. He took their pictures, which provided much of the content for nolanbryant.com, which he launched in 2008. The exposure brought him attention, including an invitation by Hugo Boss to shoot the company’s collection at Berlin Fashion Week in 2010.

When we meet for coffee, I find it remarkable that he is only nineteen; he is so self-confident and measured. “I wear the fun clothes, I blog about it, and I socialize,” he says when I ask him to describe what defines his personal brand. He also understands the line between self-promotion and exploitation. “When you’re photographed by the party pages, they always list your name and where you work. In the beginning, it was just my name. I wanted to go to events and have something else people could say about me.”

What he was really doing, like so many others, was looking for a way to present his identity — which is, in the end, the purpose of youth. It’s just that he started with a baseline the teenagers of my era lacked. As well as the digital tools, he possessed an uncannily solid sense of himself. Like all socialites on the ascent, confidence became his key. His generation lives out life in public; my generation chose to lurk in the shadows, scared shitless about what others thought of us. To paraphrase Henry Rollins, we spent half of our lives screwing up, and the other half making up for it. Bryant and his peers strode purposefully out of the gate. This, at the very least, is admirable.

Ifind no new media arriviste more sure of herself than Sarah Nicole Prickett, a brand who craves some distance from the Blondebots of the world. She doesn’t consider herself a style blogger, although she blogs about style (and happens to be blond). That label would put her in the wider concentric circle of online personalities whose ambitions are shallow, whose observations are generic, and whose writing is poor.

Meanwhile, she struggles with a few categories of her own. “I’m a Millennial, right?” she asks me. “I keep reading about how unhappy we supposedly are.” One such piece happens to appear on the cover of New York magazine the week she and I meet in a downtown Toronto restaurant called the Böhemian Gastropub. (When she points out how awful the name is, and I agree, I’m left wondering which of our generations has the bigger compulsion to comment on everything.)

The New York cover shows a guy I can only describe as an emo — which is probably no longer a Millennially correct designation — shot in black and white and looking nobly tragic. The line across his chest says, “Sucks to Be Us.” The story is about children of over-praising parents, kids who grow up to Google Chat and live in angst in Brooklyn. Held up as symbols of “post-hope America,” they are described as “screwed, coddled, self-absorbed, mocked,” yet “surprisingly resilient.”

Many of these adjectives might seem appropriate — but not “screwed.” Prickett strikes me as neither unhappy nor disadvantaged. Her red lipstick is too flawless, her five-inch wedge platforms imperially high. By her own account, she is right where she wants to be, and is far more in control of her personal image at twenty-six than I was of mine at thirty-six. She has a career as a freelance writer for the National Post, the Toronto Standard, and Fashion magazine. She confidently calls herself a “good writer.” (I wouldn’t have had the guts to say that about my own writing at twenty-six — or forty!) And she has something her 5,000 or so Twitter followers consider significant: a growing status as a new media personality and party fixture. Strangers refer to her by the abbreviation SNP, and when visitors read her site, snprickett.com, which has seventeen sections, like a lifestyle magazine, they will assume she is the centre of a magnificent universe. It’s more accurate to call her a big fish in the medium-sized pond of Toronto fashion.
Previous · Page 2 of 3 · Next

19 comment(s)

AnonymousJanuary 30, 2012 15:43 EST

bash social media gen-Yers, get free publicity for the walrus, well played maryam, well played. you’d figure she’d pick on someone her own age ;)

AlexJanuary 30, 2012 17:33 EST

Are there really no comments? Is Gen X following its MO? Is Gen Y reading this?

Personally, I not sure I’ve really encountered this subset of my supposed generation (Y). Maybe its the field I’m in (design), but I see a lot more initiative being taken to realize ideas that my peers truly believe in, whether its a business or a personal project.

What I personally don’t see is a generation driven to self-promotion without a larger cause, sense of purpose, or direction. If anything, I see the promotion of ideas over the promotion of self.

So, I definitely have to say thanks! I really appreciate the perspective on what I haven’t been exposed to.

What I ask now is: what can you say about what I do see? Because there’s definitely another side to this.

And what about this group? http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/162/generation-flux-future-of-business

AlexJanuary 30, 2012 17:33 EST

(Apologies to Anonymous. I didn’t see your comment, as I was reading/posting.)

Gen X, really?January 30, 2012 17:33 EST

don't you have 'children' to pick on? these young people are the future of our media, why cut them down?

AntsJanuary 31, 2012 00:02 EST

It's curious that Ms. Sanati views herself as so different (a whole generation different!) from the writers and bloggers profiled in this piece. Many of her contemporaries in Toronto media (for example, Leah McLaren, Rebecca Eckler, Russell Smith) made names for themselves with an identical navel-gazing, over-sharing style of writing. They (and she, I assume) also attended and attend social events and, perhaps, accept a PR gift every once in a while too. It's true that social media has made it possible for an individual unaffiliated with a traditional press outlet to be as exposed and spoiled as his or her columnist cousins but that's a story about old media vs. new media snobbery and not the condescending tale of personal branding published here.

Poet ScientistJanuary 31, 2012 00:02 EST

Don't worry darlings, no one reads the Walrus anyways.

Simon PlashkesJanuary 31, 2012 08:41 EST

Brand Me is an unapologetic generational confession (damnation revelry, embrace of isolation, and persistent self-loathing) masked as a poor critique of kids these days. Shouldn’t this approach be below Maryam Sanati, Editorial Director, Toronto Life Magazine? Maybe it’s a generational thing.

In far less than a sprawling 3,300 words, here’s the deal:

The point has been missed. Examples shared aren’t just shallow self-promotion; they are expressions of collective storytelling and group identity creation. While the emphasis at the top is on ‘personal branding’, it’s really mass self-determination and continuous reinvention experimenting faster than we’ve ever seen. (Sounds a whole lot better than pick your breakfast club clique and stick with it, ya?).

Discussed here is only the tip of the iceberg – what really matters is a follow-on effect of self-expression and identity experimentation for billions of people. And those called out in Brand Me are cultural evolution and expression leaders. Is it too shallow and banal? Do posts fail to live up to the (supposed) editorial rigor of Toronto Life and the Walrus? That’s a matter of opinion – for many, the backstage view is even more prized than the polished final product. We get to see the artist at work, to learn her trade of aspirational self-creation.

Proficiency in aspirational self-creation is a good thing! For the simple reason that people usually aspire to be better than they are, we should praise that which empowers people to do this better.

Ah, but the real excitement is what comes next. What will millions of people (of all ages), now highly experienced in creating themselves and the world around decide to manifest? How will a network of empathetic connection (clearly missing in GenX) influence our cultural next? Hint: better solutions to isolation, global community, empathy.

It takes real guts to stand up to the world, open the doors, and say: “I am not sure who I am yet, but do you want to watch me figure it out?” Those who can, contribute to fast and connected cultural evolution, and do their best to make a better world along the way. Thanks Casie, Raymi, Lauren, Gregory, Sarah, Nolan for your open hearts and stories.

Can’t do it? Don’t want to watch? You could always play a GenX role: “hapless bystander to the extraordinary events of our time”. With that choice, maybe you should log in join the team. You might just make a better you.

Oh, and Maryam, your personal brand? Out of touch, isolated, and proud of it.

sp
@plashkes

that girlJanuary 31, 2012 08:41 EST

I suppose I'm part of this Generation Y. I don't feel like I brand myself, nor do I have a public blog. All those insecurities and fears that you say you had, I also have. I am just now starting to feel comfortable with myself, and that takes time. There will always be people who put themselves out there...but for most of us, I think it takes a long time to be who you really are and feel free to express who you are to the world, however you choose to. Props to those people who are expressing their true selves, even if they go about it in an odd manner. To those who "brand" themselves in an attempt to be popular, i wish they would realize it is a short road...however, I can't say that I'm any better, sitting in my corner of the world, not venturing outside, spending all my time on reddit and facebook, not having exciting adventures. Personally, it sounds really nice to have exciting things to do, and blog about.

Anyway, I'm getting there slowly. I wish everyone could have a self-affirming journey. Sounds silly, but there's a really good TED talk about this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=X4Qm9cGRub0 It's about living your life from a place of worthiness (she calls it Wholeheartedness). I feel lucky to be finding my worth, even if I do think it is a little late at age 25 to be beginning.

LauraJanuary 31, 2012 13:25 EST

Such a long article just so the author can hear herself complain about something she could never achieve herself.

RobJanuary 31, 2012 17:17 EST

What a sad little article.

It's true what one commenter said - this reeks of a ploy to gain some reads and is no doubt fueled by the gnawing sensation in the writer's belly that they have missed the digital boat entirely.

Taking shots across the bow of people you have never spoken to (I note that there isn't a single interview or quote aside from what you pulled from their sites) isn't just sad - it's poor journalism.

The article is a weird mix - at times indignant and disdainful of the self-promoting culture, and at others attempts to take credit for it. "Oh this self-obsessed culture sucks and it's our fault, but that makes it ok to denigrate these kids."

Is there perhaps a sense of jealousy? That these young people have accomplished something that you're still trying to work out yourself?

And hey if we want to be petty and take shots at people without actually speaking to them, let's do a quick google search for 'Maryam Sanati', shall we?

- A twitter account that was registered but never used (possible that it isn't you, have to keep these things in mind).

- The only actual articles with your name attached are about sex (the only thing that sells more papers than self-promotion is sex promotion, after all) and how 'your' generation gets more plastic surgery than anyone else: "...they just want to kind of recapture their youth and the physique that they had," Sanati said. "More than that, it's really the boomer market that's driving plastic surgery."

- You were laid off as Chatelaine's editor in chief after less than a year as Editor in Chief - ouch! That's got to hurt.

I could dig deeper but why bother, it's only an article in The Walrus.

Oh come onJanuary 31, 2012 17:31 EST

@ Rob:

How do you write words without knowing how to read them? I.e., "Taking shots across the bow of people you have never spoken to (I note that there isn't a single interview or quote aside from what you pulled from their sites) isn't just sad — it's poor journalism."

Maryam Sanati & Casie Stewart: "When we meet, just after the Halloween weekend, she tells me she spent the day working at her friend’s vintage fashion store in downtown Toronto, in exchange for free clothes."

Maryam Sanati & Nolan Bryant: "When we meet for coffee, I find it remarkable that he is only nineteen; he is so self-confident and measured."

Maryam Sanati & Sarah Nicole Prickett: "'I'm a Millennial, right?' she asks me. 'I keep reading about how unhappy we supposedly are.' One such piece happens to appear on the cover of New York magazine the week she and I meet in a downtown Toronto restaurant called the Bohemian Gastropub."

I could dig deeper but why bother.

YYZJanuary 31, 2012 18:42 EST

Removed for violation of walrusmagazine.com’s comment policy: abusive language.

KateJanuary 31, 2012 21:05 EST

I don't think this is simply a Gen Y problem. I noticed a few of these examples stem from those who are interested and involved in the fashion industry. Have people in the fashion industry not always created an image for themselves? Social media and the web is just an extension of that physical image that was once created solely through clothing.

Sea MelonJanuary 31, 2012 23:36 EST

This list of indignant comments underscores Sanati's point. I guess the first casualty of affluence is humility.

DANFebruary 01, 2012 15:27 EST

Awesome cartoon of Casie! Well done Michael.

CLFebruary 01, 2012 15:27 EST

It's quite a surprise to find Madison-avenue style marketing hoo-ha in the pages of Walrus magazine. Generation X, Y, Z, or what not. Nothing more than overly-simplistic demographics from 20th century marketing models. Shame!

stephen straussFebruary 07, 2012 17:31 EST



Viewing the world from the point of view of a generation older than Maryam, I am struck with how deaf she is to something fundamental about what she is writing about. The reason why moderns opine/vent/bloat/egotrip so incessantly in 2012 is that they can. The internet has permitted a person to both say what he/she feels, and via blogs/twitter/YouTube create an audience for their depiction of self.
A decade or so ago, a lonely, unpublished person (a category that basically included everyone on the planet) might have reflected: I have opinions that matter; I have feelings that should be heard; my life has enough authenticity to be a public life. And after arriving at that apercu...nothing. The reason why is that the existing media’s unannounced purpose was to keep most people from telling most other people about what they thought about most things. Only the tiniest sliver of a sliver of a sliver of inner voices – think Leah McLaren and Rebecca Eckler and Russell Smith in this country– got to be heard. And part of the reason their columns (particularly Leah’s) elicited so much bile and hatred was that when a newspaper or magazine published them they at the same time didn’t publish someone or someone’s else. Old media’s space and time constraints didn’t allow for more than a very few voices to be heard – no matter what they had to say nor how well they said it.
Today we find ourselves in a timeless, spaceless, webby, bloggy world where the lonely mute people of the past can brand themselves. Can publish themselves. Can establish an audience for themselves. And so they do. In 2012 we are experiencing not so much freedom of the press as freedom from the press.
And so the essential question moderns face is really not what is one generation doing that another might have wanted to do but didn’t, but a reconfiguration of McLuhan’s “the medium is the message” trope. When a new media arises we don’t know at its birth what its true message is. And so we experiment with stuff to find out what really works. Today we don’t know if too many bad blogs will require so much time to sort through that their simple existence will diminish the value of the good blogs. Call it Gresham’s Law Applied to Self-Publishing. Or if a personal brand we establish for ourselves at 18 will become a hateful stereotype we can’t escape at 40. Or what will happen to our psychological well-being if we can’t personally live up to the public persona we have created
These questions among other things, among a whole universe of other things, remain to be answered and so we blog/twitter/YouTube and await for history to tell us what the web is really good for. If you want a classic example of sorting things out when a new media arises, take a look at the history of airplanes and in particular the rise and fall of that now bizarre application of flight known as barnstorming. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnstorming.
We are, it seems to me, today trying to sort out if a personal blog/brand is the 21st century’s version barnstorming, or if it is the inner voice's equivalent of the arrival of the airline industry.

really?February 08, 2012 09:40 EST

What annoys me most about this piece is the repeated use of "we" when the writer should really be saying "I". It reminds me of travelling abroad with a naive 18-year-old who kept embarrassing me by saying things like "oh, we don't do that in Canada". There are plenty of people in my cohort (I'm 33) and Maryam's who would have taken to the new technologies and behaviours with wild abandon – and the Boomers just as much so, I'm sure. We just didn't have the tools. Does that really make it a generation gap?

Ell TeeFebruary 22, 2012 14:19 EST

Put any of these people on a Greyhound, headed for Hollywood or New York with dreams of stardom and there's no difference. Previous to the Online Age, precious, young things going nova from the internal pressure of their own importance would be left to develop a sense of perspective.

Add a comment

  
I agree to walrusmagazine.com’s comments policy.

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookRSS
On newsstands now
New Issue on Sale
June 2012
Subscribe online for as little as $2.49 an issue. Visit The Walrus Store
to buy prints of our covers
The Walrus Foundation National Event Guide

The Walrus HOOPP Pension Debate
Be It Resolved That Canadians Are Incapable
of Saving for Their Retirement Needs Alone

12 pm, Wednesday, May 30 at
Hart House Debate Room, Toronto

The Walrus Glenbow Debate
Calgary’s Cowboy Culture:
Living Legacy or Just History?

6:30 pm, Thursday, June 7 at
Epcor Centre: Max Bell Theatre, Calgary

The Walrus Laughs
The Walrus SoapBox