<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richard Ford in Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/02/27/richard-ford-in-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/02/27/richard-ford-in-canada/</link>
	<description>Canada and its place in the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Bodwell</title>
		<link>http://walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/02/27/richard-ford-in-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-14854</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Bodwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 16:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2008/02/27/richard-ford-in-canada/#comment-14854</guid>
		<description>The most troubling thing about this article is that it sights Nielsen BookScan numbers as though they are accurate and then makes bold assumptions by using those numbers as factual. 

BookScan is a private, un-audited company. Their claim of recording &quot;roughly 70% of retail book sales&quot; is just that...a claim. 

BookScan is hurting the book world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most troubling thing about this article is that it sights Nielsen BookScan numbers as though they are accurate and then makes bold assumptions by using those numbers as factual. </p>
<p>BookScan is a private, un-audited company. Their claim of recording &#8220;roughly 70% of retail book sales&#8221; is just that&#8230;a claim. </p>
<p>BookScan is hurting the book world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

