The Walrus Blog

Coming Down From David Wants to Fly

A Hot Doc in hindsight

I had expected the premiere of David Sieveking’s David Wants to Fly to be a modest proceeding. The premise of the documentary — recent film school grad devotes himself to Transcendental Meditation because David Lynch tells him to — is ridiculous.David Wants to Fly

© Adrian Stähli

I had expected the premiere of David Sieveking’s David Wants to Fly to be a modest proceeding. The premise of the documentary — recent film school grad devotes himself to Transcendental Meditation because David Lynch tells him to — is ridiculous. There couldn’t be that many people who would skip Still Alive in Gaza for it.

I arrived late, then spent ten minutes looking for a seat. The place was packed. Eventually I squeezed myself between a slight grey-haired man and a boisterous couple who traded Lynch anecdotes as a Hot Docs programmer took the stage. “So, how many of you are here for your interest in Transcendental Meditation?” he asked. The small man next to me and a few others raised their hands. “And how many of you are here for your interest in David Lynch?” Hands shot up like reeds around the theatre. There was even some whooping. Of course! This was a Lynch fan event.

David Wants to Fly
is about whackos (David Lynch), lost film school grads (David Sieveking), and exploitation (Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and his “TM movement”). It’s told through Sieveking’s personal narrative: He wants to make great movies, like his idol, David Lynch. At home in Berlin, he hears of a TM conference at Fairfield, Iowa’s Maharishi Peace Palace where Lynch will be speaking about, or rather advocating for, the practice.

David Lynch is way into TM. Maybe David Sieveking should be way into TM, too. After too many scenes of Sieveking being quirky (he can’t work the iron; he and his girlfriend wear silly hats), he heads to the conference to find out. Soon our hero is interviewing Lynch, who expounds in his shockingly nasal voice on the value of Transcendental Meditation while making spirit fingers. TM is to be credited with his success as a filmmaker and a human being, he tells us. It’s blown his mind. Everyone should do it, he says, “because people are suffocating inside these rubber clouds of negativity.” The rubber is stinky. And why do people want to be clouds, anyway?

Sieveking is convinced. Back in Berlin, off he goes to the local TM centre, where he brings the required offerings (roses, fruit, a white handkerchief, and €2,380) and receives the special mantra that he is to repeat soundlessly to himself twice a day for twenty minutes. Things do get better for him — he feels relaxed, he gets funding for his movie — until they get worse. His film, on the other hand, tromps along assuredly. TM is a gold mine of a subject. The Maharishi, who died in early 2008, was abusive, amateurish, kind, hypocritical, holy, powerful, and revered as a god. His movement’s leaders dress like King Friday XIII on Mr. Rogers; its administration collects truckloads of money from followers while promising such treasures as peace on earth and invincibility for Germany.

As a filmmaker, Sieveking handles it all with a touching amount of respect. He keeps us convinced that he wants to believe in TM — at least until it’s exposed as devilishly corrupt — but can’t force himself to accept it. This lends a sweet and genuine tone to what could easily have been just cynical comedy or public flogging. In the end, Sieveking’s — and David Wants to Fly‘s — greatest concern is finding real spirituality, a goal that leads him on an epic hike through the Himalayas towards the source of the Ganges. The camera work is deft and the landscapes look phenomenal, and when the director is finally splashing around in the mythical mountain pool we understand what he was looking for: something to refresh, calm, invigorate, and inspire. The real thing was ultimately harder to attain, but at least it was free.

Tags • , , , , , , ,
Posted in Moving Pictures  • 

  • Gerhard Schöner

    I experienced the film as a unsuccessful atempt of Sieveking to ride on David Lynchs wave of fame – facts are rather scares, the whole thing is like a collection of scene-shots that realy don’t fit together, allthough he tries hard to drag’em close by the hair… .
    Save Your bugs for something more interesting, … .

  • Gerhard Schöner

    I saw the film but experienced it more as an unsuccessful attempt of Sieveking to ride on the wave of Lynch’s fame.
    Things don’t really fit and there isn’t a real story going through the conglomerate of sometimes trivial situations…
    There are films more worth while, to be modest —

  • Dowling Woods

    It’s possible that this review is an accurate portrayal of this film, but the sentence on Maharishi is so bizarre as to drift toward the hilarious, since other than than “kind” and “powerful” the adjectives used to describe Maharishi are apparently generated by a faulty version of Madlibs, and, similarly, have no connection to reality, history, or verifiable fact.

    One wonders if the film is equally bogus, but no matter, since it is a fairly simple matter to portray anything you want any way you want to (just ask Michael Moore), and yet one person’s disgruntled journey does not negate the positive experiences of millions of others who simply like what TM does for them.

    “By their fruits ye shall know them”

  • No-jive Jake

    When you say Maharishi was “abusive, amateurish, hypocritical,” etc., are you merely expressing the idiosyncratic and mixed up sentiments of the film, or are you espousing these conclusions yourself? In either case, anyone truly familiar with Maharishi and his meditation techniques would find the description most baffling. Such sweeping adjectives do not compute: Maharishi was never known to be abusive, but was famous for his kindness and concern for the people around him and for his one-pointed desire to ease people’s suffering and help them find inner peace thorough meditation. As a monk, he never profited financially from his teaching activities (though the film falsely characterized him as power seeking) and no one ever made money off of TM. Critical thinking demands that one consider the possibility that this one-sided film is a sham. The film’s accusations against TM were debunked a long time ago. Sieveking just takes the rotting old criticisms of TM that have been decomposing on the dark, lunatic fringes of the Internet for years and tries to revive them in the guise of the “honest seeker”fumbling his way toward his own feeble and self-serving ends. Sieveking never gave meditation a chance and knew right where he was going from the start: lets make TM look like it’s ripping people off (folks will think I’m smart and heroic for exposing this!), deride the famous David Lynch (people will love seeing a film about Lynch!) and make me look like a sensitive, spontaneous, slightly victimized (gain sympathy!), cool, creative filmmaker! (Then maybe I can get a new girlfriend, since the one in the film dumped me.) I don’t blame her. There is scant artistic achievement in this film, and zero moral gain.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=509499674 Anthea Karanasos

      I have just started reading about TM. Before aligning myself with something like this, I must do my own reading & research. There are many unanswered questions. My main question is this:

      Why — if the ultimate goal of TM is to bring about world peace & to minimize stress & emotional suffering — is there such a high price to learn? Or a price at all? Much stress & suffering goes on in poor & homeless populations. It seems cruel & unconscionable to exclude so many. I read that the David Lynch Foundation offers grants to help some of those who are unable to pay, but that’s not enough.

      I believe at my core that instruction to learn TM — which is purported to be so life- and world-transforming — needs to be accessible to all. This egregious lack of access is what causes me to feel skeptical, & the capitalist approach degrades credibility in my opinion.

      Where does all that money go?

  • http://www.crowdrise.com/supportmeditation/fundraiser/russellbrand Frank Booth

    i don’t know – the film seemed pretty weak and disingenuous to me – i am sure that the TM organization, like any organization, has probably made its share of mistakes (even if the TM meditation itself totally rocks)

    and so, on one hand, it seems that you’ve got a smarmy wanna-be filmmaker who starts out with a clearly biased agenda to “punk” David Lynch

    and on the other hand, you’ve got many hundreds of peer reviewed scientific studies performed over the last 40 years, from top research institutions around the world, published in highly regarded medical journals – and you also have famous people like David Lynch, Hugh Jackman, Howard Stern, Mehmet Oz, Moby, Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, Donovan, Russell Brand, Russell Simmons, Jerry Seinfeld, The Alkaline Trio, Laura Dern, Mike Love, Clint Eastwood and Stephen Collins (among many others) who enjoy TM so much that they feel to publicly advocate for it

    you also have current grants and research being done through the National Institutes of Health, the American Heart Association, the National Heart and Lung Association, Harvard Medical School, Stanford Medical School and the Veterans Administration

    but the smug flippant cheap shot seems to always be an easy one to take (and to review/promote)

  • Bill

    Everything they offer “for sale” actually works. Is that corruption? There are crooks everywhere, and the TM organization isn’t one of them.

  • http://www.suggestibility.org Joe

    “In either case, anyone truly familiar with Maharishi and his meditation techniques would find the description most baffling.” I have 15 years of familiarity and I know that the description is not baffling at all, it’s just inadequate to describe the baseness of the man. And Lynch is completely looney-tunes. I discuss Lynch in particular here: http://www.suggestibility.org/DavidLynch.shtml.

  • http://tmfree.blogspot.com/ Sudarsha

    I spent two years with Mahesh as one of his secretaries (not one of the skin boys). While I have no difficulty noting that TM (JUST TM, 2×20) may have some benefit for some people, on the whole, the organization that promotes TM is run by delusional people who have invested not only their lives, but their finances in total submission to Mahesh and Maheshism.

    I watched Mahesh day after day. He was charming, demanding, ruthless and had a disturbing ability to get in amongst his people not altogether unlike a virus and simply take over.

    While there may be, at least for some, some value in the style of meditation Mahesh promoted, full immersion into the strange and bizarre world of the TM organization is HIGHLY NOT recommended.

  • LaughingGull

    Step away from the computer Tom…I repeat, step away from the computer! Time for program…

  • http://www.nsrusa.org David Spector

    I studied with Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, taking three consecutive teacher training courses in Spain and Italy in 1971-2, followed in 1978 by the TM-Sidhi program in Switzerland. I have practiced TM daily for 40 years and was active as a TM teacher throughout the USA in the 1970s.

    Was Maharishi a perfect, holy fountain of love, who offered the rapid achievement of perfection on earth and whose organization was admirable for its financial and organizational ethics? I think not. There were flaws. There still are. I would not be surprised to learn that much money was amateurishly squandered instead of being used to spread TM to the world.

    Was Maharishi an exploiter, a seeker of political and financial power, and a promoter of a useless scam? Certainly not. The research shows the results are real. My observation showed Maharishi to be devoted to long days of devoted work, allowing himself only tasty meals as his only pay. And David Lynch today is continuing that tradition of wonderful work, personally sponsoring highly effective TM programs in high schools and prisons, places where before the advent of TM, noise and violence obscured any possibility of getting an education or obtaining reform of antisocial values.

    Both extreme points of view of Maharishi and Lynch are wrong, but the truth is hard to get at, since it is guarded and muddled by both pro and anti zealots.

    One thing I can say for sure: since its heyday in the 1960s and 70s, TM has been shooting itself in the foot. High prices, white robes and gold crowns, astrology, claims of cures for diabetes and cancer, calls for the destruction and rebuilding of homes and businesses so their entrances can point to the rising sun in the east, randomly forbidding the teaching of TM in England for many years–its policies have systematically alienated almost everyone, relegating TM now to the limbo of barely-remembered fads.

    Following this alienation of TM from view, and perhaps fueled by it, there has been a renaissance in effective teaching of deep meditation. Vipassana (Insight) meditation and my own Natural Stress Relief (NSR) meditation are only two of hundreds of organizations, big and small, offering truly low-cost programs of systematic, easy, and natural meditation. And scientific studies are confirming many of these more recent programs just as they validated and are continuing to validate the original TM.

    These new programs are not TM. Mine is so-it-yourself, self-taught from a manual, which is actually considered an ineffective approach by TM folks–yet research shows that it works just as well, especially when accompanied by proper support.

    Have David Lynch, Maharishi, or TM been debunked by this film? Will people turn away from meditation? Of course not.

    I would imagine that David Sieveking got connected to some people with a grudge, or didn’t seek support from his teacher when he started having problems. In any case, he appears to be an intelligent person with an extreme, unsubstantiated opinion based on random interviews. He is welcome to his opinion under the heading ‘freedom of thought’, but I doubt he will dissuade the many people who want more energy, creativity, intelligence, autonomy, and capacity to love in their lives from seeking out effective programs that teach transcending and other forms of meditation.

    David Spector, President
    Natural Stress Relief/USA

  • Hansappelgren

    I just want to make a simple suggestion. Read “Robes of Silk, Feet of Clay” written by Judith Bourque.

    This book is a very good complementary to the film “David Wants To Fly”. (BTW, Judith is also in the film)…and then see if it’s possible to defend MMY any longer? In fact if this is at all ethical to do? This phenomena is so complex and needs to be addressed much deeper, which is exactly what is happening now, after MMY past away… It could not have happened before.

    Hans

  • jnihil

    Nothing against TM or MMY. But why do these organizations require people to part with so much money in exchange for ‘enlightenment’?
    I’ll stick with the DIY approach.

  • Luke

    Meditation itself causes contentment. The fact that “millions” for TM
    practitioners close their eyes and try to still there mind for 40
    minutes a day and feel more at peace is not a surprise; but that is not
    because of TMs instruction. It is just from the very act of closing
    your eyes and trying to still your mind. The scene where he goes to the
    neurologist and measures his brain activity using a common German word
    is a very good one. The practices you pay for, the hierarchy, all of the
    promises of invincibility, world peace, enlightenment, yogic flying and
    where all of the donated money went to is what is questionable about
    TM. I think David Sieveking addresses these shady aspects very well. I
    have seen many critical posts on this website concretely putting down
    David’s ideas and dismissing them as false; but none about going to the
    monastery where Maharishi started and debunking what David had
    experienced.


Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookTumblr
The Walrus SoapBox
The Walrus Laughs
Walrus TV
Archived Blog Posts
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007