The Walrus Blog

Dear Stephen Harper

A letter to the Prime Minister
NanosNanos ResearchDaily Nanos Leadership Index for April 26, 2011

On behalf of all Canadians, sir, I would like to thank you. You have done it! You have really done it. You’ve managed to get us interested in federal politics.

This campaign season began several weeks ago with you standing solemnly in an empty Parliament to dismiss a supposedly unwanted election — triggered, of course, by your government being held in contempt of Parliament — as something sure to disappoint Canadians. You didn’t pull this dismissal out of thin air: after all, the last election, held just a couple of years ago, had the lowest turnout in Canadian history; young people between eighteen and twenty-four stayed home in droves, with less than 40 percent bothering to vote. Your party subsequently wrote off the electorate, especially its youngest constituents, and your rivals seemed to agree — in this month’s televised debates, there was very little mention of any issues of interest to young people. It seems like you all assumed that young Canadians won’t vote because they don’t care, so why waste your breaths?

But something has happened. There has been a ground swell of engagement by Canadians of all ages. The internet is ablaze with political talk, more people watched the debates than the NHL playoffs, and on campuses across the country — during final exams — students are holding vote mobs. Vote mobs, Mr. Harper! The very Canadians you dismissed as apathetic, it turns out, aren’t after all. They are forming mobs, sir, and a mob is the next best thing to a riot.

Stephen HarperConservative.caPrime Minister Stephen Harper

We saw something like this in 2008 — i.e., an unprecedented number of young and discouraged voters becoming engaged in politics for the first time in their lives. The problem was that it happened in American politics, and it centred on the charisma of Barack Obama. The sexiness of the American presidential election only served to highlight the dullness and hollowness of our Canadian choices, further discouraging voters.

But all that is changing, Mr. Harper. Things are really turning around. There are mobs, sir! Mobs! And this exciting shift is largely thanks to you.

I would like to tell you that your own charisma is inspiring Canadians to become involved in this election. Or that one of your competitors is taking the country by storm with a message of hope and change. But, much like last time, this election is pretty much void of any charisma, save for one plucky challenger. Left wanting for something positive and hopeful, Canadians have found an equally powerful inspiration in response to what you lack. These vote mobs, this Facebook chatter, the viral videos, and potty-mouthed websites that show the increasing engagement of those young voters you dismissed are not partisan per se, but are united, instead, by a severe distaste for the Harper Government and the questionable ways it runs things. Canadians from all walks of life, from the Arcade Fire, to Margaret Atwood, to Joe Nobody, are lashing out against your five years of secrecy, contempt, and hypocrisy. Canadians are engaged in federal politics now more than they have been in a very long time, thanks to you. And it looks like many young Canadians will now decide to vote for the first time. But unfortunately for you, Mr. Harper, it will be for anyone other than yourself.

Best,

A voter

Tags • , , ,
Posted in Open Letters  • 

  • marg

    This is better than Andrew Coyne’s column. It is short and more to the point. Less angst, more common sense. The Emperor has no clothes and people eyes are finally popping out.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Marilynne-Jackson/870770510 Marilynne Jackson

    Well done!

  • Paul

    From one interested young Canadian to another, This author and his ilk will doom Canada to communism.

    • Saul

      interested in what?

    • http://twitter.com/threepio Graham Williams

      Do you honestly believe that the spectre of communism is still able to frighten anyone? Put your tired tropes away and come back to the table when you’re ready to have a serious discussion.

    • Cheyanne23

      I have no idea what you mean. I will assume you are referring to some of the more social policies of the left-leaning parties? In this case, I will assume that you did not have a very good social studies teacher, and this teacher didn’t teach you that socialism does not have to be complete, it can exist alongside capitalism, and is an economic system. I will also assume that this teacher never bothered to mention that Communism is in fact a political system and that the only way the two relate is that communism is socialist. (As in, socialism is not communism, and socialism has existed in Canada for a looong time, right within a democracy and alonside capitalism)

    • Atmacgillivray

      Social Democracy and communism are as far apart as conservatism and fascism. You’re not a facist, right? And I’m not a communist.

  • Anonymous

    @Paul If you let Harper have his majority you doom Canada to fascism.

  • Ajpaul

    I believe that Harper and the people around him have been the only ones for a very long time to show some back bone in governing us and for us. Remember polititions, do and say anything, to get elected. Once elected, will do anything to stay there.
    Once in a while, there comes a statesman, who will do what it takes to make it right in the long run. That is, when things get tough in a world like we are in these days, we need leadership that is solid and proven. The right way and best way, is not always the easy way.
    I said about back bone. Remember the weaponds of mass distruction, there were none. I was very proud to be a Canadian the day he told the Americans there would be no going to war without proof. There is absolutly no way these other two fellows that claim to be able to lead this country, are even close to being in the same calibre.
    We as the voting public, must make a choice to keep our economy and our country strong. Make your vote reflect what you may think, next year.

    • ABC

      Are we thinking about the same Harper here? Or do you have a different interpretation of what is the right way, Machiavelli? I don’t think twice proroguing parliament (once to shut down the Afghanistan inquiry and another to prevent a coalition due to the mishandling of the economic meltdown – the conservative claim that there was no economic crisis and stimulus spending was unnecessary) is the right way to govern. I don’t think misleading parliament that $50 million in spending was for border security and then redirecting it to Muskoka to pork barrel in Tony Clement’s riding is the right way to govern. I don’t think tolerating unethical behaviour from ministers without removing them from their positions is the right way to govern, I’m looking at you Bev Oda, Jason Kenney. I don’t think the politics of division (calling refugees ‘queue jumpers’ is disgustingly inhumane!) are the right way to govern and the negative advertising – that is no high road. Unlike you, I believe that Harper does not know the right way to govern – his approach is authoritarian and his refusal to work with the other parties is disrespectful to the citizens of this country. I support democracy and the candidates who respect it. (Oh by the way, Harper supported the Iraq invasion and argued against the Chretien government and their refusal to join the Americans – could you have confused the two?) Keeping the economy strong? Bogus. He argued against the current “restrictive” legislation that he now touts as being responsible for shielding us against the worst of the economic melt-down. And his decision to cut the GST – that was responsible for eliminating budget surpluses and left us exposed when the economic crisis hit resulting in larger deficit budgets and an increased national debt. He’s certainly no economic genius. I’m just glad he’s not a doctor if this is how his expertise manifests itself. ABC.

    • Groda

      Well said.

  • Illgottengoods

    All this fear mongering anti Harper talk with no real substance as to why. i’ll be voting CPC, rather than the party that’s been caught stealing from us, or the party that has a record of bankrupting us.

  • Joe Canuck

    The rise of fascism and censorship in Canada.

    VAG speaks out against the arrest of Chinese dissident artist but snubs one of our own who dares criticize the Harper Government.

    Dear Editor,

    Below in red font is a letter I originally emailed to the Vancouver Art Gallery (VAG) requesting permission to stage an art happening. Since it has told me to take a hike, literally, to City Hall, I am disseminating the email as an Open Letter. VAG’s position is that since it does not own the property on which I intend to do my art performance/happening, it therefore cannot grant me any permission. I was told to seek permission from the City of Vancouver (City Hall).

    I find VAG’s stance odd and rather cold, if not highly hypocritical because only a few weeks earlier Daina Augaitis, VAG’s chief curator, went on the record and publicly denounced the detention of Chinese dissident artist Ai Weiwei. Just who is Ai Weiwei and what does he have to do with Canada? No one really knows or cares except VAG, apparently.

    More to the point, does VAG need the permission of City Hall each and every time it puts up a show within and immediately outside its premises? Who are the people running VAG, and do they have a hidden ‘neo-con’ agenda that is inconsistent if not contrary to its mandate? What exactly is VAG’s mandate, anyway? Maybe we really have to go to City Hall to get the answers, since no one at VAG will tell us

    If you oppose censorship and support free-speech and artistic freedom, I respectfully solicit your emails of support and will forward them to my MLA and other relevant parties.

    Yours truly,
    Joe Canuck
    http://www.joecanuck.net

    Here is the original email to VAG

    ATTENTION: Kathleen Bartels, director of VAG

    April 12, 2011

    This is a formal request for permission to stage an art happening or art performance at the public area just outside the VAG entrance facing Robson Street – commonly referred to as the ‘lawn’ or ‘steps.’ All costs will be borne by me. I indemnify VAG of any legal liabilities, if any.

    The performance will consist of a fictional fascist group of artists called Photo Conceptualists Against Socialist Coalition or PCASC. They will publicly denounce the ‘socialist’ coalition of Michael Ignatieff and direct their vitriolic diatribe at Jack Layton’s NDP party as “socialistic.” They will also denounce populist or ‘socialist’ art, namely me, Joe Canuck, and burn reproductions of my paintings.

    My message is this: If Canada becomes a fascist police state, scenes of art and book burnings will be all too common on our streets. “Degenerate” was a term favored by the Nazis in describing socialist literature and populist art that was critical of the Third Reich and therefore summarily and spectacularly torched. “Socialist” seems to be the operative word of choice for Harper’s Conservatives. If that is the case, then I am the self-proclaimed “People’s Artist” or Leftist or socialist artist and I want to highlight what is at stake in this federal election.

    Do I exaggerate when I say that this is our Spanish Civil War: the Fascists against the Left. Never in my adult life have I seen Canadian politics so divisive and so extreme as it is now. Is it libelous to call Harper a “neo-fascist” or is that simply calling a “spade a spade,” when he has revealed his utter and shameless contempt for parliament and democracy? Last summer’s 2-billion-dollar-bash-fest of a weekend in Toronto (a conceit of fiscal conservatism, if not a travesty of Habeas corpus), reminded me of the military crackdown against Buddhist monks in Myanmar a few years ago. Is this the Canada that we want: a third world military junta state?

    The purpose of my performance art/happening is to shock Canadians out of their apathy so that they will vote in the federal election. By not voting, by not exercising our democratic right and privilege we do a great disservice to those men and women who died fighting for this country and to those who are still being killed and maimed in Afghanistan. By not voting, we dishonor them and their sacrifice was in vain. Let not their sacrifice be in vain. Let us honor them and cherish our democratic way of life by exercising our rights and privileges before we no longer have those rights and privileges to exercise and cherish.

    Joe Canuck
    http://www.joecanuck.net

  • Ossydavid

    “…secrecy, contempt, and hypocrisy…” Yeah that pretty well sums things up! And all from the guy who pledged to change everything that was wrong in Ottawa. The Liberals took 40 years to get not nearly as bad as these crooks have in five! Well done ‘Dear Leader’ harpo!

  • Pingback: Morning Coffee with David Farrell, April 29

  • http://www.statcentric.com GuestWeb Analytics Software

    we all know what politicians do before they get elected in terms of great promises and after being elected to to stay there.. the way this column has depicted the right picture of the current scenarios is worth admirable…

  • Wts

    The problem with the young voters is they don’t really care about nor understand the issues….who forced the election…oh..it must have been Harper cause we young don’t like him….why not….well cause he’s not as charismatic as Jack Layton….well Jack’s been lying to the public for a very long time and he’s very good at it….Mr Ignatieff and Mr Harper aren’t quite as good at lying but mostly because they don’t have to. The have provided platforms that are workable and all they have to do is explain them. Layton can’t do that because then he would have to try to explain what they will cost and where he’ll get the money.Jack has provided one that will only cost 70B…yes young people that’s a B there and if you’re not sure what it means look it up. And it will be your children and their children that will try to pay that one off. Of course that 70 billion includes a lot of massages. Anybody that doesn’t understand how well Canada weathered this latest recession only has to look south of the border to see how bad it really is for the rest of the world..only some of the south American countries appear to be unscathed but Canada has done extremely well and of course we had to spend money to do that. The situation that exists today IE. a large deficit would have occurred regardless of which party was in power. And do me a favour..the next time you notice Jack limping somebody remind him that when you give up the cane the limp is still supposed to be there…And one last note, the last time we tried politicians that were charismatic it ended up costing us over 600 billion (there’s that word again) Canadian dollars and that sum has cost us billions over the years just in interest…vote….but know your facts before you do and please, pretty please don’t vote for someone just because they have a nice smile or you happen to like them..Find out what the issues and facts are then make a wise vote…

  • Dziban

    The damage is done, the sentence has been declared… Canadians ever since may 2nd wait for their ride accross the Stix river. There are many hints as to what is in stock for us in the next 3 years, none of it is good news. For quebeckers, their “national” party in crumbles, might just bounce back with all this malcontent. The one moment where quebec chooses to make a stand to uphold something right and be part of Canadian Politics, and this is how everything turns out. Bills and charters have been passing for the last 2 months, why does Canada need prisons?Why do we need new Helicopters and state of the art Fighter planes? Who in their right mind would invade a frozen wasteland???
    I commend you for your efforts 7 months ago, this article is beautifully written, yet what is it of the aftermath? Is it just in Québec that people are disgusted with doings in Ottawa? I know these comments are to give an anwer, yet there are no answers I can give that are comforting, and as days go by, Parliament Hill gets under even deeper fog.

    the voice of 61,4% of canadians were heard on may the 2nd…in simple math out of the 100% of those 61,4% —- 39,6% voted Tories… that leaves 60,4% of the voters. Divided, unatended and waiting for a miracle to happen. There’s something about those numbers that leaves you wondering, if 60,4% of the voters DID NOT vote for him… how does he stand in majority?… and now he tries to draw new voting sectors for Torie fortresses? Hopefullly, in 2015, people will realize that conservative means stopping, retrograde, I pray to faith that it wont be too late.


Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
TwitterFacebookTumblr
The Walrus SoapBox
The Walrus Laughs
Walrus TV
Archived Blog Posts
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007