The Walrus Blog

These American Lies

The agony and ecstasy of fact checking
RetractedThis American Life episode No. 460: “Retraction

For my money, the four most important people on The Walrus editorial team are Victoria Beale, Gregory Furgala, Kristin Gorsline, and Sara McCulloch. These fact-checking interns, hired for a six-month stint, earn very little glory and no pay, but are vital to the work of the magazine. Every item we publish must withstand their scrutiny; they re-interview subjects, scour primary and secondary sources, and verify facts with experts. They consult frequently with editors and writers, debating and discussing the most accurate word choices and descriptions. If information can’t be verified to our standards, sections of stories are cut or reworked. It takes days, even weeks, for an intern to thoroughly fact check a story — only to be followed by another intern, who then double checks everything.

A few recent fact-checking endeavours at The Walrus: during some of the worst violence in Yemen, one intern tracked down a woman in that country, the sister of an memoirist, to corroborate details of family history; meanwhile, another intern spoke to about a dozen geneticists, researchers, and doctors to check a story about the Human Genome Project; yet another intern confirmed the length of one day’s parliamentary session down to the minute. Even fiction is fact checked in The Walrus: if, say, a protagonist has a coming-of-age moment during the 1998 Stanley Cup playoffs, an intern will verify the teams that played that year — for the record, Detroit Red Wings versus Washington Capitals. (That is, unless the author’s intention is to monkey around with reality. But in such cases, the story will be checked for internal consistency and logic.)

Mistakes still occur — none of us is infallible — but by the time the magazine is shipped to the printer, every effort has been made to ensure articles are accurate and truthful. This isn’t bragging or smug back-patting — this is very least that readers should expect from us.

I’m feeling especially grateful for our fact checkers at the moment, after spending the weekend absorbed in the news about the popular US public radio program This American Life and its retraction of the most-downloaded episode in its seventeen-year history. “Mr. Daisey and the Apple Factory,” broadcast in January, explores Apple’s manufacturing processes in China. The story was based on a one-man show by actor-writer Mike Daisey, The Agony and the Ecstasy of Steve Jobs, an agit-prop exposé of the company’s labour practices abroad.

Late last week, in an excruciating and candid episode, Ira Glass, the show’s usually unflappable host and executive producer, revealed that a reporter named Rob Schmitz had tracked down Daisey’s Chinese interpreter, Cathy Lee, and learned that Daisey had fabricated parts of his story. (Daisey had told a fact checker at TAL that he couldn’t locate Lee and the checker didn’t push further; Schmitz, after listening to the podcast and noticing several details that sounded off, found Lee following one quick Google search and a single phone call.) The retraction episode, which aired yesterday, is raw and fascinating and well worth a listen. (You can find it here.) The pauses in the tense conversation between Glass and Daisey speak volumes.

While Daisey admits he was dishonest, he maintains it was for the greater good: people wouldn’t care about the plight of Chinese workers unless he dressed up — or rather, made up — the details. Lying is his greatest offense, but his justification reveals a breathtaking contempt for the excellent, credible, reporting on Apple’s labour practices by journalists in China and elsewhere, as well as a disregard for the advocacy work on the issue by human rights activists. Just as vexing is Daisey’s disrespect for Lee: did he really think China was such a backwater, and she such a rube that his lies wouldn’t get back to her eventually? Finally, there’s Daisey’s underestimation of his audience. He offers the laziest and cheapest of evasions: the public doesn’t want truth, it wants theatre.

This might be what offends me the most: Daisey’s suggestion that non-fiction writing can’t enlighten and move an audience without resorting to lies. Like Jayson Blair and Stephen Glass before him, Daisey pulled off a classic cheat. He utilized the idea of truth for emotional impact (much of the story’s potency came from the belief that it all really happened), but he didn’t trust that truth — and his own narratives skills — to carry the story. Ultimately, he failed as both a journalist and as an artist (only the latter of which he now claims to be).

For its part, TAL has been admirably transparent and forthcoming in acknowledging its responsibility for the deception. The show is not a news program in the strictest sense, but Daisey’s item was presented as journalism and should have been verified to those standards. TAL’s producers trusted Daisey and “went on author” (what we call it when a fact can’t be confirmed, but we trust the writer based on their credibility) in certain cases because so much of what he said did check out with other news reports and Apple’s own audit of its Chinese factories.

Journalist Craig Silverman, an indefatigable watchdog of media error, details TAL’s fact-checking missteps here. Still, after listening to Glass’s painstaking autopsy of the error, it’s difficult to feel anything other than professional and personal empathy. In the end, all I can think is there but for the grace of Gregory, Kristin, Sara, and Victoria go I.

Rachel Giese is a senior editor at The Walrus.

Tags • , , , , , , ,
Posted in Media  • 

  • Hieu Ho
  • Anonymous
  • Anonymous
  • Helenalex

    “For my money, the four most important people on The Walrus editorial team are Victoria Beale, Gregory Furgala, Kristin Gorsline, and Sara McCulloch.”

    But apparently the least valuable people, since you don’t think their work is worth paying them for.

    • C-Gro

      She did specify “[f]or my money”, though, so I’d have to agree with her there.

  • Sunny

    Exactly! So very important and so very unworthy of a salary. A little (ok, a lot) obtuse here. Especially since your interns were paid once upon a time.

  • ScrapPaper

    Internships are the new slave labour. Why not give them a paid apprenticeship?

    And while you’re at it, Walrus, how about some gender equality is your internship hiring? Young men are just as capable as young women, and deserve equal opportunities.

    • C-Gro

      Gregory Furgala is a dude’s name.

  • Pingback: story board News for the Canadian media freelancer March 19–25, 2012

  • HornGirl

    Wow.. seriously? the only thing anyone has to comment about is actually something that has nothing to do with what the article is about? really? Holy jeeze, what is wrong with people, always looking for something to critisize and fight against. Isn’t it exhausting being so cynical all of the time?

    • ScrapPaper

      And your post has what, specifically, to do with the subject of the article, HornGirl?

      Perhaps you should read a little more carefully the three posts above yours, which you are quick to slam. All three are about fact-checking at the Walrus, and the magazine’s exploitation of them as unpaid labour. How is that NOT relevant?

Canada & its place in the world. Published by
the non-profit charitable Walrus Foundation
The Walrus SoapBox
The Walrus Laughs
Walrus TV
Archived Blog Posts
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007